<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pixelsilk: SEO-Friendly Content Management&#160;System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pixelsilk-seo-cms/14743/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pixelsilk-seo-cms/14743/</link>
	<description>Latest Search Engine News from the Search Engine Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:10:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Knowles</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pixelsilk-seo-cms/14743/comment-page-1/#comment-1174410</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Knowles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 06:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=14743#comment-1174410</guid>
		<description>Michel,

You guys have some cool stuff going on over there, hats off. I wouldn&#039;t rush to characterize the Pixelsilk feature set as &quot;less advanced&quot; than &quot;xyz&quot;... There are numerous features and deployment techniques not mentioned in the nice article by Ann. The Pixelsilk rendering engine alone is an impressive piece of work that we have not seen anywhere. 
( but, then again I am biased ;-)

Kind regards,     

Mark Knowles
President &amp; CEO 
Pixelsilk, Inc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michel,</p>
<p>You guys have some cool stuff going on over there, hats off. I wouldn&#8217;t rush to characterize the Pixelsilk feature set as &#8220;less advanced&#8221; than &#8220;xyz&#8221;&#8230; There are numerous features and deployment techniques not mentioned in the nice article by Ann. The Pixelsilk rendering engine alone is an impressive piece of work that we have not seen anywhere.<br />
( but, then again I am biased ;-)</p>
<p>Kind regards,     </p>
<p>Mark Knowles<br />
President &amp; CEO<br />
Pixelsilk, Inc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Knowles</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pixelsilk-seo-cms/14743/comment-page-1/#comment-1165067</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Knowles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=14743#comment-1165067</guid>
		<description>Ashlex &amp; Pixelrage: 

Thanks for your feedback. We will get the pricing front and center on the site. Pixelsilk has turn key packages starting at $149.00 per month. 

The API rocks and that has spurred some very cool things to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ashlex &amp; Pixelrage: </p>
<p>Thanks for your feedback. We will get the pricing front and center on the site. Pixelsilk has turn key packages starting at $149.00 per month. </p>
<p>The API rocks and that has spurred some very cool things to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michel Leconte</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pixelsilk-seo-cms/14743/comment-page-1/#comment-1159857</link>
		<dc:creator>Michel Leconte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=14743#comment-1159857</guid>
		<description>An alternative to Pixelsilk is seotoaster, except the feature set is more advanced, including automated 301, deep-linking, and link sculpting using Java Script and even point and click siloing.  

It is also free and open source, extremely easy to use, easy to build websites using standard HTMl, CSS, easy to SEO with key-phrase suggestion, a number of built-in default behavior for image and media tagging, on-site SEO factors alignment, and it connects to SEO Samba so that one can scale and remote control any number of websites and market them through an unified interface.

Online demo at http://www.seotoaster.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An alternative to Pixelsilk is seotoaster, except the feature set is more advanced, including automated 301, deep-linking, and link sculpting using Java Script and even point and click siloing.  </p>
<p>It is also free and open source, extremely easy to use, easy to build websites using standard HTMl, CSS, easy to SEO with key-phrase suggestion, a number of built-in default behavior for image and media tagging, on-site SEO factors alignment, and it connects to SEO Samba so that one can scale and remote control any number of websites and market them through an unified interface.</p>
<p>Online demo at <a href="http://www.seotoaster.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.seotoaster.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashlex</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pixelsilk-seo-cms/14743/comment-page-1/#comment-1154189</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashlex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=14743#comment-1154189</guid>
		<description>My initial thoughts after reading the review were: Wow, it&#039;s brilliant.I then proceeded to PixelSilk&#039;s website there was/is no mention of price, and one needs to call them to arrange a Demo. These two factors usually indicate a very high price.  I am hoping that I this CMS is sensibly price. 

PS: I tried many CMS sytems that need a programming expert to configure/integrate and I was hoping to try Pixelsilk if they had a time/feature limited downloadable demo on their website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My initial thoughts after reading the review were: Wow, it&#8217;s brilliant.I then proceeded to PixelSilk&#8217;s website there was/is no mention of price, and one needs to call them to arrange a Demo. These two factors usually indicate a very high price.  I am hoping that I this CMS is sensibly price. </p>
<p>PS: I tried many CMS sytems that need a programming expert to configure/integrate and I was hoping to try Pixelsilk if they had a time/feature limited downloadable demo on their website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pixelrage</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pixelsilk-seo-cms/14743/comment-page-1/#comment-1148452</link>
		<dc:creator>Pixelrage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=14743#comment-1148452</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m wondering what the cost is - I&#039;m usually scared when I don&#039;t see a price right on the page!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wondering what the cost is &#8211; I&#8217;m usually scared when I don&#8217;t see a price right on the page!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikolay Kostov</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pixelsilk-seo-cms/14743/comment-page-1/#comment-1147649</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikolay Kostov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=14743#comment-1147649</guid>
		<description>Good work Ann. The article was very helpfull and came just in time for me as I was just looking for a SEO friendly CMS. I&#039;ll give it a try and I&#039;ll comeback later to share my experience with the software. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work Ann. The article was very helpfull and came just in time for me as I was just looking for a SEO friendly CMS. I&#8217;ll give it a try and I&#8217;ll comeback later to share my experience with the software. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Whittal</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pixelsilk-seo-cms/14743/comment-page-1/#comment-1147316</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Whittal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=14743#comment-1147316</guid>
		<description>Wow, Pixelsilk seems to be a life saver. We are looking for a good CMS for our new project and have already gone through and tested over 10 different CMS so far. Now to try out Pixelsilk. From the detailed information you have shared, Pixelsilk seems to be a great content management system.
I&#039;m most concerned about the look and feel of a CMS and SEO factors. Look and feel mainly revolves around good Web 2.0 templates and themes. Let&#039;s see what they have in store. Thankyou for sharing useful information.
Regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Pixelsilk seems to be a life saver. We are looking for a good CMS for our new project and have already gone through and tested over 10 different CMS so far. Now to try out Pixelsilk. From the detailed information you have shared, Pixelsilk seems to be a great content management system.<br />
I&#8217;m most concerned about the look and feel of a CMS and SEO factors. Look and feel mainly revolves around good Web 2.0 templates and themes. Let&#8217;s see what they have in store. Thankyou for sharing useful information.<br />
Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
