<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PicSearch : Intuitive Relevant Image Search&#160;Engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/picsearch-intuitive-relevant-image-search-engine/6078/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/picsearch-intuitive-relevant-image-search-engine/6078/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:21:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun Radhakrishnan</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/picsearch-intuitive-relevant-image-search-engine/6078/comment-page-1/#comment-1076755</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun Radhakrishnan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 20:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/picsearch-intuitive-relevant-image-search-engine/6078/#comment-1076755</guid>
		<description>I really with I could respond to that liquidtroll !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really with I could respond to that liquidtroll !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liquidtroll</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/picsearch-intuitive-relevant-image-search-engine/6078/comment-page-1/#comment-1076741</link>
		<dc:creator>liquidtroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/picsearch-intuitive-relevant-image-search-engine/6078/#comment-1076741</guid>
		<description>Είναι νέο, ωραίο και ήρθε για να σας κρατάει συντροφία κάθε ώρα.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Είναι νέο, ωραίο και ήρθε για να σας κρατάει συντροφία κάθε ώρα.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun Radhakrishnan</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/picsearch-intuitive-relevant-image-search-engine/6078/comment-page-1/#comment-776591</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun Radhakrishnan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/picsearch-intuitive-relevant-image-search-engine/6078/#comment-776591</guid>
		<description>Good question Craig. I feel there is a lot of work that can be done at the Image front. A lot on the functional side and still more on the UI side. I had written a piece on a image site called imagery. It adds some UI tweaks to Google Image search, but that shows that a lot of things can still be done.

http://elzr.com/imagery/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question Craig. I feel there is a lot of work that can be done at the Image front. A lot on the functional side and still more on the UI side. I had written a piece on a image site called imagery. It adds some UI tweaks to Google Image search, but that shows that a lot of things can still be done.</p>
<p><a href="http://elzr.com/imagery/" rel="nofollow">http://elzr.com/imagery/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Homes</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/picsearch-intuitive-relevant-image-search-engine/6078/comment-page-1/#comment-776587</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Homes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/picsearch-intuitive-relevant-image-search-engine/6078/#comment-776587</guid>
		<description>I wonder how long it might take for Google to race in and try to buy the technology? Do they have an traction in the market as yet and why would people move away from G or MSN for image search?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how long it might take for Google to race in and try to buy the technology? Do they have an traction in the market as yet and why would people move away from G or MSN for image search?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/picsearch-intuitive-relevant-image-search-engine/6078/comment-page-1/#comment-774125</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 04:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/picsearch-intuitive-relevant-image-search-engine/6078/#comment-774125</guid>
		<description>Search seems ok. Having more than 1.7 billion images could be quite good though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search seems ok. Having more than 1.7 billion images could be quite good though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

