<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pagination and Duplicate Content&#160;Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pagination-and-duplicate-content-issues/7204/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pagination-and-duplicate-content-issues/7204/</link>
	<description>Latest Search Engine News from the Search Engine Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:53:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shubham</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pagination-and-duplicate-content-issues/7204/comment-page-1/#comment-1196640</link>
		<dc:creator>Shubham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pagination-and-duplicate-content-issues/7204/#comment-1196640</guid>
		<description>Hey Ann,

Those methods may not be perfect but they are efficient..
Duplicate content and meta tags are a huge problems to website owners..
One has to figure out an efficient way of solving this..
And about the post, its a really informative and impressive article..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ann,</p>
<p>Those methods may not be perfect but they are efficient..<br />
Duplicate content and meta tags are a huge problems to website owners..<br />
One has to figure out an efficient way of solving this..<br />
And about the post, its a really informative and impressive article..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pagination-and-duplicate-content-issues/7204/comment-page-1/#comment-1096614</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pagination-and-duplicate-content-issues/7204/#comment-1096614</guid>
		<description>simple fix use  tags to define the start and finish of a pagination.

below is a blog post from google that explains this

http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>simple fix use  tags to define the start and finish of a pagination.</p>
<p>below is a blog post from google that explains this</p>
<p><a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" rel="nofollow">http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pagination-and-duplicate-content-issues/7204/comment-page-1/#comment-1082015</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 07:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pagination-and-duplicate-content-issues/7204/#comment-1082015</guid>
		<description>Hi All,

 I use method #1 too, and think pagination is a good thing.

 One doesn&#039;t have to use the tiny 1,2,3 system (which is a pain indeed), rather use text anchor which will suit both usability and SEO (ie: &quot;Next blue widgets&quot;).

 I find myself discouraged when confronted to 10&#039;s or 100&#039;s of results. Moreover, I think there are lots of ways (user vote for instance) to sort your items so the more relevant are grouped on the first page.

 Regards,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All,</p>
<p> I use method #1 too, and think pagination is a good thing.</p>
<p> One doesn&#8217;t have to use the tiny 1,2,3 system (which is a pain indeed), rather use text anchor which will suit both usability and SEO (ie: &#8220;Next blue widgets&#8221;).</p>
<p> I find myself discouraged when confronted to 10&#8217;s or 100&#8217;s of results. Moreover, I think there are lots of ways (user vote for instance) to sort your items so the more relevant are grouped on the first page.</p>
<p> Regards,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin @ Palmer Web Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pagination-and-duplicate-content-issues/7204/comment-page-1/#comment-1082002</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin @ Palmer Web Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pagination-and-duplicate-content-issues/7204/#comment-1082002</guid>
		<description>Ann,

I have successfully used method #1 for some time. Initially, I was worried that pages would take too long to load if there was too many products. However, I found through a/b testing that visitors were willing to wait. In fact, I&#039;ve successfully used this method on product category pages with over 100 products.

More and more I&#039;m finding that this method is preferable not just from an SEO view, but for website usability. Paging irritates people, as they have to navigate those tiny 1,2,3... links and they sometimes miss them all together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann,</p>
<p>I have successfully used method #1 for some time. Initially, I was worried that pages would take too long to load if there was too many products. However, I found through a/b testing that visitors were willing to wait. In fact, I&#8217;ve successfully used this method on product category pages with over 100 products.</p>
<p>More and more I&#8217;m finding that this method is preferable not just from an SEO view, but for website usability. Paging irritates people, as they have to navigate those tiny 1,2,3&#8230; links and they sometimes miss them all together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Shotland</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pagination-and-duplicate-content-issues/7204/comment-page-1/#comment-1081989</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Shotland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pagination-and-duplicate-content-issues/7204/#comment-1081989</guid>
		<description>Sites that use the pagination technique for page views may be fooling themselves.  I just worked on a site that has thousands of page 2s+ but when I looked at the analytics I found that these extra pages only accounted for 2% of their page views and &lt;0.5% of their entry pages.  It didn&#039;t seem like it would be a big loss to get rid of these and the SEO and user benfits of putting everything on one page might be a lot greater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sites that use the pagination technique for page views may be fooling themselves.  I just worked on a site that has thousands of page 2s+ but when I looked at the analytics I found that these extra pages only accounted for 2% of their page views and &lt;0.5% of their entry pages.  It didn&#8217;t seem like it would be a big loss to get rid of these and the SEO and user benfits of putting everything on one page might be a lot greater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pagination-and-duplicate-content-issues/7204/comment-page-1/#comment-1081986</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pagination-and-duplicate-content-issues/7204/#comment-1081986</guid>
		<description>This type of duplicate content does not incur penalties in search results.  It usually only affects queries where the titles and/or meta descriptions are similar enough that the search engine may omit some of the pages (typically in SITE searches).

For people who expect their users to use a major engine for site search, this is a major duplicate content problem.  You absolutely need unique titles and meta descriptions for effective third-party site search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This type of duplicate content does not incur penalties in search results.  It usually only affects queries where the titles and/or meta descriptions are similar enough that the search engine may omit some of the pages (typically in SITE searches).</p>
<p>For people who expect their users to use a major engine for site search, this is a major duplicate content problem.  You absolutely need unique titles and meta descriptions for effective third-party site search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guia</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pagination-and-duplicate-content-issues/7204/comment-page-1/#comment-1081974</link>
		<dc:creator>guia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pagination-and-duplicate-content-issues/7204/#comment-1081974</guid>
		<description>There is a lot of duplicate content that we experienced right now.Some of the link value of your site will be spent on pages that don&#039;t get indexed. If you eliminate the duplicate content, this link power will be distributed only among pages that will get indexed, resulting in a potential improvement in the ranking of those pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a lot of duplicate content that we experienced right now.Some of the link value of your site will be spent on pages that don&#8217;t get indexed. If you eliminate the duplicate content, this link power will be distributed only among pages that will get indexed, resulting in a potential improvement in the ranking of those pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BottomTurn</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pagination-and-duplicate-content-issues/7204/comment-page-1/#comment-1081971</link>
		<dc:creator>BottomTurn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 10:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/pagination-and-duplicate-content-issues/7204/#comment-1081971</guid>
		<description>hello Ann,
we use mainly the first method, although it does not resolve the duplicated content&#039;s issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello Ann,<br />
we use mainly the first method, although it does not resolve the duplicated content&#8217;s issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
