<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Overture Site Match- Yahoo Search&#180;s Paid&#160;Inclusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/overture-site-match-yahoo-searchs-paid-inclusion/329/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/overture-site-match-yahoo-searchs-paid-inclusion/329/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windsor Exports</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/overture-site-match-yahoo-searchs-paid-inclusion/329/comment-page-1/#comment-1087902</link>
		<dc:creator>Windsor Exports</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=329#comment-1087902</guid>
		<description>Manufacturer and Supplier of Switches, Windsor Switches, Manufacturer Switches, Metal Switches, Push button switch, Switches Supplier. We are Trader Exporter Switches, Maker Switches, Switches India.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manufacturer and Supplier of Switches, Windsor Switches, Manufacturer Switches, Metal Switches, Push button switch, Switches Supplier. We are Trader Exporter Switches, Maker Switches, Switches India.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#111;nl&#105;n&#101; p&#111;k&#101;r</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/overture-site-match-yahoo-searchs-paid-inclusion/329/comment-page-1/#comment-34100</link>
		<dc:creator>&#111;nl&#105;n&#101; p&#111;k&#101;r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2005 10:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=329#comment-34100</guid>
		<description>I must say that I was surprised to find this web page, but - - - Good Job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say that I was surprised to find this web page, but &#8211; - &#8211; Good Job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#111;nl&#105;n&#101; p&#111;k&#101;r</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/overture-site-match-yahoo-searchs-paid-inclusion/329/comment-page-1/#comment-33188</link>
		<dc:creator>&#111;nl&#105;n&#101; p&#111;k&#101;r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2005 19:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=329#comment-33188</guid>
		<description>i really loved your site and found it to be very friendly and helpfull.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i really loved your site and found it to be very friendly and helpfull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/overture-site-match-yahoo-searchs-paid-inclusion/329/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=329#comment-195</guid>
		<description>A bold move that looks like LookSmart. I wonder how it will affect directory inclusion. Google is a winner on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bold move that looks like LookSmart. I wonder how it will affect directory inclusion. Google is a winner on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/overture-site-match-yahoo-searchs-paid-inclusion/329/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=329#comment-196</guid>
		<description>I would have favored a higher inclusion price for a shorter period of time and a longer rate of refreshing/spidering versus what they have done now.  If I want content realted material, I will search Google.  If I want products/services, I will use Froogle.  If I want to use Yahoo, then I will expect higher product/services costs to offset such costly marketing.  Google gets my search queries from now on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have favored a higher inclusion price for a shorter period of time and a longer rate of refreshing/spidering versus what they have done now.  If I want content realted material, I will search Google.  If I want products/services, I will use Froogle.  If I want to use Yahoo, then I will expect higher product/services costs to offset such costly marketing.  Google gets my search queries from now on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/overture-site-match-yahoo-searchs-paid-inclusion/329/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=329#comment-201</guid>
		<description>If Yahoo&#8217;s new service provides the same &#8220;high quality&#8221; of customer service that it has provided in the past, they are in for a rude awakening!
&lt;p&gt;
In the past, my clients have paid $299 for NO guarantee of inclusion, NO control of descriptions, NO control of directory placement and ZERO customer service. What can we expect for $49?
&lt;p&gt;
I really wonder!
&lt;p&gt;
I think Yahoo should stick w/ the $299 and add some guarantees, some control of descriptions and most importantly add some customer support!
&lt;p&gt;
Rich Blakemore
www.RichsWebDesign.com&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Yahoo&#8217;s new service provides the same &#8220;high quality&#8221; of customer service that it has provided in the past, they are in for a rude awakening!</p>
<p>
In the past, my clients have paid $299 for NO guarantee of inclusion, NO control of descriptions, NO control of directory placement and ZERO customer service. What can we expect for $49?
</p>
<p>
I really wonder!
</p>
<p>
I think Yahoo should stick w/ the $299 and add some guarantees, some control of descriptions and most importantly add some customer support!
</p>
<p>
Rich Blakemore<br />
<a href="http://www.RichsWebDesign.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.RichsWebDesign.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/overture-site-match-yahoo-searchs-paid-inclusion/329/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=329#comment-284</guid>
		<description>I suspect the back lash to Yahoo&#039;s greed will force them to return to the old flat rate paid indexing of Inktomi.  I used to spend a few thousand a year, but their new model is to costly. Now, I won&#039;t spend a dime, as I can get better PPC results from Overture, Google, and Findwhat.  Their greed will cost them money. Goodbye Yahoo site match.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect the back lash to Yahoo&#8217;s greed will force them to return to the old flat rate paid indexing of Inktomi.  I used to spend a few thousand a year, but their new model is to costly. Now, I won&#8217;t spend a dime, as I can get better PPC results from Overture, Google, and Findwhat.  Their greed will cost them money. Goodbye Yahoo site match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

