<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenOffice.org 2.0 Becoming the Next Mozilla&#160;Firefox?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/openofficeorg-20-becoming-the-next-mozilla-firefox/2361/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/openofficeorg-20-becoming-the-next-mozilla-firefox/2361/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/openofficeorg-20-becoming-the-next-mozilla-firefox/2361/comment-page-1/#comment-45862</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2361#comment-45862</guid>
		<description>Open Office 2.0 is great.  Unfortunately, it is still missing key features for word processing, including a Canadian English dictionary and a grammar checker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open Office 2.0 is great.  Unfortunately, it is still missing key features for word processing, including a Canadian English dictionary and a grammar checker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

