<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Product &#8211; Two Same-Language&#160;Countries?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:13:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Vanderhurst</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/comment-page-1/#comment-1099940</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Vanderhurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 11:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/#comment-1099940</guid>
		<description>wonderful post! another things learned from your post. Thank you for sharing it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wonderful post! another things learned from your post. Thank you for sharing it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Software Testing</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/comment-page-1/#comment-1083849</link>
		<dc:creator>Software Testing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/#comment-1083849</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ann :) Lets keep it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ann :) Lets keep it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Smarty</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/comment-page-1/#comment-1083780</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Smarty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/#comment-1083780</guid>
		<description>@Software Testing : actually I liked the post you are referring to, so if you don&#039;t mind, let&#039;s keep it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Software Testing : actually I liked the post you are referring to, so if you don&#8217;t mind, let&#8217;s keep it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Software Testing</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/comment-page-1/#comment-1083762</link>
		<dc:creator>Software Testing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 06:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/#comment-1083762</guid>
		<description>@ Ann, confused! sorry. If possible, remove the irrelevant link from my above comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ann, confused! sorry. If possible, remove the irrelevant link from my above comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Smarty</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/comment-page-1/#comment-1083761</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Smarty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 06:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/#comment-1083761</guid>
		<description>@Software Testing : huge thanks for the link! The post is great but it describes an opposite situation of targeting multilingual countries, while this one discusses targeting same-language countries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Software Testing : huge thanks for the link! The post is great but it describes an opposite situation of targeting multilingual countries, while this one discusses targeting same-language countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Software Testing</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/comment-page-1/#comment-1083760</link>
		<dc:creator>Software Testing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 06:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/#comment-1083760</guid>
		<description>May be the Google blog can answer the above questions,

http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/08/how-to-start-multilingual-site.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May be the Google blog can answer the above questions,</p>
<p><a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/08/how-to-start-multilingual-site.html" rel="nofollow">http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/08/how-to-start-multilingual-site.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinicius Paes</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/comment-page-1/#comment-1082848</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinicius Paes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/#comment-1082848</guid>
		<description>Hi Ann, great post, i also had the same problem with Brazil and Portugal. Nice tips!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ann, great post, i also had the same problem with Brazil and Portugal. Nice tips!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mevric</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/comment-page-1/#comment-1082811</link>
		<dc:creator>mevric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/#comment-1082811</guid>
		<description>great post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/comment-page-1/#comment-1082737</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/#comment-1082737</guid>
		<description>the uk/us debate is a little mute, as only 10-15% of uk users use the UK index directly. However both google and yahoo ip target their results, so that a uk user visiting google.com, will get uk boosted results (but not as much as the uk specific index), along with with uk based SEM.  A point missed in your discourse is the importance of US vs UK server IP addresses, both google and yahoo use the ip-address geo-location of your servers to further position the pages you are serving in its regionally boosted indexes. The largely ineffectual option in the webmaster tools was supposed to allow you to set the physical location of your domain, but i think some google engineer forgot to connect the check-box up to any actual code.  A final method is to use a technique known as TASER. a set of agent sensitive rewrite rules, that map the sites domain to the domain you wish it to be indexed as, but only for the bot. A corresponding set of non robot conditional rules map back the url&#039;s for people clicking through from the search engine, for certain situations it can be very effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the uk/us debate is a little mute, as only 10-15% of uk users use the UK index directly. However both google and yahoo ip target their results, so that a uk user visiting google.com, will get uk boosted results (but not as much as the uk specific index), along with with uk based SEM.  A point missed in your discourse is the importance of US vs UK server IP addresses, both google and yahoo use the ip-address geo-location of your servers to further position the pages you are serving in its regionally boosted indexes. The largely ineffectual option in the webmaster tools was supposed to allow you to set the physical location of your domain, but i think some google engineer forgot to connect the check-box up to any actual code.  A final method is to use a technique known as TASER. a set of agent sensitive rewrite rules, that map the sites domain to the domain you wish it to be indexed as, but only for the bot. A corresponding set of non robot conditional rules map back the url&#8217;s for people clicking through from the search engine, for certain situations it can be very effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/comment-page-1/#comment-1082733</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/one-product-two-same-language-countries/7294/#comment-1082733</guid>
		<description>Great to see you covering this - it&#039;s certainly a difficult challenge for websites owners who are interesting in geotargeting but awesome tips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to see you covering this &#8211; it&#8217;s certainly a difficult challenge for websites owners who are interesting in geotargeting but awesome tips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

