<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nofollow Leverages Mistrust Among&#160;People</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/nofollow-leverages-mistrust-among-people/4391/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/nofollow-leverages-mistrust-among-people/4391/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:48:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO in SG</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/nofollow-leverages-mistrust-among-people/4391/comment-page-1/#comment-1133922</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO in SG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4391#comment-1133922</guid>
		<description>Its ok.. as long as readers are sharing ideas and related to entry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its ok.. as long as readers are sharing ideas and related to entry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: online business blog</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/nofollow-leverages-mistrust-among-people/4391/comment-page-1/#comment-933788</link>
		<dc:creator>online business blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 12:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4391#comment-933788</guid>
		<description>&quot;Awaiting comment moderation&quot; is enough trustranking for me. There is No need for punishing approved comments..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Awaiting comment moderation&#8221; is enough trustranking for me. There is No need for punishing approved comments..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Web Design</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/nofollow-leverages-mistrust-among-people/4391/comment-page-1/#comment-917997</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4391#comment-917997</guid>
		<description>If i trust a site, why shouldn&#039;t i follow a link to it? Including a nofollow attribute would mean that i do  not trust the site and yet i wish to use that site as an additional resource to my article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If i trust a site, why shouldn&#8217;t i follow a link to it? Including a nofollow attribute would mean that i do  not trust the site and yet i wish to use that site as an additional resource to my article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Web Design</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/nofollow-leverages-mistrust-among-people/4391/comment-page-1/#comment-889801</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4391#comment-889801</guid>
		<description>A quote from my previous comment :

Should i &quot;dofollow&quot; a link to Google and &quot;nofollow&quot; a link to my clients or sponsors? Google it is time to wake up before losing the trust from webmasters whom contributed to what you are today. Have Google ever wonder what will happened if one day more than 60% of the sites block googlebot with their robots.txt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quote from my previous comment :</p>
<p>Should i &#8220;dofollow&#8221; a link to Google and &#8220;nofollow&#8221; a link to my clients or sponsors? Google it is time to wake up before losing the trust from webmasters whom contributed to what you are today. Have Google ever wonder what will happened if one day more than 60% of the sites block googlebot with their robots.txt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/nofollow-leverages-mistrust-among-people/4391/comment-page-1/#comment-389512</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4391#comment-389512</guid>
		<description>It is not a problem that the publisher of a blog post receives spam comment notification - that is how things should be.

If you use a subscribe to comments feature, if a spam comment gets through, it goes to everyone on the email subscription list before the blog post author has a chance to moderate it.

Spam complaints can do nasty things to your internet business, can can even affect other people.

If for instance AOL decided to blacklist a site, then it is quite likely that any RSS article, delivered by email, that contained a link to that site would also end up in the spam folder.

This type of thing frequently happens with large affiliate promotions. It is one of the reasons many affiliate managers insist that affiliates use their own redirect in emails, or register a suitable domain name to cloak an affiliate link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not a problem that the publisher of a blog post receives spam comment notification &#8211; that is how things should be.</p>
<p>If you use a subscribe to comments feature, if a spam comment gets through, it goes to everyone on the email subscription list before the blog post author has a chance to moderate it.</p>
<p>Spam complaints can do nasty things to your internet business, can can even affect other people.</p>
<p>If for instance AOL decided to blacklist a site, then it is quite likely that any RSS article, delivered by email, that contained a link to that site would also end up in the spam folder.</p>
<p>This type of thing frequently happens with large affiliate promotions. It is one of the reasons many affiliate managers insist that affiliates use their own redirect in emails, or register a suitable domain name to cloak an affiliate link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halfdeck</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/nofollow-leverages-mistrust-among-people/4391/comment-page-1/#comment-389438</link>
		<dc:creator>Halfdeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4391#comment-389438</guid>
		<description>Nofollow is a temporary bandage and far from a perfect fix, but it buys Google time while Googlers dig around for a better solution. Reality is that some paid links can never be algorithmically detected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nofollow is a temporary bandage and far from a perfect fix, but it buys Google time while Googlers dig around for a better solution. Reality is that some paid links can never be algorithmically detected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sushubh</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/nofollow-leverages-mistrust-among-people/4391/comment-page-1/#comment-388912</link>
		<dc:creator>Sushubh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4391#comment-388912</guid>
		<description>Nice article. nofollow has technically failed to discourage spammers from comment spamming on blogs. And it is used by RSS Script Blog Post generators to rip content without giving any attribution!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. nofollow has technically failed to discourage spammers from comment spamming on blogs. And it is used by RSS Script Blog Post generators to rip content without giving any attribution!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carsten Cumbrowski</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/nofollow-leverages-mistrust-among-people/4391/comment-page-1/#comment-388871</link>
		<dc:creator>Carsten Cumbrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4391#comment-388871</guid>
		<description>Just for the record. I do not agree with Loren&#039;s decision to have nofollow enabled for blog comments. In my opinion should he either turn it off or enable nofollow for every link from the site. It is his descision, because it is his site.

The ladder would be very radical and I don&#039;t suggest it to him. 

I don&#039;t know if SEJ is authority enough, like Wikipedia, to have the Search Engines take notice. 

It would harm him, as an individual too much, if they don&#039;t. A risk that is not worth taking. 

p.s.
I get an email for every comment that slips through the spam filter and check it. If it is spam like the one a few minutes ago for this post, I delete it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record. I do not agree with Loren&#8217;s decision to have nofollow enabled for blog comments. In my opinion should he either turn it off or enable nofollow for every link from the site. It is his descision, because it is his site.</p>
<p>The ladder would be very radical and I don&#8217;t suggest it to him. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if SEJ is authority enough, like Wikipedia, to have the Search Engines take notice. </p>
<p>It would harm him, as an individual too much, if they don&#8217;t. A risk that is not worth taking. </p>
<p>p.s.<br />
I get an email for every comment that slips through the spam filter and check it. If it is spam like the one a few minutes ago for this post, I delete it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/nofollow-leverages-mistrust-among-people/4391/comment-page-1/#comment-388803</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4391#comment-388803</guid>
		<description>Well this blog is currently using nofollow in a neutral way, &quot;I don&#039;t know whether I can trust them&quot; for user generated content.

Whilst I haven&#039;t been a regular reader for long, I don&#039;t recall seeing any pure spam comments, so there is a relatively good barrier, though there are always ways to improve that.

My biggest worry on spam comments isn&#039;t whether I am linking to a bad neighbourhood but whether a subscriber to comments would end up with a spam message that didn&#039;t get filtered.

I have added subscribe to comments, I just need to find time to hack the plugin to make it CAN SPAM complient, so if a blue pill comment does make it through, at least I have something to stand on.

You are actually one of the people who requested the ability to subscribe to comments

One reason to use nofollow is to prevent linking to bad neighbourhoods. I control that using a comments policy. If someone abuses it they lose their ability to comment.

Another use is controlling link juice within a domain.

I don&#039;t think it should be expanded, but I do think it shouldn&#039;t be used under any circumstance where someone is citing your content, or aggregating it in some way.

As for commercial links, that should be handled by disclosure and your relationship with your readers. Google are the only company that I am aware of that have unofficially suggested the use of nofollow for commercial links. It is something I won&#039;t do until I can effectively disclose that I get paid for referral units.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this blog is currently using nofollow in a neutral way, &#8220;I don&#8217;t know whether I can trust them&#8221; for user generated content.</p>
<p>Whilst I haven&#8217;t been a regular reader for long, I don&#8217;t recall seeing any pure spam comments, so there is a relatively good barrier, though there are always ways to improve that.</p>
<p>My biggest worry on spam comments isn&#8217;t whether I am linking to a bad neighbourhood but whether a subscriber to comments would end up with a spam message that didn&#8217;t get filtered.</p>
<p>I have added subscribe to comments, I just need to find time to hack the plugin to make it CAN SPAM complient, so if a blue pill comment does make it through, at least I have something to stand on.</p>
<p>You are actually one of the people who requested the ability to subscribe to comments</p>
<p>One reason to use nofollow is to prevent linking to bad neighbourhoods. I control that using a comments policy. If someone abuses it they lose their ability to comment.</p>
<p>Another use is controlling link juice within a domain.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it should be expanded, but I do think it shouldn&#8217;t be used under any circumstance where someone is citing your content, or aggregating it in some way.</p>
<p>As for commercial links, that should be handled by disclosure and your relationship with your readers. Google are the only company that I am aware of that have unofficially suggested the use of nofollow for commercial links. It is something I won&#8217;t do until I can effectively disclose that I get paid for referral units.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter van der Graaf</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/nofollow-leverages-mistrust-among-people/4391/comment-page-1/#comment-388792</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter van der Graaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4391#comment-388792</guid>
		<description>Nofollow gives you the possibility to link to untrusted sources without being associated with them. But as more and more websites start using nofollow for all/most of their links, how can search engines accurately define what a website is about? And why shouldn&#039;t search engines just follow nofollow links to still associate your website with them? Nofollow may work so far, but things are bound to change.
I think &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vdgraaf.info/nofollow-is-a-leaky-condom.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nofollow is a leaky condom&lt;/a&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nofollow gives you the possibility to link to untrusted sources without being associated with them. But as more and more websites start using nofollow for all/most of their links, how can search engines accurately define what a website is about? And why shouldn&#8217;t search engines just follow nofollow links to still associate your website with them? Nofollow may work so far, but things are bound to change.<br />
I think <a href="http://www.vdgraaf.info/nofollow-is-a-leaky-condom.html" rel="nofollow">Nofollow is a leaky condom</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

