<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Stumbleupon&#160;Interface</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:28:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: travisdeloscosmos</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/comment-page-1/#comment-1139359</link>
		<dc:creator>travisdeloscosmos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/#comment-1139359</guid>
		<description>Has anyone else found that they can no longer stumble thru youtube or break or wikipedia, or any of the &quot;stumblethru&quot; options that there used to be? You can still break it down by category, but if they made a new version, why would they take away features?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone else found that they can no longer stumble thru youtube or break or wikipedia, or any of the &#8220;stumblethru&#8221; options that there used to be? You can still break it down by category, but if they made a new version, why would they take away features?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sign Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/comment-page-1/#comment-822295</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sign Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 19:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/#comment-822295</guid>
		<description>Stumbleupon.com is great, I am addicted</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stumbleupon.com is great, I am addicted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarstenCumbrowski</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/comment-page-1/#comment-564019</link>
		<dc:creator>CarstenCumbrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 02:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/#comment-564019</guid>
		<description>Matt: It seems like it, because it changed for my account in the night between the 19th and 20th. I was not part of the closed beta and also did not sign up for any closed or public beta. 

I actually had problems with the old interface and it was harder to get to certain stuff, even if you knew that it existed. I noticed in the new interface right away that a number of these problems were addressed and a number of sections are now much easier accessible than they were before.

I did not had the oposite case yet, where I can&#039;t find it easily in the new interace, but were able to access it without problems from the old one. Did you or anybody else noticed cases like this? If you do, let me know. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt: It seems like it, because it changed for my account in the night between the 19th and 20th. I was not part of the closed beta and also did not sign up for any closed or public beta. </p>
<p>I actually had problems with the old interface and it was harder to get to certain stuff, even if you knew that it existed. I noticed in the new interface right away that a number of these problems were addressed and a number of sections are now much easier accessible than they were before.</p>
<p>I did not had the oposite case yet, where I can&#8217;t find it easily in the new interace, but were able to access it without problems from the old one. Did you or anybody else noticed cases like this? If you do, let me know. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Keegan</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/comment-page-1/#comment-563620</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Keegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/#comment-563620</guid>
		<description>I  believe this BETA has been available for some time as I have been using a new StumbleUpon interface for weeks now. Perhaps they made it universally available to users?

I like the interface too, but I can see where someone might want to access the old one, given its familiar look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  believe this BETA has been available for some time as I have been using a new StumbleUpon interface for weeks now. Perhaps they made it universally available to users?</p>
<p>I like the interface too, but I can see where someone might want to access the old one, given its familiar look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALLIE</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/comment-page-1/#comment-563571</link>
		<dc:creator>ALLIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/#comment-563571</guid>
		<description>I RELLY LIKE NEW SETUP..ALSO THAT I CAN REVERT TO THE OLD NE IF I NEED..  AS I&#039;M PARTIALLY SIGHTED,I APPRECIATETHE BRIGHT DEFINITION OF PAGES..ENJOYING STUMBLES..ALL AGES...WORLDWIDE...BRILLIANT...!! THANKS !  CUPPA :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I RELLY LIKE NEW SETUP..ALSO THAT I CAN REVERT TO THE OLD NE IF I NEED..  AS I&#8217;M PARTIALLY SIGHTED,I APPRECIATETHE BRIGHT DEFINITION OF PAGES..ENJOYING STUMBLES..ALL AGES&#8230;WORLDWIDE&#8230;BRILLIANT&#8230;!! THANKS !  CUPPA :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luke</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/comment-page-1/#comment-562870</link>
		<dc:creator>luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/#comment-562870</guid>
		<description>It seems too cluttered to me.  Thats the only thing wrong with it.  I still like the old interface better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems too cluttered to me.  Thats the only thing wrong with it.  I still like the old interface better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smallman</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/comment-page-1/#comment-562829</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/#comment-562829</guid>
		<description>I had been using the Beta of the StumbleUpon UI for quite a while, and I really like it.

This post of yours is quite a coincidence, because I&#039;ve got a couple of StumbleUpon articles in the pipeline, so I may make reference here.

Oh BTW, there&#039;s no need to thank me for commenting! It&#039;s a pleasure...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had been using the Beta of the StumbleUpon UI for quite a while, and I really like it.</p>
<p>This post of yours is quite a coincidence, because I&#8217;ve got a couple of StumbleUpon articles in the pipeline, so I may make reference here.</p>
<p>Oh BTW, there&#8217;s no need to thank me for commenting! It&#8217;s a pleasure&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarstenCumbrowski</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/comment-page-1/#comment-562775</link>
		<dc:creator>CarstenCumbrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/#comment-562775</guid>
		<description>Wayne: 

Tell me about it. some companies don&#039;t appreciate the fact that somebody takes the time to provide a feedback and makes suggestions.... FREE.  

If the suggestion is already in the making, just say it... I would be happy to hear that, because I make the suggestion for a reason.. I would like to have that option/feature etc.  

It&#039;s unbelievable sometime. Fortunately are there still good examples to be found. Usually the smaller and less known services, the start-ups... when they grow big and fat, they often grow ugly along with it and forget their roots from time to time.

Thanks for the comment btw. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wayne: </p>
<p>Tell me about it. some companies don&#8217;t appreciate the fact that somebody takes the time to provide a feedback and makes suggestions&#8230;. FREE.  </p>
<p>If the suggestion is already in the making, just say it&#8230; I would be happy to hear that, because I make the suggestion for a reason.. I would like to have that option/feature etc.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s unbelievable sometime. Fortunately are there still good examples to be found. Usually the smaller and less known services, the start-ups&#8230; when they grow big and fat, they often grow ugly along with it and forget their roots from time to time.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment btw. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smallman</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/comment-page-1/#comment-562765</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/#comment-562765</guid>
		<description>I made a few comments about the general layout of StumbleUpon on a forum over there some weeks ago and got stonewalled.

Fast forward a week and guess what? The ideas I put forward have in part been implemented.

I&#039;m not saying I was taken seriously, because their work must have been well underway at that point.

But I just find it odd the attitude some have with regards to suggestions that mirror their plans.

Not every idea needs to be intrinsically new to be good...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made a few comments about the general layout of StumbleUpon on a forum over there some weeks ago and got stonewalled.</p>
<p>Fast forward a week and guess what? The ideas I put forward have in part been implemented.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying I was taken seriously, because their work must have been well underway at that point.</p>
<p>But I just find it odd the attitude some have with regards to suggestions that mirror their plans.</p>
<p>Not every idea needs to be intrinsically new to be good&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: testi</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/comment-page-1/#comment-562535</link>
		<dc:creator>testi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 05:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-stumbleupon-interface/5506/#comment-562535</guid>
		<description>StumbleUpon is the best way to discover great websites, videos, photos, blogs and more. Channel surf the internet and get personalized recommendations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>StumbleUpon is the best way to discover great websites, videos, photos, blogs and more. Channel surf the internet and get personalized recommendations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

