Comments on: Mike Grehan Wants You! http://www.searchenginejournal.com/mike-grehan-wants-you/3274/ Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:28:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: SEARCH ENGINES WEB http://www.searchenginejournal.com/mike-grehan-wants-you/3274/comment-page-1/#comment-87941 SEARCH ENGINES WEB Mon, 17 Apr 2006 22:32:32 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3274#comment-87941 Probably depends on how COMPETATIVE the Search Term is, that they are attempting rankings with. Keeping an Archive of the SERPs for the query: SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION (which is possibly the most competatively, strategic, continually SEO-ed term) you can see which strategies worked years ago, that mean nothing now by the changes in the rankings of those SEO firms. So, depending on how many others are using those same strategies for a term PLUS how competative that term is, will factor in who rises above one another. Since everyone is tenaciously doing the same thing....every little bit counts! Incorporating, those Web 2.0 tactics may give the leading edge. For non competative terms: Titles, Body keywords and Back links keywords appear to be ample. If you were a SE Engineer...What would you do? Probably depends on how COMPETATIVE the Search Term is, that they are attempting rankings with.

Keeping an Archive of the SERPs for the query: SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION
(which is possibly the most competatively, strategic, continually SEO-ed term) you can see which strategies worked years ago, that mean nothing now by the changes in the rankings of those SEO firms.

So, depending on how many others are using those same strategies for a term
PLUS how competative that term is,
will factor in who rises above one another. Since everyone is tenaciously doing the same thing….every little bit counts!
Incorporating, those Web 2.0 tactics may give the leading edge.

For non competative terms: Titles, Body keywords and Back links keywords appear to be ample.

If you were a SE Engineer…What would you do?

]]>