<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#8217;s Google Search Killer Strategy is a Rewards&#160;Program?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsofts-google-search-killer-strategy-is-a-rewards-program/6948/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsofts-google-search-killer-strategy-is-a-rewards-program/6948/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:21:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Replacement Windows Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsofts-google-search-killer-strategy-is-a-rewards-program/6948/comment-page-1/#comment-1092844</link>
		<dc:creator>Replacement Windows Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsofts-google-search-killer-strategy-is-a-rewards-program/6948/#comment-1092844</guid>
		<description>If this makes you money why not? Give it a try. I know if I had money rolling in I would&#039;nt be bad mouthing Microsoft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this makes you money why not? Give it a try. I know if I had money rolling in I would&#8217;nt be bad mouthing Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Stack</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsofts-google-search-killer-strategy-is-a-rewards-program/6948/comment-page-1/#comment-1078294</link>
		<dc:creator>John Stack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 14:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsofts-google-search-killer-strategy-is-a-rewards-program/6948/#comment-1078294</guid>
		<description>A looming question - all of this cross marketing stuff is great but how does a spaces user leverage this?  I can&#039;t even get my spaces blog to be recognized by google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A looming question &#8211; all of this cross marketing stuff is great but how does a spaces user leverage this?  I can&#8217;t even get my spaces blog to be recognized by google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hull Web Design</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsofts-google-search-killer-strategy-is-a-rewards-program/6948/comment-page-1/#comment-1077347</link>
		<dc:creator>Hull Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsofts-google-search-killer-strategy-is-a-rewards-program/6948/#comment-1077347</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think this will get people using live search right away.  But certainly as people cotton on and realise they can get a cheaper deal for a product they might have already found on google, more and more people will take the extra time to go to live search.  Obviously its a horrible way to gather more users, because it doesn&#039;t help search results get any better.  But to call it amaturish... hmm, I&#039;d have my reservations about that.  If the process of getting cashback is quick, easy and reliable and if the rewards are worth the extra time... then this could actually be something that works quite well for MSFT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this will get people using live search right away.  But certainly as people cotton on and realise they can get a cheaper deal for a product they might have already found on google, more and more people will take the extra time to go to live search.  Obviously its a horrible way to gather more users, because it doesn&#8217;t help search results get any better.  But to call it amaturish&#8230; hmm, I&#8217;d have my reservations about that.  If the process of getting cashback is quick, easy and reliable and if the rewards are worth the extra time&#8230; then this could actually be something that works quite well for MSFT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James T. Dolan</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsofts-google-search-killer-strategy-is-a-rewards-program/6948/comment-page-1/#comment-1077268</link>
		<dc:creator>James T. Dolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 15:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsofts-google-search-killer-strategy-is-a-rewards-program/6948/#comment-1077268</guid>
		<description>This is amateurish or desperation to those who see search as some sort of technical and academic pursuit. But to the people who use search engines to find stuff to buy (the people who actually click on the ads, unlike you and I) this is exactly what they want. Advertisers pay to get results. Consumers search to buy products and services at the best price. Geeks and techies are somewhere in the mix, but they aren&#039;t responsible for Google&#039;s profits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is amateurish or desperation to those who see search as some sort of technical and academic pursuit. But to the people who use search engines to find stuff to buy (the people who actually click on the ads, unlike you and I) this is exactly what they want. Advertisers pay to get results. Consumers search to buy products and services at the best price. Geeks and techies are somewhere in the mix, but they aren&#8217;t responsible for Google&#8217;s profits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsofts-google-search-killer-strategy-is-a-rewards-program/6948/comment-page-1/#comment-1077246</link>
		<dc:creator>CT Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsofts-google-search-killer-strategy-is-a-rewards-program/6948/#comment-1077246</guid>
		<description>Hm, MSFT thinking: throw enough money at things and they&#039;ll stick. I can&#039;t believe they&#039;ve seemed to have overlooked all those lotto search engines that never take off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, MSFT thinking: throw enough money at things and they&#8217;ll stick. I can&#8217;t believe they&#8217;ve seemed to have overlooked all those lotto search engines that never take off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nivash kumar</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsofts-google-search-killer-strategy-is-a-rewards-program/6948/comment-page-1/#comment-1077244</link>
		<dc:creator>nivash kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsofts-google-search-killer-strategy-is-a-rewards-program/6948/#comment-1077244</guid>
		<description>Do you say microsoft isn&#039;t playing the game right? They always wanted to enter markets where computers are used, literally they want to conquer the world of computers with their monopoly. Now in search market also. Let&#039;s wait n watch them on Web 2.0 also for further amateurish things like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you say microsoft isn&#8217;t playing the game right? They always wanted to enter markets where computers are used, literally they want to conquer the world of computers with their monopoly. Now in search market also. Let&#8217;s wait n watch them on Web 2.0 also for further amateurish things like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

