<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Search Worries Google and&#160;Yahoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsoft-search-worries-google-and-yahoo/131/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsoft-search-worries-google-and-yahoo/131/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:48:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: p&#111;k&#101;r</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsoft-search-worries-google-and-yahoo/131/comment-page-1/#comment-33860</link>
		<dc:creator>p&#111;k&#101;r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2005 18:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=131#comment-33860</guid>
		<description>I like your website I will share this with friends</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your website I will share this with friends</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: p&#111;k&#101;r</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsoft-search-worries-google-and-yahoo/131/comment-page-1/#comment-33859</link>
		<dc:creator>p&#111;k&#101;r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2005 18:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=131#comment-33859</guid>
		<description>I like your website I will share this with friends</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your website I will share this with friends</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#111;nl&#105;n&#101; g&#97;mbl&#105;ng</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsoft-search-worries-google-and-yahoo/131/comment-page-1/#comment-22034</link>
		<dc:creator>&#111;nl&#105;n&#101; g&#97;mbl&#105;ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=131#comment-22034</guid>
		<description>Wow! I didn&#039;t know that site was that good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! I didn&#8217;t know that site was that good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brain</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsoft-search-worries-google-and-yahoo/131/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=131#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Just what we need, Microstuf telling us what to do with our searches.

It&#039;s bad enough that they&#039;ve disabled the use of Cloned drives for easy back-ups in XP.  IS Techs who actually have to maintain computers understand the value of a cloned drive, when they have to support numerious systems.  

Microstuf XP is HORRIBLE on searches.  I&#039;ve had a folder open on the local harddrive open &amp; was looking at the file, &amp; XP couldn&#039;t find it with a search of the hard drive...      

This gives me NO FAITH that their internet search will be any better...

i.e. 6 the least secure ever......!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what we need, Microstuf telling us what to do with our searches.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s bad enough that they&#8217;ve disabled the use of Cloned drives for easy back-ups in XP.  IS Techs who actually have to maintain computers understand the value of a cloned drive, when they have to support numerious systems.  </p>
<p>Microstuf XP is HORRIBLE on searches.  I&#8217;ve had a folder open on the local harddrive open &#38; was looking at the file, &#38; XP couldn&#8217;t find it with a search of the hard drive&#8230;      </p>
<p>This gives me NO FAITH that their internet search will be any better&#8230;</p>
<p>i.e. 6 the least secure ever&#8230;&#8230;!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

