http://www.searchenginejournal.com/matt-cutts-ses-san-jose/12509/ Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:28:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= http://www.searchenginejournal.com/matt-cutts-ses-san-jose/12509/comment-page-1/#comment-1108287 Linda Crawford Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:53:15 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=12509#comment-1108287 So sorry I missed Matt. I enjoyed several of the site clinic's, especially Tim Ash. I've never really bought into the whole no follow theory. If you give someone a link it should always be because it's of value to your user. Nice summary. It would be fun to see Matt's shaved head...I did notice a lot of that look at SES this week. Us ladies of search all commented on it. We thought maybe it was a secret club of SEO experts. So sorry I missed Matt. I enjoyed several of the site clinic’s, especially Tim Ash. I’ve never really bought into the whole no follow theory. If you give someone a link it should always be because it’s of value to your user. Nice summary. It would be fun to see Matt’s shaved head…I did notice a lot of that look at SES this week. Us ladies of search all commented on it. We thought maybe it was a secret club of SEO experts.

]]> http://www.searchenginejournal.com/matt-cutts-ses-san-jose/12509/comment-page-1/#comment-1108256 James Montgomerie Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:30:47 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=12509#comment-1108256 Interesting article, particularly the point regarding multiple domains. I did not realise the .info domains were associated with spamming. Interesting article, particularly the point regarding multiple domains. I did not realise the .info domains were associated with spamming.

]]> http://www.searchenginejournal.com/matt-cutts-ses-san-jose/12509/comment-page-1/#comment-1108242 Aussie Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:23:16 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=12509#comment-1108242 Who edits the editor ? Who edits the editor ?

]]>