<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Matt Cutts : Google &amp; SEO&#160;Interviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/matt-cutts-google-seo-interviews/2679/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/matt-cutts-google-seo-interviews/2679/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:23:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim D. Sounder</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/matt-cutts-google-seo-interviews/2679/comment-page-1/#comment-97213</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim D. Sounder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 03:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2679#comment-97213</guid>
		<description>But where will the blog lead us?  Maybe it focus too much on content, entering the next age of content spam!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But where will the blog lead us?  Maybe it focus too much on content, entering the next age of content spam!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gratis Annoncer - jobsÃ¸gning, boliger, begivenheder, kultur</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/matt-cutts-google-seo-interviews/2679/comment-page-1/#comment-57041</link>
		<dc:creator>Gratis Annoncer - jobsÃ¸gning, boliger, begivenheder, kultur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 16:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2679#comment-57041</guid>
		<description>I checked out mattaholic, no information, no point, just some pathetic ego boosting !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I checked out mattaholic, no information, no point, just some pathetic ego boosting !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladimir A. Toman</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/matt-cutts-google-seo-interviews/2679/comment-page-1/#comment-55372</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladimir A. Toman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2679#comment-55372</guid>
		<description>The world&#039;s most powerful search engine (it isn&#039;t the Big G, by the way) defines SEO:
A Search Engine Optimizer is one who makes (a computer program used to (thoroughly look into (websites) in an effort to find (information))) as perfect, effective, or functional as possible.

Mr. Cutt&#039;s has yet to demonstrate a /true/ effort in fulfilling the definition of SEO.

Mr. Larry Page looks at this way:
&quot;Well, Larry Page, one of the co-founders of Google, is not very satisfied with the results of Google searches.

On a scale of 1 to 10, he thinks that Google delivers about a 3. They want to do everything they can to improve the quality of search.&quot;

Perhaps Mr. Cutts should spend less time blogging bloggery and more time in his cubical conducting information analysis and keying code.

Apparently, the term professionalism is too loosely implied these days.  My standards are more in line with his boss&#039;s, not with Mr. Cutt&#039;s.

Where does your (used generically) /standards/ lay, &quot;3&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world&#8217;s most powerful search engine (it isn&#8217;t the Big G, by the way) defines SEO:<br />
A Search Engine Optimizer is one who makes (a computer program used to (thoroughly look into (websites) in an effort to find (information))) as perfect, effective, or functional as possible.</p>
<p>Mr. Cutt&#8217;s has yet to demonstrate a /true/ effort in fulfilling the definition of SEO.</p>
<p>Mr. Larry Page looks at this way:<br />
&#8220;Well, Larry Page, one of the co-founders of Google, is not very satisfied with the results of Google searches.</p>
<p>On a scale of 1 to 10, he thinks that Google delivers about a 3. They want to do everything they can to improve the quality of search.&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps Mr. Cutts should spend less time blogging bloggery and more time in his cubical conducting information analysis and keying code.</p>
<p>Apparently, the term professionalism is too loosely implied these days.  My standards are more in line with his boss&#8217;s, not with Mr. Cutt&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Where does your (used generically) /standards/ lay, &#8220;3&#8243;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engines Web</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/matt-cutts-google-seo-interviews/2679/comment-page-1/#comment-55311</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engines Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2679#comment-55311</guid>
		<description>original content, valued earned links, and natural language text

///natural language text
Theoretically, that &quot;sounds sound&quot; but in reality natural language text when curling up with a good book, has a totally different effect when competing with ADS Animations and Scrolling norms of the virtual world - many time Bullets and hooks related the information in a digestable manner.

///valued earned links
One has to be in a position to be noticed to get the value added links - for most people aggressive link marketing is the only way the average Joe can get a foothold

///original content
What can the average Joe get access to that is original that the Giants can not have already have accessed - the only other option is to become provacative for the sake of being different and attention getting - unique content does not neccessarily mean valid content.

One possible answer would be for Google and others to understand, communicate and present measurable options to new Website owners, that would allow them to get a chance to become competative initially.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>original content, valued earned links, and natural language text</p>
<p>///natural language text<br />
Theoretically, that &#8220;sounds sound&#8221; but in reality natural language text when curling up with a good book, has a totally different effect when competing with ADS Animations and Scrolling norms of the virtual world &#8211; many time Bullets and hooks related the information in a digestable manner.</p>
<p>///valued earned links<br />
One has to be in a position to be noticed to get the value added links &#8211; for most people aggressive link marketing is the only way the average Joe can get a foothold</p>
<p>///original content<br />
What can the average Joe get access to that is original that the Giants can not have already have accessed &#8211; the only other option is to become provacative for the sake of being different and attention getting &#8211; unique content does not neccessarily mean valid content.</p>
<p>One possible answer would be for Google and others to understand, communicate and present measurable options to new Website owners, that would allow them to get a chance to become competative initially.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

