<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Made for &#8220;Text Link Ads&#8221; vs. Made for&#160;AdSense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/made-for-text-link-ads-vs-made-for-adsense/4968/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/made-for-text-link-ads-vs-made-for-adsense/4968/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macnerdzcare</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/made-for-text-link-ads-vs-made-for-adsense/4968/comment-page-1/#comment-798941</link>
		<dc:creator>Macnerdzcare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/made-for-text-link-ads-vs-made-for-adsense/4968/#comment-798941</guid>
		<description>very well said.. pagerank is a marketing strategy for the benifit of google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very well said.. pagerank is a marketing strategy for the benifit of google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mukesh</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/made-for-text-link-ads-vs-made-for-adsense/4968/comment-page-1/#comment-474856</link>
		<dc:creator>Mukesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 04:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/made-for-text-link-ads-vs-made-for-adsense/4968/#comment-474856</guid>
		<description>You said it..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mubin</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/made-for-text-link-ads-vs-made-for-adsense/4968/comment-page-1/#comment-473077</link>
		<dc:creator>Mubin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 15:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/made-for-text-link-ads-vs-made-for-adsense/4968/#comment-473077</guid>
		<description>Its interesting to note that Google doesn&#039;t endorse the PR system very publicly.  A regular internet user probably doesn&#039;t even know what PR is.  Its just a trap for us webmasters.  We buy links to increase our PR so that we can sell links to people that want to increase their PR so that they can sell links to people that want to increase their PR.

It&#039;s Made for Text Link Arbitrage...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its interesting to note that Google doesn&#8217;t endorse the PR system very publicly.  A regular internet user probably doesn&#8217;t even know what PR is.  Its just a trap for us webmasters.  We buy links to increase our PR so that we can sell links to people that want to increase their PR so that they can sell links to people that want to increase their PR.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s Made for Text Link Arbitrage&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mukesh</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/made-for-text-link-ads-vs-made-for-adsense/4968/comment-page-1/#comment-470939</link>
		<dc:creator>Mukesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 12:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/made-for-text-link-ads-vs-made-for-adsense/4968/#comment-470939</guid>
		<description>Hi Mubin, I tink waiting for three long months is not fun, but torture; especially when you find out tat your efforts did not pay off well cause of a google glitch. 

The whole PR system is outdated and sounds rather silly in the present context.  I think it is high time google starts showing us the real PR: with real figures/numbers than jst a flat &#039;guess it yourself&#039; stuff which is being presented to webmasters currently.  Google also needs to be more responsible towards showing correct PR values, as there is a major industry running out here based on it&#039;s PR system. (Look at wat I hav created!) 

I am not sure if showing accurate PR will increase the link spam rate, but atleast the webmaster&#039;s money is going to be well spent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mubin, I tink waiting for three long months is not fun, but torture; especially when you find out tat your efforts did not pay off well cause of a google glitch. </p>
<p>The whole PR system is outdated and sounds rather silly in the present context.  I think it is high time google starts showing us the real PR: with real figures/numbers than jst a flat &#8216;guess it yourself&#8217; stuff which is being presented to webmasters currently.  Google also needs to be more responsible towards showing correct PR values, as there is a major industry running out here based on it&#8217;s PR system. (Look at wat I hav created!) </p>
<p>I am not sure if showing accurate PR will increase the link spam rate, but atleast the webmaster&#8217;s money is going to be well spent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mubin</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/made-for-text-link-ads-vs-made-for-adsense/4968/comment-page-1/#comment-470915</link>
		<dc:creator>Mubin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 11:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/made-for-text-link-ads-vs-made-for-adsense/4968/#comment-470915</guid>
		<description>If google updated on a weekly basis all the fun would be gone... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If google updated on a weekly basis all the fun would be gone&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mukesh</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/made-for-text-link-ads-vs-made-for-adsense/4968/comment-page-1/#comment-470819</link>
		<dc:creator>Mukesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 08:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/made-for-text-link-ads-vs-made-for-adsense/4968/#comment-470819</guid>
		<description>Getting a good pagerank is the major problem. And jst like MFA sites hav an uncertain future, PR has an uncertain future too. The PR can drop any moment bringing your revenues to zero. And it is way too much effort to get links via link building. 

Jst like arbitrage sites for PPC ads, we wud need to buy links from text ad networks, get a PR and then sell links and try to make a top off profit. Seems like a time consuming activity. In case of MFA sites all tis happens in a matter of minutes.

If only google updated PR on a weekly basis. But the good old days are gone..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting a good pagerank is the major problem. And jst like MFA sites hav an uncertain future, PR has an uncertain future too. The PR can drop any moment bringing your revenues to zero. And it is way too much effort to get links via link building. </p>
<p>Jst like arbitrage sites for PPC ads, we wud need to buy links from text ad networks, get a PR and then sell links and try to make a top off profit. Seems like a time consuming activity. In case of MFA sites all tis happens in a matter of minutes.</p>
<p>If only google updated PR on a weekly basis. But the good old days are gone..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

