<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linking and Off-page SEO Most Important to Search&#160;Engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/linking-and-off-page-seo-most-important-to-search-engines/3640/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/linking-and-off-page-seo-most-important-to-search-engines/3640/</link>
	<description>Latest Search Engine News from the Search Engine Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:06:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kristen Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/linking-and-off-page-seo-most-important-to-search-engines/3640/comment-page-1/#comment-221709</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristen Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3640#comment-221709</guid>
		<description>It would have been nice to see a wider comparison. Perhaps a less competitive key phrase alongside this competitive key phrase. 

Valuable information, but the sample size is much to small to be conclusive. 

The study does strengthen my own approach to SEO / SEM. Each S/E is different and link quality is gaining more importance by the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would have been nice to see a wider comparison. Perhaps a less competitive key phrase alongside this competitive key phrase. </p>
<p>Valuable information, but the sample size is much to small to be conclusive. </p>
<p>The study does strengthen my own approach to SEO / SEM. Each S/E is different and link quality is gaining more importance by the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine WEB</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/linking-and-off-page-seo-most-important-to-search-engines/3640/comment-page-1/#comment-220910</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine WEB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3640#comment-220910</guid>
		<description>What they appear to be saying is that TRUST RANK is now Replacing Link Popularity

A group of &#039;Trusted&#039; Sites will statistically mostly link to other Trusted sites - many of those sites will have high PageRanks and each link they give has credibility


The only flaw in this report is NOT including ASK.com - it would have been nice to compare their SSP/ExpertRank algos alongside of GYM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What they appear to be saying is that TRUST RANK is now Replacing Link Popularity</p>
<p>A group of &#8216;Trusted&#8217; Sites will statistically mostly link to other Trusted sites &#8211; many of those sites will have high PageRanks and each link they give has credibility</p>
<p>The only flaw in this report is NOT including ASK.com &#8211; it would have been nice to compare their SSP/ExpertRank algos alongside of GYM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
