Lawsuit Asks Google to Reveal Algorithm
U.K.-based KinderStart.com, a “search engine” for parents of young children, has sued Google on the basis that its organic search ranking apparently declined in March 2005, allegedly because it was unfairly “penalized” by Google. According to this Reuters article, the site lost “70 percent” of its organic traffic when it was “downgraded.” The lawsuit seeks financial damages and asks that Google reveal the methodology behind its Page Rank algorithm.
Having read only the coverage and not the actual complaint, I’m struck by a couple of things that are amazing about this lawsuit. First, I think it’s dead on arrival. I think the company probably knows this and either hopes for a nuisance settlement or is looking for publicity.
The suit contends that its rankings did not change on Yahoo!, MSN or other engines. But it seems to be saying that these other rankings don’t matter, because Google is responsible for the lion’s share of its traffic. There’s a sense of both dependence and entitlement here — and how search engine rankings can be “life or death” for an online business.
If Google were truly the only search engine and there were some unjustly punitive action that was directed toward KinderStart (and provable), perhaps this claim might have a chance. (Even then the damages would be highly speculative.) But given that there is a competitive marketplace and other engines can equally be used to find KinderStart, it’s unlikely that any court would rule in KinderStart’s favor. Think about the precedent: It would be the end of organic search — every other site would litigate when its ranking fell. Finally, given that it’s a trade secret, KinderStart is also audacious in asking for Page Rank to be revealed. There’s zero chance that this aspect of the suit will succeed either.
Greg Sterling, Local Search and Convergence Columnist – Greg Sterling is managing editor of The Kelsey Group who also writes the Local Media Journal Blog.
Greg Sterling
Latest posts by Greg Sterling (see all)
- Google to Offer Embedded Maps for Webmasters - August 14, 2007
- Google & Yahoo : The Saviors of Newspapers - July 18, 2007
- eBay’s Kijiji Launches in the US, To Challenge Craigslist - July 5, 2007
I guess that invalid HTML and triple opening body tags, with one at the top that could easily be regexed by a crawler as a closing tag in their code didn’t have anything to do with it then?
Here you go!
No need for a lawsuit :-)
Pagerank algorithm published:
http://www-db.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html
http://dbpubs.stanford.edu:8090/pub/1999-66
Cheers!
- C
While I agree that KinderStart are unlikely to win this case, it will be interesting to see if they get Google’s algorithm disclosed.
The claim that they are making is that Google targeted them specifically and without reason which could be seen as anticompetitive. If this were the case then Google could be in trouble.
The trouble is that without knowing exactly what Google’s algorithm is it is impossible to prove one way or the other.
The court may see Google’s secrecy as withholding evidence which is a big no no, especially for information that should be protectable using Intellectual Property laws.