<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jason Calacanis Speaks About Digg, Netscape, SEO &amp; Pay Per Post&#160;Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/jason-calacanis-speaks-about-digg-netscape-seo-pay-per-post-blogging/4068/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/jason-calacanis-speaks-about-digg-netscape-seo-pay-per-post-blogging/4068/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:21:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HOBO SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/jason-calacanis-speaks-about-digg-netscape-seo-pay-per-post-blogging/4068/comment-page-1/#comment-454164</link>
		<dc:creator>HOBO SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4068#comment-454164</guid>
		<description>Well in Everret!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well in Everret!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marah Marie</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/jason-calacanis-speaks-about-digg-netscape-seo-pay-per-post-blogging/4068/comment-page-1/#comment-359724</link>
		<dc:creator>Marah Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4068#comment-359724</guid>
		<description>Goodness, how Jason *does* run on. Even old fogies like me (I&#039;m almost 36) think Netcape is an exact copy of Digg that only stops at the bad ad placement (right in the middle of the pages if I recall correctly -- I haven&#039;t seen Netscape since last summer).

Then you have:

&gt; â€ SEO is bullshit, if you generate a web page with good content Google will rank the page properly.â€

That made me laugh, along with his thoughts on the overall purity of Google (which he also chose to share on my blog for I don&#039;t know what reason). In my experience SEO *is* bullshit, agreed, but not for the reasons Jason thinks. The greatest content in the world without good backlinks is difficult to find in the results regardless of how much SEO surgery you perform on it, yet spam sites do well in Google with no decent backlinks at all and no one seems to know why (could it have something to do with the fact that most of them are Google Domains for Adsense sites?).

Then there&#039;s this gem:
 
&gt;Netscape has more uniques as Digg has more pages.

Now that&#039;s the salesman in Jason for sure. By his calculations, if my site has 37 pages, and Digg has 678,900, I&#039;m guaranteed *more* uniques than Digg because they have more pages to look at than I do. Nah-nah-a-boo-boo, take that, Digg -- really. 

Reality check: last time I looked at my counter, I wasn&#039;t getting over 500,000 uniques a day, and neither is Netscape.

&gt;Netscape is growing although Nick Denton keeps slamming us and saying it is going down.

It&#039;s doing well *in spite* of Nick? What an influential creature he must be! How&#039;s *that* for a conspiracy theory? Next Jason will blame him for World War II, the new Democratic Congress and rising crime rates, I suppose. It&#039;s all your fault, Nick! Just admit it. 

He said just one thing I like:

* Slimebuckets ruin each new industry and ruin it for everyone with spam, across the mediums of social news, seo &amp; email.

Maybe there&#039;s hope for him yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goodness, how Jason *does* run on. Even old fogies like me (I&#8217;m almost 36) think Netcape is an exact copy of Digg that only stops at the bad ad placement (right in the middle of the pages if I recall correctly &#8212; I haven&#8217;t seen Netscape since last summer).</p>
<p>Then you have:</p>
<p>&gt; â€ SEO is bullshit, if you generate a web page with good content Google will rank the page properly.â€</p>
<p>That made me laugh, along with his thoughts on the overall purity of Google (which he also chose to share on my blog for I don&#8217;t know what reason). In my experience SEO *is* bullshit, agreed, but not for the reasons Jason thinks. The greatest content in the world without good backlinks is difficult to find in the results regardless of how much SEO surgery you perform on it, yet spam sites do well in Google with no decent backlinks at all and no one seems to know why (could it have something to do with the fact that most of them are Google Domains for Adsense sites?).</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s this gem:</p>
<p>&gt;Netscape has more uniques as Digg has more pages.</p>
<p>Now that&#8217;s the salesman in Jason for sure. By his calculations, if my site has 37 pages, and Digg has 678,900, I&#8217;m guaranteed *more* uniques than Digg because they have more pages to look at than I do. Nah-nah-a-boo-boo, take that, Digg &#8212; really. </p>
<p>Reality check: last time I looked at my counter, I wasn&#8217;t getting over 500,000 uniques a day, and neither is Netscape.</p>
<p>&gt;Netscape is growing although Nick Denton keeps slamming us and saying it is going down.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s doing well *in spite* of Nick? What an influential creature he must be! How&#8217;s *that* for a conspiracy theory? Next Jason will blame him for World War II, the new Democratic Congress and rising crime rates, I suppose. It&#8217;s all your fault, Nick! Just admit it. </p>
<p>He said just one thing I like:</p>
<p>* Slimebuckets ruin each new industry and ruin it for everyone with spam, across the mediums of social news, seo &amp; email.</p>
<p>Maybe there&#8217;s hope for him yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nei l</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/jason-calacanis-speaks-about-digg-netscape-seo-pay-per-post-blogging/4068/comment-page-1/#comment-337862</link>
		<dc:creator>Nei l</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4068#comment-337862</guid>
		<description>@Everett  

Yes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Everett  </p>
<p>Yes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: revan</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/jason-calacanis-speaks-about-digg-netscape-seo-pay-per-post-blogging/4068/comment-page-1/#comment-335828</link>
		<dc:creator>revan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4068#comment-335828</guid>
		<description>Jason Calacanis, is stupid. Most imortant is links and number of pages, all other is BULLSHIT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason Calacanis, is stupid. Most imortant is links and number of pages, all other is BULLSHIT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/jason-calacanis-speaks-about-digg-netscape-seo-pay-per-post-blogging/4068/comment-page-1/#comment-331727</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Wilcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 17:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4068#comment-331727</guid>
		<description>Who gives a Keynote at a show where the attendees are SEO&#039;s, then tells them that &quot;SEO is Bullshit?&quot;

Ron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who gives a Keynote at a show where the attendees are SEO&#8217;s, then tells them that &#8220;SEO is Bullshit?&#8221;</p>
<p>Ron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sal Delvecio</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/jason-calacanis-speaks-about-digg-netscape-seo-pay-per-post-blogging/4068/comment-page-1/#comment-331725</link>
		<dc:creator>Sal Delvecio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 17:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4068#comment-331725</guid>
		<description>Who the hell is this guy anyway?  Netscape so copied digg it is not even funny.  SEO is bullshit?  What is the matter with this too bit leaker?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who the hell is this guy anyway?  Netscape so copied digg it is not even funny.  SEO is bullshit?  What is the matter with this too bit leaker?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cam Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/jason-calacanis-speaks-about-digg-netscape-seo-pay-per-post-blogging/4068/comment-page-1/#comment-331624</link>
		<dc:creator>Cam Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4068#comment-331624</guid>
		<description>I completely agree that writing good content is the absolute best way to generate traffic -- via search engines or word of mouth. However, in my own article on this topic (http://www.camturner.com/archives/how-to-meet-new-friends-traffic-generation-basics/) I also mention that you need to properly construct the website so that the search engines can make sense of it. Oh, and patience is key too. Getting good traffic from Google won&#039;t happen overnight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree that writing good content is the absolute best way to generate traffic &#8212; via search engines or word of mouth. However, in my own article on this topic (<a href="http://www.camturner.com/archives/how-to-meet-new-friends-traffic-generation-basics/" rel="nofollow">http://www.camturner.com/archives/how-to-meet-new-friends-traffic-generation-basics/</a>) I also mention that you need to properly construct the website so that the search engines can make sense of it. Oh, and patience is key too. Getting good traffic from Google won&#8217;t happen overnight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supermom_in_ny</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/jason-calacanis-speaks-about-digg-netscape-seo-pay-per-post-blogging/4068/comment-page-1/#comment-331299</link>
		<dc:creator>supermom_in_ny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 06:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4068#comment-331299</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why Jason Calacanis keeps directing so much animosity towards PayPerPost.  I&#039;m sure that he&#039;s aware that BLOGITIVE was the first company to offer average bloggers compensation for reviews of websites.   I was getting paid by Blogitive months before PayPerPost.com entered the picture.  

There are currently 9 companies that pay bloggers to write reviews.  Blogitive was the first &quot;get paid to blog&quot; site.  Many WAHMs and SAHMs are grateful for this new income opportunity.  It helps with the loss of an income due to the decision of raising one&#039;s child.  

Unlike the A-listers, we don&#039;t earn six figure incomes, but we can earn enough to pay the utility bills.  In a home with one income, two adults and children....that means a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why Jason Calacanis keeps directing so much animosity towards PayPerPost.  I&#8217;m sure that he&#8217;s aware that BLOGITIVE was the first company to offer average bloggers compensation for reviews of websites.   I was getting paid by Blogitive months before PayPerPost.com entered the picture.  </p>
<p>There are currently 9 companies that pay bloggers to write reviews.  Blogitive was the first &#8220;get paid to blog&#8221; site.  Many WAHMs and SAHMs are grateful for this new income opportunity.  It helps with the loss of an income due to the decision of raising one&#8217;s child.  </p>
<p>Unlike the A-listers, we don&#8217;t earn six figure incomes, but we can earn enough to pay the utility bills.  In a home with one income, two adults and children&#8230;.that means a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/jason-calacanis-speaks-about-digg-netscape-seo-pay-per-post-blogging/4068/comment-page-1/#comment-331013</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 23:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4068#comment-331013</guid>
		<description>@Everett

I think it goes without saying that if you&#039;re blocking the search engines and don&#039;t have machine readable content, you&#039;re not going to get a high rank.

  Do you always expect people to clarify everything with with stupid and obvious exceptions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Everett</p>
<p>I think it goes without saying that if you&#8217;re blocking the search engines and don&#8217;t have machine readable content, you&#8217;re not going to get a high rank.</p>
<p>  Do you always expect people to clarify everything with with stupid and obvious exceptions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/jason-calacanis-speaks-about-digg-netscape-seo-pay-per-post-blogging/4068/comment-page-1/#comment-331000</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 22:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4068#comment-331000</guid>
		<description>IMHO, SEOs make good content easier to find, and are incentivized to do so (of course, I&#039;m not a black hat).  In this regard, its the same as paying Diggers to work for Netscape no?

That said, I think JC is a great linkbaiter/SEO.  He says all this stupid and controversial things that get him noticed in the blogosphere.

I&#039;d just ignore him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO, SEOs make good content easier to find, and are incentivized to do so (of course, I&#8217;m not a black hat).  In this regard, its the same as paying Diggers to work for Netscape no?</p>
<p>That said, I think JC is a great linkbaiter/SEO.  He says all this stupid and controversial things that get him noticed in the blogosphere.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d just ignore him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

