<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Twitter Working a Deal with Google and&#160;Microsoft?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-twitter-working-a-deal-with-google-and-microsoft/13855/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-twitter-working-a-deal-with-google-and-microsoft/13855/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Dunlap</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-twitter-working-a-deal-with-google-and-microsoft/13855/comment-page-1/#comment-1124427</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Dunlap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 01:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13855#comment-1124427</guid>
		<description>They won&#039;t put the stream in search results. It is pointless to get tweets in search results. 

They will use the tweets with links as another variable for Pagerank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They won&#8217;t put the stream in search results. It is pointless to get tweets in search results. </p>
<p>They will use the tweets with links as another variable for Pagerank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-twitter-working-a-deal-with-google-and-microsoft/13855/comment-page-1/#comment-1123656</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 21:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13855#comment-1123656</guid>
		<description>Regardless of who gets the feed, It&#039;ll be interesting to see how well they actually  filter the noise and get to the useful and relevant tweets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of who gets the feed, It&#8217;ll be interesting to see how well they actually  filter the noise and get to the useful and relevant tweets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Mangiafico</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-twitter-working-a-deal-with-google-and-microsoft/13855/comment-page-1/#comment-1123450</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Mangiafico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13855#comment-1123450</guid>
		<description>Unless MS offers something over the top, I think Google will get the nod. If they integrate Twitter similar to image/blog searching in Google, it could be quite useful without cluttering up regular search results.

Rob - LexiConn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless MS offers something over the top, I think Google will get the nod. If they integrate Twitter similar to image/blog searching in Google, it could be quite useful without cluttering up regular search results.</p>
<p>Rob &#8211; LexiConn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BT Automotive</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-twitter-working-a-deal-with-google-and-microsoft/13855/comment-page-1/#comment-1123388</link>
		<dc:creator>BT Automotive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13855#comment-1123388</guid>
		<description>No reason why they shouldn&#039;t be in talks.. Should be interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No reason why they shouldn&#8217;t be in talks.. Should be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

