<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is There Such a Thing as On-Page Trust Factors&#160;(Poll)?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-there-such-a-thing-as-on-page-trust-factors-poll/10696/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-there-such-a-thing-as-on-page-trust-factors-poll/10696/</link>
	<description>Latest Search Engine News from the Search Engine Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:19:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Stoops</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-there-such-a-thing-as-on-page-trust-factors-poll/10696/comment-page-1/#comment-1107891</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Stoops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10696#comment-1107891</guid>
		<description>I agree. Google definitely uses a trust factor as part of their rankings. Like @Nick Stamoulis said, they are just trying to clean up their search results so that they can display only the most relevant and trusted websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Google definitely uses a trust factor as part of their rankings. Like @Nick Stamoulis said, they are just trying to clean up their search results so that they can display only the most relevant and trusted websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tag44</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-there-such-a-thing-as-on-page-trust-factors-poll/10696/comment-page-1/#comment-1101712</link>
		<dc:creator>Tag44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10696#comment-1101712</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post and for sharing the resourceful information with us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post and for sharing the resourceful information with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Game</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-there-such-a-thing-as-on-page-trust-factors-poll/10696/comment-page-1/#comment-1101494</link>
		<dc:creator>Game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10696#comment-1101494</guid>
		<description>This blog has been created to share useful information. Thanks and greetings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog has been created to share useful information. Thanks and greetings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lohith</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-there-such-a-thing-as-on-page-trust-factors-poll/10696/comment-page-1/#comment-1101492</link>
		<dc:creator>Lohith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10696#comment-1101492</guid>
		<description>Yes Google is behind trustworthy websites.I think this post from Ann smarty is sensible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Google is behind trustworthy websites.I think this post from Ann smarty is sensible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vern at AimforAwesome</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-there-such-a-thing-as-on-page-trust-factors-poll/10696/comment-page-1/#comment-1101484</link>
		<dc:creator>Vern at AimforAwesome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10696#comment-1101484</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve thought so since early 2000&#039;s. It makes sense. Having this information is also the sign of a quality site - one that gives a good user experience - so I include it where I can...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve thought so since early 2000&#8217;s. It makes sense. Having this information is also the sign of a quality site &#8211; one that gives a good user experience &#8211; so I include it where I can&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brennan</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-there-such-a-thing-as-on-page-trust-factors-poll/10696/comment-page-1/#comment-1101483</link>
		<dc:creator>Brennan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10696#comment-1101483</guid>
		<description>I think Google is weighing trust now almost as heavily as backlinks. I would say everything you mentioned does matter to Google as they do not want black hat SEO&#039;s finding ways to manipulate the system. I have seen a few clients pages go up in ranking after adding a physical address to the footer as well as a privacy policy and terms of use. It is hard to say whether this was coincidence or not but either way it builds trust with your consumers who visit the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Google is weighing trust now almost as heavily as backlinks. I would say everything you mentioned does matter to Google as they do not want black hat SEO&#8217;s finding ways to manipulate the system. I have seen a few clients pages go up in ranking after adding a physical address to the footer as well as a privacy policy and terms of use. It is hard to say whether this was coincidence or not but either way it builds trust with your consumers who visit the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marjory</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-there-such-a-thing-as-on-page-trust-factors-poll/10696/comment-page-1/#comment-1101482</link>
		<dc:creator>Marjory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10696#comment-1101482</guid>
		<description>How about &quot;I don&#039;t know?&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about &#8220;I don&#8217;t know?&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Bleiweiss</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-there-such-a-thing-as-on-page-trust-factors-poll/10696/comment-page-1/#comment-1101470</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Bleiweiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10696#comment-1101470</guid>
		<description>Ann, there surely is a trust factor on sites.  In addition to the points you&#039;ve suggested, regarding Matt&#039;s reference to internal link quality - if a page is 90% ads, or how about a scraper site / all duplicate content on most of the pages?  

There are countless ways that trust can and most likely is evaluated at the page level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann, there surely is a trust factor on sites.  In addition to the points you&#8217;ve suggested, regarding Matt&#8217;s reference to internal link quality &#8211; if a page is 90% ads, or how about a scraper site / all duplicate content on most of the pages?  </p>
<p>There are countless ways that trust can and most likely is evaluated at the page level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Leonard</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-there-such-a-thing-as-on-page-trust-factors-poll/10696/comment-page-1/#comment-1101462</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Leonard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10696#comment-1101462</guid>
		<description>Interesting post, Ann. Two things  I believe to be trust related page specific factors are the age of the URL (page, not site) and quality of internal links. With that being said, I do believe there are also inherent differences in talking about assumed page trust between large and small sites. I also think trust comes more into play (significantly) with more competitive keywords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, Ann. Two things  I believe to be trust related page specific factors are the age of the URL (page, not site) and quality of internal links. With that being said, I do believe there are also inherent differences in talking about assumed page trust between large and small sites. I also think trust comes more into play (significantly) with more competitive keywords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-there-such-a-thing-as-on-page-trust-factors-poll/10696/comment-page-1/#comment-1101461</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10696#comment-1101461</guid>
		<description>I def. think that Google is starting to strongly lean towards a trust factor type of ranking. This will allow for some of the fly by nights to go away. Google is just trying to clean up search results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I def. think that Google is starting to strongly lean towards a trust factor type of ranking. This will allow for some of the fly by nights to go away. Google is just trying to clean up search results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
