<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is New MSN Search More Precise? Just Ask&#160;Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-new-msn-search-more-precise-just-ask-google/1299/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-new-msn-search-more-precise-just-ask-google/1299/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gothic Poems  - Dark Poetry</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-new-msn-search-more-precise-just-ask-google/1299/comment-page-1/#comment-43145</link>
		<dc:creator>Gothic Poems  - Dark Poetry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=1299#comment-43145</guid>
		<description>For one of my sites it seems that both, yahoo and msn bots hit pages multiple times more than goole. MSN hits about 2x as much, and yahoo 4x as much. Though MSN seems to hit index page more than google or yahoo, so in reality it&#039;s hitting only 1.5x more than google on pages inside site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For one of my sites it seems that both, yahoo and msn bots hit pages multiple times more than goole. MSN hits about 2x as much, and yahoo 4x as much. Though MSN seems to hit index page more than google or yahoo, so in reality it&#8217;s hitting only 1.5x more than google on pages inside site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonescu Razvan</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-new-msn-search-more-precise-just-ask-google/1299/comment-page-1/#comment-43106</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonescu Razvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 20:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=1299#comment-43106</guid>
		<description>The only thing Google has an advantage is its large database and it&#039;s spider activity. While on one of my site googlebot eats up daily around 100+ pages, slurp and msn reduce to 4-7 pages.

And yes dawn is right, Yahoo worths keeping an eye on. From my point of view they seem the quite type that work in background.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing Google has an advantage is its large database and it&#8217;s spider activity. While on one of my site googlebot eats up daily around 100+ pages, slurp and msn reduce to 4-7 pages.</p>
<p>And yes dawn is right, Yahoo worths keeping an eye on. From my point of view they seem the quite type that work in background.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-new-msn-search-more-precise-just-ask-google/1299/comment-page-1/#comment-43102</link>
		<dc:creator>mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 02:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=1299#comment-43102</guid>
		<description>thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dawn</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/is-new-msn-search-more-precise-just-ask-google/1299/comment-page-1/#comment-42876</link>
		<dc:creator>dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2005 20:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=1299#comment-42876</guid>
		<description>i use a lot of the all three search engines for searching music. though msn beta seems to be lacking in many areas for generic cintent it is awesome whereas google now seems to be bringing crappy results. for rare keyword combinations google is always better. One SE to watch is yahoo , they are good at crawling and also index into database faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i use a lot of the all three search engines for searching music. though msn beta seems to be lacking in many areas for generic cintent it is awesome whereas google now seems to be bringing crappy results. for rare keyword combinations google is always better. One SE to watch is yahoo , they are good at crawling and also index into database faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

