<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: .info Domains are Not&#160;Worthless!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:23:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Woodman</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/comment-page-1/#comment-1019783</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Woodman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/#comment-1019783</guid>
		<description>If you have good content why should any of the search engines penalise you for your domain extension...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have good content why should any of the search engines penalise you for your domain extension&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mukesh</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/comment-page-1/#comment-1019405</link>
		<dc:creator>Mukesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 07:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/#comment-1019405</guid>
		<description>They are cheap for the 1st year, but not necessarily so for the 2nd year and so on. So I guess age does count when it comes to .info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are cheap for the 1st year, but not necessarily so for the 2nd year and so on. So I guess age does count when it comes to .info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rooms in Edinburgh</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/comment-page-1/#comment-1018641</link>
		<dc:creator>Rooms in Edinburgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/#comment-1018641</guid>
		<description>Thats good information to have but i will still be sticking to the .com as my main domian use, i mean with Godaddy its only £7 for 2 years which is cheap enough for me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats good information to have but i will still be sticking to the .com as my main domian use, i mean with Godaddy its only £7 for 2 years which is cheap enough for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Egyptian Mau Breeders</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/comment-page-1/#comment-1018081</link>
		<dc:creator>Egyptian Mau Breeders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 01:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/#comment-1018081</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good to know that they are not completley worthless. With all these domain buyers out there demanding high prices for a domain that could be of good use to someone, I am glad that there are other choices for extensions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to know that they are not completley worthless. With all these domain buyers out there demanding high prices for a domain that could be of good use to someone, I am glad that there are other choices for extensions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gie</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/comment-page-1/#comment-1017777</link>
		<dc:creator>gie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/#comment-1017777</guid>
		<description>search for &quot;virtualization&quot; on google, and see who is on top right after wikipedia - virtualization.info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>search for &#8220;virtualization&#8221; on google, and see who is on top right after wikipedia &#8211; virtualization.info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren Baker, Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/comment-page-1/#comment-1017097</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Baker, Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 23:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/#comment-1017097</guid>
		<description>Hey FavBrowser, like I said, some long time highly respected professional SEO&#039;s were discussing this and a large percentage of the SEO industry (including the directors of SEO at some major companies) are more or less newbies :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey FavBrowser, like I said, some long time highly respected professional SEO&#8217;s were discussing this and a large percentage of the SEO industry (including the directors of SEO at some major companies) are more or less newbies :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Favorite Browser</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/comment-page-1/#comment-1017095</link>
		<dc:creator>Favorite Browser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 23:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/#comment-1017095</guid>
		<description>Um... OK... Everyone knew that (expect newbies)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230; OK&#8230; Everyone knew that (expect newbies)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren Baker, Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/comment-page-1/#comment-1017091</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Baker, Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 23:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/#comment-1017091</guid>
		<description>Excellent example Joost, and thanks for the living case study :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent example Joost, and thanks for the living case study :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joost de Valk</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/comment-page-1/#comment-1017077</link>
		<dc:creator>Joost de Valk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 22:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/#comment-1017077</guid>
		<description>Agreed Loren, I own and operate css3.info, which outranks the w3 for css3, which is their own standard...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed Loren, I own and operate css3.info, which outranks the w3 for css3, which is their own standard&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Design Kris</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/comment-page-1/#comment-1016659</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Design Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 12:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/info-domains-are-not-worthless/6574/#comment-1016659</guid>
		<description>I think if registrars would raise prices on .INFO`s they would take care of the spamming issue associated with the TLD . That would improve the popularity of the .INFO name .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if registrars would raise prices on .INFO`s they would take care of the spamming issue associated with the TLD . That would improve the popularity of the .INFO name .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

