<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Analyze the Internal Power of Your&#160;Website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:21:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Automotive Social Network</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/comment-page-1/#comment-1077837</link>
		<dc:creator>Automotive Social Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 01:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/#comment-1077837</guid>
		<description>Very nicely written. Well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nicely written. Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/comment-page-1/#comment-1023497</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/#comment-1023497</guid>
		<description>Ann,

You really are a smarty.

Well Done</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann,</p>
<p>You really are a smarty.</p>
<p>Well Done</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Smarty</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/comment-page-1/#comment-1022794</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Smarty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/#comment-1022794</guid>
		<description>@Clicksharp Marketing: the link is working just fine actually, I just checked. 

Backlinkwatch.com checks backlinks only for one page at a time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Clicksharp Marketing: the link is working just fine actually, I just checked. </p>
<p>Backlinkwatch.com checks backlinks only for one page at a time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clicksharp Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/comment-page-1/#comment-1022460</link>
		<dc:creator>Clicksharp Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/#comment-1022460</guid>
		<description>Seems like lots of people are having trouble with the Blogstorm link.  You might consider http:/www.backlinkwatch.com as an alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like lots of people are having trouble with the Blogstorm link.  You might consider http:/www.backlinkwatch.com as an alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mercy</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/comment-page-1/#comment-1020415</link>
		<dc:creator>Mercy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 05:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/#comment-1020415</guid>
		<description>SEOQuake seems not to be promising just with the usual indexing, no of links, age, source etc... Blog strom looks fine, but at the same time, we can not determine that every competitor would have the xml sitemap as sitemap.xml. (I mean the file name would be any, we cannot determine that)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEOQuake seems not to be promising just with the usual indexing, no of links, age, source etc&#8230; Blog strom looks fine, but at the same time, we can not determine that every competitor would have the xml sitemap as sitemap.xml. (I mean the file name would be any, we cannot determine that)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaan Kanellis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/comment-page-1/#comment-1019897</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaan Kanellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/#comment-1019897</guid>
		<description>Interesting post Ann.  I just wondering, do you believe in PR Sculpting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post Ann.  I just wondering, do you believe in PR Sculpting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malte Landwehr</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/comment-page-1/#comment-1019782</link>
		<dc:creator>Malte Landwehr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/#comment-1019782</guid>
		<description>1. active SEO Quake plugin
2. make sure its activated for yahoo sitexplorer and google
3. make a site:example.com search (with as many results per page as possible [=100])
4. sort results by yahoo links (not domain links!)
Takes just a couple of seconds and give you a rough list of the pages that have most external linkjuice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. active SEO Quake plugin<br />
2. make sure its activated for yahoo sitexplorer and google<br />
3. make a site:example.com search (with as many results per page as possible [=100])<br />
4. sort results by yahoo links (not domain links!)<br />
Takes just a couple of seconds and give you a rough list of the pages that have most external linkjuice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey L. Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/comment-page-1/#comment-1019730</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey L. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/#comment-1019730</guid>
		<description>The methods you propose are solid. I am a fan of SEO quake as well, very useful tool indeed. It collects relevant data such as domain age, number of backlinks, allows you to reverse engineer the Google Algorithm (to some degree) with SEO Digger and the tools are excellent indicators of how healthy a site is and why it performs the way it does.

Hats off Annie on another great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The methods you propose are solid. I am a fan of SEO quake as well, very useful tool indeed. It collects relevant data such as domain age, number of backlinks, allows you to reverse engineer the Google Algorithm (to some degree) with SEO Digger and the tools are excellent indicators of how healthy a site is and why it performs the way it does.</p>
<p>Hats off Annie on another great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Longley</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/comment-page-1/#comment-1019705</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Longley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/#comment-1019705</guid>
		<description>Hi Ann,
Some how your headlines always suck me in... Recently while doing some site evaluations I came across this tool. http://www.axandra.com/ibp-store.htm
It cost around $500 for the business edition but I have found that it is well worth it. It gives a very nice summary  of changes that you should make per page and a 70 page report on a particular page that you analyze.  Although I am a penny pincher and usually prefer to do things the free (usually more time consuming) way, this is a tool that is worth investing in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ann,<br />
Some how your headlines always suck me in&#8230; Recently while doing some site evaluations I came across this tool. <a href="http://www.axandra.com/ibp-store.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.axandra.com/ibp-store.htm</a><br />
It cost around $500 for the business edition but I have found that it is well worth it. It gives a very nice summary  of changes that you should make per page and a 70 page report on a particular page that you analyze.  Although I am a penny pincher and usually prefer to do things the free (usually more time consuming) way, this is a tool that is worth investing in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Schipul</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/comment-page-1/#comment-1019682</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Schipul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-analyze-the-internal-power-of-your-website/6563/#comment-1019682</guid>
		<description>In your opinion, does &quot;/default.htm&quot; versus &quot;/&quot; as the root reference affect the internal page power?

Or to  put it another way, if the &quot;services&quot; link on your nav is set to &quot;/services/default.htm&quot; is this a bad thing that might divide internal rank between the file name and the default document even if they are the same?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your opinion, does &#8220;/default.htm&#8221; versus &#8220;/&#8221; as the root reference affect the internal page power?</p>
<p>Or to  put it another way, if the &#8220;services&#8221; link on your nav is set to &#8220;/services/default.htm&#8221; is this a bad thing that might divide internal rank between the file name and the default document even if they are the same?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

