<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Google Might Differentiate Between Trust and&#160;Authority</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-google-might-differentiate-between-trust-and-authority/7794/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-google-might-differentiate-between-trust-and-authority/7794/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Mumbai</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-google-might-differentiate-between-trust-and-authority/7794/comment-page-1/#comment-1086501</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Mumbai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 08:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-google-might-differentiate-between-trust-and-authority/7794/#comment-1086501</guid>
		<description>Ann your post was very useful to as to I got to know the difference between trust and authority, but I thing trust might be playing more important role in SE&#039;s algorithm than only Protecting our websites from &quot;Google-bowling&quot; campaign against our domain. You  should have written your post with more detail so that newbies in SEO field could understand that trust is more important than pagerank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann your post was very useful to as to I got to know the difference between trust and authority, but I thing trust might be playing more important role in SE&#8217;s algorithm than only Protecting our websites from &#8220;Google-bowling&#8221; campaign against our domain. You  should have written your post with more detail so that newbies in SEO field could understand that trust is more important than pagerank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-google-might-differentiate-between-trust-and-authority/7794/comment-page-1/#comment-1086464</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 14:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-google-might-differentiate-between-trust-and-authority/7794/#comment-1086464</guid>
		<description>Ann:

Well spoken, building trust and authority is so important vs. just building links.

I feel like a broken record often echoed in our blog talking about authority (typically referred to as a nebulous or indistinct metric). 

What would have taken pages to explain, you summarize perfectly with a simple diagram and three criteria/metrics (now that is optimization for you). Tedster does some mean research...

Rand, by the way, love what you have done with your new tool Linkscape (hat tip) :) you should be proud for taking such a bold vertical step in how SEO&#039;s research websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann:</p>
<p>Well spoken, building trust and authority is so important vs. just building links.</p>
<p>I feel like a broken record often echoed in our blog talking about authority (typically referred to as a nebulous or indistinct metric). </p>
<p>What would have taken pages to explain, you summarize perfectly with a simple diagram and three criteria/metrics (now that is optimization for you). Tedster does some mean research&#8230;</p>
<p>Rand, by the way, love what you have done with your new tool Linkscape (hat tip) :) you should be proud for taking such a bold vertical step in how SEO&#8217;s research websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prestamos Personales</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-google-might-differentiate-between-trust-and-authority/7794/comment-page-1/#comment-1086441</link>
		<dc:creator>Prestamos Personales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-google-might-differentiate-between-trust-and-authority/7794/#comment-1086441</guid>
		<description>great idea, so what you have to do is to have trusted pages on an aothority domain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great idea, so what you have to do is to have trusted pages on an aothority domain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-google-might-differentiate-between-trust-and-authority/7794/comment-page-1/#comment-1086415</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-google-might-differentiate-between-trust-and-authority/7794/#comment-1086415</guid>
		<description>Great idea.. it does make sense!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea.. it does make sense!  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randfish</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-google-might-differentiate-between-trust-and-authority/7794/comment-page-1/#comment-1086379</link>
		<dc:creator>randfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-google-might-differentiate-between-trust-and-authority/7794/#comment-1086379</guid>
		<description>Really good stuff, Ann (as always). When we built our trust-based algorithm on the Linkscape index, we found that it had a terrific predictive ability to differentiate high quality sites from low. Running a pure link popularity/importance algo like WebRank/PageRank/StaticRank/etc. would show a number of manipulative and spammy sites in the top echelons, but biasing through trusted sites using the principles of TrustRank was very revealing.

When we dive in, we&#039;re looking at pretty much every domain under mozTrust (mT) 3 having some issues and everything over mT 6 being really solid. It&#039;s not perfect by any means, but I think there&#039;s great evidence from the data to suggest that engines would be crazy not to use it in at least some capacities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really good stuff, Ann (as always). When we built our trust-based algorithm on the Linkscape index, we found that it had a terrific predictive ability to differentiate high quality sites from low. Running a pure link popularity/importance algo like WebRank/PageRank/StaticRank/etc. would show a number of manipulative and spammy sites in the top echelons, but biasing through trusted sites using the principles of TrustRank was very revealing.</p>
<p>When we dive in, we&#8217;re looking at pretty much every domain under mozTrust (mT) 3 having some issues and everything over mT 6 being really solid. It&#8217;s not perfect by any means, but I think there&#8217;s great evidence from the data to suggest that engines would be crazy not to use it in at least some capacities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

