<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Define: Operator Works and How To Get Included in Google&#160;Definitions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-define-operator-works-and-how-to-get-included-in-google-definitions/7821/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-define-operator-works-and-how-to-get-included-in-google-definitions/7821/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:21:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Briongloid Media</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-define-operator-works-and-how-to-get-included-in-google-definitions/7821/comment-page-1/#comment-1104082</link>
		<dc:creator>Briongloid Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-define-operator-works-and-how-to-get-included-in-google-definitions/7821/#comment-1104082</guid>
		<description>Hi Ann, 
Thanks for this post, exactly the information I was looking for - have bookmarked for future reference and will now test these techniques out on my own website - wish me luck! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ann,<br />
Thanks for this post, exactly the information I was looking for &#8211; have bookmarked for future reference and will now test these techniques out on my own website &#8211; wish me luck! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: websites</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-define-operator-works-and-how-to-get-included-in-google-definitions/7821/comment-page-1/#comment-1092706</link>
		<dc:creator>websites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-define-operator-works-and-how-to-get-included-in-google-definitions/7821/#comment-1092706</guid>
		<description>Everything is changing come 2009 as Google has a new set of algorithms thats gonna change the way search results are displayed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything is changing come 2009 as Google has a new set of algorithms thats gonna change the way search results are displayed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suresh</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-define-operator-works-and-how-to-get-included-in-google-definitions/7821/comment-page-1/#comment-1088611</link>
		<dc:creator>suresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-define-operator-works-and-how-to-get-included-in-google-definitions/7821/#comment-1088611</guid>
		<description>Hi frd,

        i think you learn more for seo. i am now start friend. if any material you got it pls share it friend. your tips are more useful for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi frd,</p>
<p>        i think you learn more for seo. i am now start friend. if any material you got it pls share it friend. your tips are more useful for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Mumbai</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-define-operator-works-and-how-to-get-included-in-google-definitions/7821/comment-page-1/#comment-1086701</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Mumbai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-define-operator-works-and-how-to-get-included-in-google-definitions/7821/#comment-1086701</guid>
		<description>I think we should research for the terms for which google  can&#039;t provide any answer if we search with define operative. And then write unique researched description of than terms. Getting some quality link backs for that glossary page will also help a lot☺</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we should research for the terms for which google  can&#8217;t provide any answer if we search with define operative. And then write unique researched description of than terms. Getting some quality link backs for that glossary page will also help a lot☺</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infoaddicts</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-define-operator-works-and-how-to-get-included-in-google-definitions/7821/comment-page-1/#comment-1086696</link>
		<dc:creator>infoaddicts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-define-operator-works-and-how-to-get-included-in-google-definitions/7821/#comment-1086696</guid>
		<description>Hi Ann,
I often use the define operator to find the meaning of words, its pretty quick and accurate.
Thanks for the advanced tips, will give them a try.
Regards.
Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ann,<br />
I often use the define operator to find the meaning of words, its pretty quick and accurate.<br />
Thanks for the advanced tips, will give them a try.<br />
Regards.<br />
Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Du Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-define-operator-works-and-how-to-get-included-in-google-definitions/7821/comment-page-1/#comment-1086688</link>
		<dc:creator>Du Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-define-operator-works-and-how-to-get-included-in-google-definitions/7821/#comment-1086688</guid>
		<description>Sounds interesting. I&#039;ll follow these tips!
Thanks for sharing! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds interesting. I&#8217;ll follow these tips!<br />
Thanks for sharing! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-define-operator-works-and-how-to-get-included-in-google-definitions/7821/comment-page-1/#comment-1086661</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-define-operator-works-and-how-to-get-included-in-google-definitions/7821/#comment-1086661</guid>
		<description>Perhaps one of the easier things to do is use the HTML  and  tags for &quot;terms&quot; and &quot;definitions&quot;, respectively. I&#039;ve done this on my SEM glossary and get a steady stream of traffic to a VERY boring page. There are traffic spikes occasionally and I think it&#039;s due to algorithm testing for the &quot;define:&quot; operator.

I&#039;ve been meaning to clean up the glossary and add some more info, but it&#039;s low on the priority list at the moment. I should also point out that this traffic bounces at nearly 100%. I assume this is primarily because people are focused on getting a quick definition. 

Also, my definitions are unique (or were) and I have since seen them showing up in other glossaries. Damn you, content pirates!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps one of the easier things to do is use the HTML  and  tags for &#8220;terms&#8221; and &#8220;definitions&#8221;, respectively. I&#8217;ve done this on my SEM glossary and get a steady stream of traffic to a VERY boring page. There are traffic spikes occasionally and I think it&#8217;s due to algorithm testing for the &#8220;define:&#8221; operator.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to clean up the glossary and add some more info, but it&#8217;s low on the priority list at the moment. I should also point out that this traffic bounces at nearly 100%. I assume this is primarily because people are focused on getting a quick definition. </p>
<p>Also, my definitions are unique (or were) and I have since seen them showing up in other glossaries. Damn you, content pirates!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

