<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Product Search Catches Up with&#160;Rivals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/googles-product-search-catches-up-with-rivals/8222/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/googles-product-search-catches-up-with-rivals/8222/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anyup</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/googles-product-search-catches-up-with-rivals/8222/comment-page-1/#comment-1091394</link>
		<dc:creator>anyup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/googles-product-search-catches-up-with-rivals/8222/#comment-1091394</guid>
		<description>You are right, I think so  .
google is a nice tools</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right, I think so  .<br />
google is a nice tools</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jojo</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/googles-product-search-catches-up-with-rivals/8222/comment-page-1/#comment-1091329</link>
		<dc:creator>jojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/googles-product-search-catches-up-with-rivals/8222/#comment-1091329</guid>
		<description>First of all, it&#039;s &#039;fortunate&#039; and good that Google Product Search is catching up.  I myself always thought Google was superior in this area and moreso with the changes they have made. Second of all, Google Product Search use to be called Froogle, not Froggle.  It  sounds like &#039;frugal&#039; and rhymes with Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, it&#8217;s &#8216;fortunate&#8217; and good that Google Product Search is catching up.  I myself always thought Google was superior in this area and moreso with the changes they have made. Second of all, Google Product Search use to be called Froogle, not Froggle.  It  sounds like &#8216;frugal&#8217; and rhymes with Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

