<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google &amp; Yahoo Ranking Look at Domains Rather Than Individual&#160;Pages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-yahoo-ranking-look-at-domains-rather-than-individual-pages/4625/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-yahoo-ranking-look-at-domains-rather-than-individual-pages/4625/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:21:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-yahoo-ranking-look-at-domains-rather-than-individual-pages/4625/comment-page-1/#comment-436887</link>
		<dc:creator>John Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 05:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-yahoo-ranking-look-at-domains-rather-than-individual-pages/4625/#comment-436887</guid>
		<description>Domain based (as opposed to page based) algorithms are not news. Not new news at least.

To quote myself, 

&lt;blockquote&gt;A single web page on a domain ranking without any external links. The conveniently overlooked factor is that the domain itself has hundreds or thousands of inbound links, and those links are the foundation of the rankings. Put the same web page on another domain without the links, and it will lose all ranking.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

http://www.internet-marketing-blog.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/

Neither SERoundtable or V7N quoted me. Boo hoo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Domain based (as opposed to page based) algorithms are not news. Not new news at least.</p>
<p>To quote myself, </p>
<blockquote><p>A single web page on a domain ranking without any external links. The conveniently overlooked factor is that the domain itself has hundreds or thousands of inbound links, and those links are the foundation of the rankings. Put the same web page on another domain without the links, and it will lose all ranking.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.internet-marketing-blog.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/" rel="nofollow">http://www.internet-marketing-blog.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/</a></p>
<p>Neither SERoundtable or V7N quoted me. Boo hoo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-yahoo-ranking-look-at-domains-rather-than-individual-pages/4625/comment-page-1/#comment-435976</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 23:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-yahoo-ranking-look-at-domains-rather-than-individual-pages/4625/#comment-435976</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t recall seeing the Digital Point thread or the SER post. 

I think it&#039;s fair to say a lot of people are speculating along these lines because more examples of domain-related authority appear to be cropping up in their day to day SEM work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t recall seeing the Digital Point thread or the SER post. </p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s fair to say a lot of people are speculating along these lines because more examples of domain-related authority appear to be cropping up in their day to day SEM work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-yahoo-ranking-look-at-domains-rather-than-individual-pages/4625/comment-page-1/#comment-434512</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-yahoo-ranking-look-at-domains-rather-than-individual-pages/4625/#comment-434512</guid>
		<description>Wonder why Peter did cite http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/012898.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder why Peter did cite <a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/012898.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/012898.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-yahoo-ranking-look-at-domains-rather-than-individual-pages/4625/comment-page-1/#comment-434492</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-yahoo-ranking-look-at-domains-rather-than-individual-pages/4625/#comment-434492</guid>
		<description>Interesting find. Just a bit &lt;b&gt;OFF Topic&lt;/b&gt; here but I sent you an email a few days ago Loren to no reply. Can you confirm you received it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting find. Just a bit <b>OFF Topic</b> here but I sent you an email a few days ago Loren to no reply. Can you confirm you received it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

