<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Wants to Index and Organize Web&#160;Images</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-wants-to-index-and-organize-web-images/7232/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-wants-to-index-and-organize-web-images/7232/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamp Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-wants-to-index-and-organize-web-images/7232/comment-page-1/#comment-1093497</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamp Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-wants-to-index-and-organize-web-images/7232/#comment-1093497</guid>
		<description>Do you guys know how google indexes images? I know that they take alt, title and surrounding texts but I guess there&#039;s something more.
also for this new image processing, how would google know who&#039;s the real owner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you guys know how google indexes images? I know that they take alt, title and surrounding texts but I guess there&#8217;s something more.<br />
also for this new image processing, how would google know who&#8217;s the real owner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-wants-to-index-and-organize-web-images/7232/comment-page-1/#comment-1081938</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-wants-to-index-and-organize-web-images/7232/#comment-1081938</guid>
		<description>The direction with GeoTagging will be interesting to follow in the coming months as cameras in the near future will have GPS embedded in cameras and tagged in the meta of photos that are taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The direction with GeoTagging will be interesting to follow in the coming months as cameras in the near future will have GPS embedded in cameras and tagged in the meta of photos that are taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sushubh</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-wants-to-index-and-organize-web-images/7232/comment-page-1/#comment-1081928</link>
		<dc:creator>Sushubh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-wants-to-index-and-organize-web-images/7232/#comment-1081928</guid>
		<description>http://www.tineye.com/ is a potential acquisition target. their technology is pretty cool and it works!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.tineye.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tineye.com/</a> is a potential acquisition target. their technology is pretty cool and it works!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SharkGirl</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-wants-to-index-and-organize-web-images/7232/comment-page-1/#comment-1081927</link>
		<dc:creator>SharkGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-wants-to-index-and-organize-web-images/7232/#comment-1081927</guid>
		<description>Is this something that be of benefit to us, the owners of our images?   I&#039;m wondering if I need to put watermarks on all my images, because I don&#039;t like the idea of Google (or others) doing whatever it is they&#039;re going to be doing with our images.

Making money on them?  Do we get royalties?  Isn&#039;t that theft?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this something that be of benefit to us, the owners of our images?   I&#8217;m wondering if I need to put watermarks on all my images, because I don&#8217;t like the idea of Google (or others) doing whatever it is they&#8217;re going to be doing with our images.</p>
<p>Making money on them?  Do we get royalties?  Isn&#8217;t that theft?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-wants-to-index-and-organize-web-images/7232/comment-page-1/#comment-1081926</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-wants-to-index-and-organize-web-images/7232/#comment-1081926</guid>
		<description>So how can proactive webmasters ready their images for this? 

I remember reading a post by Chris Pearson (of http://www.pearsonified.com ) referring to alt text, title text and surrounding body copy, but with this new technology, is that enough?

Or should we just hope that our images are &quot;found?&quot; Are there budding search engines to submit image laden pages to now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how can proactive webmasters ready their images for this? </p>
<p>I remember reading a post by Chris Pearson (of <a href="http://www.pearsonified.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.pearsonified.com</a> ) referring to alt text, title text and surrounding body copy, but with this new technology, is that enough?</p>
<p>Or should we just hope that our images are &#8220;found?&#8221; Are there budding search engines to submit image laden pages to now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

