<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Tops Nielsen&#8217;s July Search Share&#160;Rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-tops-nielsens-july-search-share-rankings/7550/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-tops-nielsens-july-search-share-rankings/7550/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-tops-nielsens-july-search-share-rankings/7550/comment-page-1/#comment-1084336</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-tops-nielsens-july-search-share-rankings/7550/#comment-1084336</guid>
		<description>In any case, 30, 40% is a huge chunk of the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In any case, 30, 40% is a huge chunk of the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dax brady sheehan</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-tops-nielsens-july-search-share-rankings/7550/comment-page-1/#comment-1084332</link>
		<dc:creator>dax brady sheehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-tops-nielsens-july-search-share-rankings/7550/#comment-1084332</guid>
		<description>@Michael I&#039;d be interested in some data backing up those wild claims. Let&#039;s see it, because what your saying is that G&#039;s market share is 50% less then everywhere else is reporting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael I&#8217;d be interested in some data backing up those wild claims. Let&#8217;s see it, because what your saying is that G&#8217;s market share is 50% less then everywhere else is reporting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-tops-nielsens-july-search-share-rankings/7550/comment-page-1/#comment-1084293</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-tops-nielsens-july-search-share-rankings/7550/#comment-1084293</guid>
		<description>These search market share reports are nonsense.   They don&#039;t take into consideration the fact that a lot of people run ranking reports against Google&#039;s search results far more often than against other search engines&#039; results.

Based on estimated actual visitors and visits per month, Google&#039;s real market share is still under 40%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These search market share reports are nonsense.   They don&#8217;t take into consideration the fact that a lot of people run ranking reports against Google&#8217;s search results far more often than against other search engines&#8217; results.</p>
<p>Based on estimated actual visitors and visits per month, Google&#8217;s real market share is still under 40%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seo</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-tops-nielsens-july-search-share-rankings/7550/comment-page-1/#comment-1084275</link>
		<dc:creator>seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-tops-nielsens-july-search-share-rankings/7550/#comment-1084275</guid>
		<description>Google proves to be the best in the search engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google proves to be the best in the search engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

