<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Text Link Ads vs. Text Link&#160;Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-text-link-ads-vs-text-link-ads/4565/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-text-link-ads-vs-text-link-ads/4565/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina George</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-text-link-ads-vs-text-link-ads/4565/comment-page-1/#comment-1143395</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-text-link-ads-vs-text-link-ads/4565/#comment-1143395</guid>
		<description>Hi Loren,firstly, thanks for your article.
Can you please tell , keeping these ads is harmful for publishers also,and is it compatible with adsense ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Loren,firstly, thanks for your article.<br />
Can you please tell , keeping these ads is harmful for publishers also,and is it compatible with adsense ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Affordable Insurance</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-text-link-ads-vs-text-link-ads/4565/comment-page-1/#comment-848883</link>
		<dc:creator>Affordable Insurance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 23:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-text-link-ads-vs-text-link-ads/4565/#comment-848883</guid>
		<description>If Google continues using this term, I would think that Text Link Ads would have a very strong case for branding infringement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Google continues using this term, I would think that Text Link Ads would have a very strong case for branding infringement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie Walter</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-text-link-ads-vs-text-link-ads/4565/comment-page-1/#comment-427571</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-text-link-ads-vs-text-link-ads/4565/#comment-427571</guid>
		<description>Hey Loren,

Good post.  It kind of mirrors the thoughts I expressed in a comment to Barry&#039;s post and also the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eddiewalter.com/blog/index.php/google-selling-text-link-ads/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Google Selling Text Link Ads?&quot;&lt;/a&gt; post I placed on my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Loren,</p>
<p>Good post.  It kind of mirrors the thoughts I expressed in a comment to Barry&#8217;s post and also the <a href="http://www.eddiewalter.com/blog/index.php/google-selling-text-link-ads/" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Google Selling Text Link Ads?&#8221;</a> post I placed on my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

