<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Sponsored Ads Get Closer to Organic Results in&#160;SERPs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-sponsored-ads-get-closer-to-organic-results-in-serps/12354/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-sponsored-ads-get-closer-to-organic-results-in-serps/12354/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:21:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Choi</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-sponsored-ads-get-closer-to-organic-results-in-serps/12354/comment-page-1/#comment-1109596</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Choi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=12354#comment-1109596</guid>
		<description>I have noticed this change browsing from within China as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have noticed this change browsing from within China as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voodish</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-sponsored-ads-get-closer-to-organic-results-in-serps/12354/comment-page-1/#comment-1108460</link>
		<dc:creator>Voodish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=12354#comment-1108460</guid>
		<description>Definitely, with more and more people using larger resolutions, the sidebar sponsored links were getting further and further away from the organic Links; I bet this slight change, will bring in a massive amount more revenue for Big G.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely, with more and more people using larger resolutions, the sidebar sponsored links were getting further and further away from the organic Links; I bet this slight change, will bring in a massive amount more revenue for Big G.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean vernall</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-sponsored-ads-get-closer-to-organic-results-in-serps/12354/comment-page-1/#comment-1108281</link>
		<dc:creator>sean vernall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=12354#comment-1108281</guid>
		<description>I wonder if this is Google&#039;s attempt at a gradual move towards a three column format.  Notice how the PPC links take up half of the sponsored link area width.  If Google were attempting to fool users into clicking on PPC links then a better tactic would be to make them look more like the organic links - namely spreading them across the available area.

I would say keep watching the white space on competitive terms, I bet it wont be long before we start seeing PPC links appearing there.   This is certainly something I would do to increase revenue in a world where resolution dimensions are getting larger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if this is Google&#8217;s attempt at a gradual move towards a three column format.  Notice how the PPC links take up half of the sponsored link area width.  If Google were attempting to fool users into clicking on PPC links then a better tactic would be to make them look more like the organic links &#8211; namely spreading them across the available area.</p>
<p>I would say keep watching the white space on competitive terms, I bet it wont be long before we start seeing PPC links appearing there.   This is certainly something I would do to increase revenue in a world where resolution dimensions are getting larger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hazar</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-sponsored-ads-get-closer-to-organic-results-in-serps/12354/comment-page-1/#comment-1108231</link>
		<dc:creator>Hazar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=12354#comment-1108231</guid>
		<description>Exactly right! A good strategy from Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly right! A good strategy from Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Che</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-sponsored-ads-get-closer-to-organic-results-in-serps/12354/comment-page-1/#comment-1107501</link>
		<dc:creator>Che</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 05:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=12354#comment-1107501</guid>
		<description>C&#039;mon guys,  Google is not a charity !

PPC is how they make their money and a tiny tweak to maybe increase the number of clicks they get which eran them revenue is simply good business !

If they get a user revolt they will fold to pressure but as long as they keep doing things that are genrally useful no one will mind to much . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon guys,  Google is not a charity !</p>
<p>PPC is how they make their money and a tiny tweak to maybe increase the number of clicks they get which eran them revenue is simply good business !</p>
<p>If they get a user revolt they will fold to pressure but as long as they keep doing things that are genrally useful no one will mind to much . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Che</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-sponsored-ads-get-closer-to-organic-results-in-serps/12354/comment-page-1/#comment-1107500</link>
		<dc:creator>Che</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 05:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=12354#comment-1107500</guid>
		<description>The left top and the right hand column are all the same thing...   top left are positions 1-3 and the right is 4,5,6 etc...

getting your ad in the top left however will require a higher cost per click or &#039;bid&#039; amount...

A good qulaity score is the next part of the equation to help you appear in this section...

good luck !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The left top and the right hand column are all the same thing&#8230;   top left are positions 1-3 and the right is 4,5,6 etc&#8230;</p>
<p>getting your ad in the top left however will require a higher cost per click or &#8216;bid&#8217; amount&#8230;</p>
<p>A good qulaity score is the next part of the equation to help you appear in this section&#8230;</p>
<p>good luck !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Pickard</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-sponsored-ads-get-closer-to-organic-results-in-serps/12354/comment-page-1/#comment-1107387</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Pickard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 18:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=12354#comment-1107387</guid>
		<description>It certainly would not surprise me if Google is attempting to increase the click-thru rate for ads on the right hand side of the SERP&#039;s. More ad clicks results in greater revenue. 

An eye tracking study we conducted at User Centic indicated that Bing&#039;s three column format resulted in sponsored links on the right attracted more attention on Bing (~42% of participants per search) than they did on Google (~25% of participants per search). If Google moves the sponsored ads closer to the organic results, an increase in clicks seems to be a likely result. As a side note, we had at least 68 views of the eye tracking study article from visitors originating in Mountain View, CA using the Google.com domain shortly after it was published on our website. The User Centric study can be viewed at http://www.usercentric.com/news/2009/06/08/eye-tracking-bing-vs-google-first-look</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It certainly would not surprise me if Google is attempting to increase the click-thru rate for ads on the right hand side of the SERP&#8217;s. More ad clicks results in greater revenue. </p>
<p>An eye tracking study we conducted at User Centic indicated that Bing&#8217;s three column format resulted in sponsored links on the right attracted more attention on Bing (~42% of participants per search) than they did on Google (~25% of participants per search). If Google moves the sponsored ads closer to the organic results, an increase in clicks seems to be a likely result. As a side note, we had at least 68 views of the eye tracking study article from visitors originating in Mountain View, CA using the Google.com domain shortly after it was published on our website. The User Centric study can be viewed at <a href="http://www.usercentric.com/news/2009/06/08/eye-tracking-bing-vs-google-first-look" rel="nofollow">http://www.usercentric.com/news/2009/06/08/eye-tracking-bing-vs-google-first-look</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilly</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-sponsored-ads-get-closer-to-organic-results-in-serps/12354/comment-page-1/#comment-1107381</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=12354#comment-1107381</guid>
		<description>those ads look like shit to me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>those ads look like shit to me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Welford</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-sponsored-ads-get-closer-to-organic-results-in-serps/12354/comment-page-1/#comment-1107380</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Welford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=12354#comment-1107380</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it&#039;s not surprising that we need to scrutinize Google&#039;s every move to see how it is favoring ad content on the screen.  This not only brings the right column ads more &#039;in your face&#039; but also narrows the main left column, thus pushing organic results lower and giving more vertical space to the sponsored results in that column.

This has nothing to do with user experience, although as others have noted, most users won&#039;t think about this.  It has everything to do with advertising display.  Oh well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s not surprising that we need to scrutinize Google&#8217;s every move to see how it is favoring ad content on the screen.  This not only brings the right column ads more &#8216;in your face&#8217; but also narrows the main left column, thus pushing organic results lower and giving more vertical space to the sponsored results in that column.</p>
<p>This has nothing to do with user experience, although as others have noted, most users won&#8217;t think about this.  It has everything to do with advertising display.  Oh well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bartjan</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-sponsored-ads-get-closer-to-organic-results-in-serps/12354/comment-page-1/#comment-1107365</link>
		<dc:creator>Bartjan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=12354#comment-1107365</guid>
		<description>I noticed this aswell this week, since I use 1920x1200 (widescreen) you notice it quite easy.
I just thought it was probably an FF addon which wasn&#039;t working as it should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed this aswell this week, since I use 1920&#215;1200 (widescreen) you notice it quite easy.<br />
I just thought it was probably an FF addon which wasn&#8217;t working as it should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

