<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Says Spamming Other Sites Can Lower Site&#160;Ranking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-says-spamming-other-sites-can-lower-site-ranking/14996/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-says-spamming-other-sites-can-lower-site-ranking/14996/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:21:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Expert Arpit Kothari</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-says-spamming-other-sites-can-lower-site-ranking/14996/comment-page-1/#comment-1166904</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Expert Arpit Kothari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=14996#comment-1166904</guid>
		<description>Yes, you are right:

    * Disallow anonymous posting.
    * Use CAPTCHAs and other methods to prevent automated comment spamming.
    * Turn on comment moderation.
    * Use the &quot;nofollow&quot; attribute for links in the comment field.
    * Disallow hyperlinks in comments.
    * Block comment pages using robots.txt or meta tags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you are right:</p>
<p>    * Disallow anonymous posting.<br />
    * Use CAPTCHAs and other methods to prevent automated comment spamming.<br />
    * Turn on comment moderation.<br />
    * Use the &#8220;nofollow&#8221; attribute for links in the comment field.<br />
    * Disallow hyperlinks in comments.<br />
    * Block comment pages using robots.txt or meta tags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John S. Britsios</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-says-spamming-other-sites-can-lower-site-ranking/14996/comment-page-1/#comment-1156573</link>
		<dc:creator>John S. Britsios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=14996#comment-1156573</guid>
		<description>Syed, I did not say that Google does not support the nofollow attribute for external sites links. I was talking about using nofollow for site internal links.

I went a bit further with my research and I found out that it works for internal pages, but not as it used to: http://searchenginewatch.com/3634387

And I moderate the comments in my blog too, but I also the spammers a favor before they attempt to add comments.

Check any article on my blog searcheditors.com to see what I mean. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Syed, I did not say that Google does not support the nofollow attribute for external sites links. I was talking about using nofollow for site internal links.</p>
<p>I went a bit further with my research and I found out that it works for internal pages, but not as it used to: <a href="http://searchenginewatch.com/3634387" rel="nofollow">http://searchenginewatch.com/3634387</a></p>
<p>And I moderate the comments in my blog too, but I also the spammers a favor before they attempt to add comments.</p>
<p>Check any article on my blog searcheditors.com to see what I mean. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John S. Britsios</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-says-spamming-other-sites-can-lower-site-ranking/14996/comment-page-1/#comment-1153454</link>
		<dc:creator>John S. Britsios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=14996#comment-1153454</guid>
		<description>@carlo/Carlo if you read the blog post of Google they said:
&quot;Others might tweak this approach a bit by posting a generic comment (like &quot;Nice site!&quot;) with a commercial user name linking to their site.&quot;

Did you notice that your post here is exactly what Google is after?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@carlo/Carlo if you read the blog post of Google they said:<br />
&#8220;Others might tweak this approach a bit by posting a generic comment (like &#8220;Nice site!&#8221;) with a commercial user name linking to their site.&#8221;</p>
<p>Did you notice that your post here is exactly what Google is after?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John S. Britsios</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-says-spamming-other-sites-can-lower-site-ranking/14996/comment-page-1/#comment-1153452</link>
		<dc:creator>John S. Britsios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=14996#comment-1153452</guid>
		<description>@Michael Martinez, a few days ago I was reading somewhere that it is suspected that if you nofollow one of two links on a page to the same destination, both links will be dropped. What are your views on that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael Martinez, a few days ago I was reading somewhere that it is suspected that if you nofollow one of two links on a page to the same destination, both links will be dropped. What are your views on that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John S. Britsios</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-says-spamming-other-sites-can-lower-site-ranking/14996/comment-page-1/#comment-1153451</link>
		<dc:creator>John S. Britsios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=14996#comment-1153451</guid>
		<description>@Cap Digisoft, why do you say that? Are you also one of those comment spammers? I ask because as I see, you only have two blog posts on your blog and no comments at all. If you were a comment spammer, don&#039;t expect to be penalized over night. If that is the case, sit back and wait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Cap Digisoft, why do you say that? Are you also one of those comment spammers? I ask because as I see, you only have two blog posts on your blog and no comments at all. If you were a comment spammer, don&#8217;t expect to be penalized over night. If that is the case, sit back and wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-says-spamming-other-sites-can-lower-site-ranking/14996/comment-page-1/#comment-1153435</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=14996#comment-1153435</guid>
		<description>Webnauts, the only change Google made concerning nofollow on internal links is to strip the page with nofollowed internal links of the PageRank that would normally be assigned to those links if they were not nofollowed.

Google still handles nofollow as an indicator that a link should not be followed and that it should not be allowed to pass anchor text/PageRank to the destination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Webnauts, the only change Google made concerning nofollow on internal links is to strip the page with nofollowed internal links of the PageRank that would normally be assigned to those links if they were not nofollowed.</p>
<p>Google still handles nofollow as an indicator that a link should not be followed and that it should not be allowed to pass anchor text/PageRank to the destination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CAP Digisoft</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-says-spamming-other-sites-can-lower-site-ranking/14996/comment-page-1/#comment-1153137</link>
		<dc:creator>CAP Digisoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=14996#comment-1153137</guid>
		<description>Thanks god, my website is not one among the websites being blocked by google. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks god, my website is not one among the websites being blocked by google. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syed</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-says-spamming-other-sites-can-lower-site-ranking/14996/comment-page-1/#comment-1152897</link>
		<dc:creator>Syed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=14996#comment-1152897</guid>
		<description>NOFOLLOW does work. In fact, by assigning a NOFOLLOW to all comments you are basically saying that you are not sure or responsible for quality of the website and so are unlikely or less likely to be punished by Google for having spam/bad quality links on your site. 
I personally do not use it as I monitor comment links and remove spam manually. Also, I would prefer to have my blog visitors to benefit from the good ol&#039; PR juice! If the link is relevant (doesn&#039;t matter who posts it), why not give the PR benefit to the site link that was posted?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOFOLLOW does work. In fact, by assigning a NOFOLLOW to all comments you are basically saying that you are not sure or responsible for quality of the website and so are unlikely or less likely to be punished by Google for having spam/bad quality links on your site.<br />
I personally do not use it as I monitor comment links and remove spam manually. Also, I would prefer to have my blog visitors to benefit from the good ol&#8217; PR juice! If the link is relevant (doesn&#8217;t matter who posts it), why not give the PR benefit to the site link that was posted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webmaster Chronic</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-says-spamming-other-sites-can-lower-site-ranking/14996/comment-page-1/#comment-1152420</link>
		<dc:creator>Webmaster Chronic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=14996#comment-1152420</guid>
		<description>Who was it that was complaining a week or so ago about their wife&#039;s blog / site having to be taken down because of comment spammers? Someone A-list, but I can&#039;t remember the name. Heh. 

Anyway...

-kpaul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who was it that was complaining a week or so ago about their wife&#8217;s blog / site having to be taken down because of comment spammers? Someone A-list, but I can&#8217;t remember the name. Heh. </p>
<p>Anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>-kpaul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlo/Carlo At Your Service Productions</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-says-spamming-other-sites-can-lower-site-ranking/14996/comment-page-1/#comment-1152360</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlo/Carlo At Your Service Productions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=14996#comment-1152360</guid>
		<description>More people need to know this. Great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More people need to know this. Great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

