<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Removes Supplemental Results&#160;Labels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vishal</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/comment-page-1/#comment-549791</link>
		<dc:creator>Vishal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 18:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/#comment-549791</guid>
		<description>Ya the supplemental results are gone that is okay but i just wonder now how to find out which pages is read by google frequently and which not. Should I have to check the cache of each page to find out is this page is okay or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya the supplemental results are gone that is okay but i just wonder now how to find out which pages is read by google frequently and which not. Should I have to check the cache of each page to find out is this page is okay or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/comment-page-1/#comment-548242</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 06:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/#comment-548242</guid>
		<description>I actually like the supplemental results to give webmasters a goal of working towards better SEO efforts. Now the search results are limited to per 1000 per site, so in essence, it is a downgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually like the supplemental results to give webmasters a goal of working towards better SEO efforts. Now the search results are limited to per 1000 per site, so in essence, it is a downgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10668844</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/comment-page-1/#comment-543714</link>
		<dc:creator>10668844</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 15:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/#comment-543714</guid>
		<description>@egorych:  Thanks for posting.  So in other words they are making things more difficult. 

I tried using the site:www.XXXX.com/&amp; command and pages that used to show up supplemental for me are no longer there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@egorych:  Thanks for posting.  So in other words they are making things more difficult. </p>
<p>I tried using the site:www.XXXX.com/&amp; command and pages that used to show up supplemental for me are no longer there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egorych</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/comment-page-1/#comment-543700</link>
		<dc:creator>egorych</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/#comment-543700</guid>
		<description>@10668844: There are still main and supplemental index. Now you simply can&#039;t recognize a supplemental page in SERP.  Google says this is because of a new indexing technique (you can read about it in google&#039;s webmasters blog). May be in future there will be only one index, including supplemental.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@10668844: There are still main and supplemental index. Now you simply can&#8217;t recognize a supplemental page in SERP.  Google says this is because of a new indexing technique (you can read about it in google&#8217;s webmasters blog). May be in future there will be only one index, including supplemental.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10668844</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/comment-page-1/#comment-543605</link>
		<dc:creator>10668844</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 12:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/#comment-543605</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little confused.  Does this mean that worrying about getting listed in the  supplemental index is now a thing of the past?  Or does it simply mean we no  longer have a way to evaluate if pages are not meeting  the criteria to be considered a top page?  

I personally found the supplemental category helpful in creating a quality page. 

Someone enlighten me as to what this really means, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little confused.  Does this mean that worrying about getting listed in the  supplemental index is now a thing of the past?  Or does it simply mean we no  longer have a way to evaluate if pages are not meeting  the criteria to be considered a top page?  </p>
<p>I personally found the supplemental category helpful in creating a quality page. </p>
<p>Someone enlighten me as to what this really means, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henri @ B2B sales blog</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/comment-page-1/#comment-543352</link>
		<dc:creator>Henri @ B2B sales blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 08:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/#comment-543352</guid>
		<description>@egorych: Thanks for the tip. I thought we also couldn&#039;t see the Supplemental Results anymore now. However this seems to work :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@egorych: Thanks for the tip. I thought we also couldn&#8217;t see the Supplemental Results anymore now. However this seems to work :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CVOS Netpaths</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/comment-page-1/#comment-543062</link>
		<dc:creator>CVOS Netpaths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 22:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/#comment-543062</guid>
		<description>Removing supplemental results will result in much less confusion. I don&#039;t think the majority of the general public was aware of the SR, but it causes endless confusion for webmasters and SEO&#039;s - few of whom actually understood what supplemental results actually were.

Thankfully, supplemental results are past tense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Removing supplemental results will result in much less confusion. I don&#8217;t think the majority of the general public was aware of the SR, but it causes endless confusion for webmasters and SEO&#8217;s &#8211; few of whom actually understood what supplemental results actually were.</p>
<p>Thankfully, supplemental results are past tense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/comment-page-1/#comment-542927</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/#comment-542927</guid>
		<description>That query does appear to report Supplemental Results pages but we have no way of knowing (based on current knowledge and technique) when the query may stop reporting accurate data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That query does appear to report Supplemental Results pages but we have no way of knowing (based on current knowledge and technique) when the query may stop reporting accurate data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egorych</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/comment-page-1/#comment-542742</link>
		<dc:creator>egorych</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/#comment-542742</guid>
		<description>I mean labels disappered, but you can see SR using that search queue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean labels disappered, but you can see SR using that search queue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egorych</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/comment-page-1/#comment-542739</link>
		<dc:creator>egorych</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-removes-supplemental-results-labels/5407/#comment-542739</guid>
		<description>Try 
site:www.domain.com/&amp;
You&#039;ll see supplemental results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try<br />
site:www.domain.com/&amp;<br />
You&#8217;ll see supplemental results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

