<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Proposes AdWare &amp; Spyware&#160;Guidelines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-proposes-adware-spyware-guidelines/591/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-proposes-adware-spyware-guidelines/591/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:48:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Cea</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-proposes-adware-spyware-guidelines/591/comment-page-1/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Cea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2004 20:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=591#comment-754</guid>
		<description>Some one is looking into it, see the spyware pages at http://www.searchwars.squarespace.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some one is looking into it, see the spyware pages at <a href="http://www.searchwars.squarespace.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.searchwars.squarespace.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark Henly</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-proposes-adware-spyware-guidelines/591/comment-page-1/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>mark Henly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2004 04:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=591#comment-665</guid>
		<description>Nice info I have a new spyware scanner if anyone is interested http://spyware.removal.nospyx.com/free/spyware-scan/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice info I have a new spyware scanner if anyone is interested <a href="http://spyware.removal.nospyx.com/free/spyware-scan/" rel="nofollow">http://spyware.removal.nospyx.com/free/spyware-scan/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-proposes-adware-spyware-guidelines/591/comment-page-1/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2004 16:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=591#comment-584</guid>
		<description>And you think that other companies (such ad Double-Click, Inc., Gator, and others) will obide by this. Google doesn&#039;t own thos companies, and they have the right to disreguard Google&#039;s &quot;comments&quot;. They aren&#039;t rules, and it appears they may not fallow them as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you think that other companies (such ad Double-Click, Inc., Gator, and others) will obide by this. Google doesn&#8217;t own thos companies, and they have the right to disreguard Google&#8217;s &#8220;comments&#8221;. They aren&#8217;t rules, and it appears they may not fallow them as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Wilkins</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-proposes-adware-spyware-guidelines/591/comment-page-1/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Wilkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 20:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=591#comment-539</guid>
		<description>Wow, I didn&#039;t know that about Google. It seems that what they are proposing applies to everyone else, but doesn&#039;t apply to Google. The old saying, &quot;DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO&quot; seems to apply with them. I think the issues are clear, but it is up to the person downloading software to carefully read the download license agreement to fully understand what they are getting with the download and not put the blame on everyone else.  I did install the Google toolbar sometime ago, and I noticed that my Search button in Internet Explorer defaulted/changed to Google, even though I uninstalled the Google Toolbar it still defaults to Google and stayed there in my Internet Explorer... but it is &quot;OK&quot; for Google to do that, because why you might ask? ..... it is because they are &quot;Google&quot; and they are allowed to do that just because they are Google, and everyone else that does something similar is considered &quot;evil&quot; as Google puts it. Amazing. Amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I didn&#8217;t know that about Google. It seems that what they are proposing applies to everyone else, but doesn&#8217;t apply to Google. The old saying, &#8220;DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO&#8221; seems to apply with them. I think the issues are clear, but it is up to the person downloading software to carefully read the download license agreement to fully understand what they are getting with the download and not put the blame on everyone else.  I did install the Google toolbar sometime ago, and I noticed that my Search button in Internet Explorer defaulted/changed to Google, even though I uninstalled the Google Toolbar it still defaults to Google and stayed there in my Internet Explorer&#8230; but it is &#8220;OK&#8221; for Google to do that, because why you might ask? &#8230;.. it is because they are &#8220;Google&#8221; and they are allowed to do that just because they are Google, and everyone else that does something similar is considered &#8220;evil&#8221; as Google puts it. Amazing. Amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael O'Toole</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-proposes-adware-spyware-guidelines/591/comment-page-1/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael O'Toole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 04:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=591#comment-534</guid>
		<description>Amazing how Google would propose this. They are planning to bundle their toolbar with Real Networks real player, the king of all spyware/adware. Also they partner with Ask Jeeves which now owns all of those MyWebSearch Adware toolbar installing programs, like smileycentral, popswatter, etc. Also during the install of the Google toolbar it automatically defaults to change your URL search to Google, (in small print) I guess what they are proposing is that other companies not do adware/sneakware but it&#039;s ok for them. I wish people would look into this and expose them.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing how Google would propose this. They are planning to bundle their toolbar with Real Networks real player, the king of all spyware/adware. Also they partner with Ask Jeeves which now owns all of those MyWebSearch Adware toolbar installing programs, like smileycentral, popswatter, etc. Also during the install of the Google toolbar it automatically defaults to change your URL search to Google, (in small print) I guess what they are proposing is that other companies not do adware/sneakware but it&#8217;s ok for them. I wish people would look into this and expose them.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engines Directory</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-proposes-adware-spyware-guidelines/591/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engines Directory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 04:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=591#comment-533</guid>
		<description>This is a good move by google and it will definately help the users and netizines</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good move by google and it will definately help the users and netizines</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

