<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Now Showing Local Results for State Wide&#160;Searches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-now-showing-local-results-for-state-wide-searches/16510/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-now-showing-local-results-for-state-wide-searches/16510/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Ramsey</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-now-showing-local-results-for-state-wide-searches/16510/comment-page-1/#comment-1183373</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Ramsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16510#comment-1183373</guid>
		<description>@David,

Nice Find! In my furious typing and looking at results, I didn&#039;t noticed the D.C.! I caught it on the new york search with displays for NYC, but Washington got me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David,</p>
<p>Nice Find! In my furious typing and looking at results, I didn&#8217;t noticed the D.C.! I caught it on the new york search with displays for NYC, but Washington got me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Westbrook</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-now-showing-local-results-for-state-wide-searches/16510/comment-page-1/#comment-1182940</link>
		<dc:creator>David Westbrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16510#comment-1182940</guid>
		<description>Curious how you came up with the Washington results for the state of Washington.  I am in Portland and it I get the same set of results for Washington or DC or District of Columbia.  Never are there any Washington State results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious how you came up with the Washington results for the state of Washington.  I am in Portland and it I get the same set of results for Washington or DC or District of Columbia.  Never are there any Washington State results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Ramsey</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-now-showing-local-results-for-state-wide-searches/16510/comment-page-1/#comment-1182319</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Ramsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 05:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16510#comment-1182319</guid>
		<description>Your Too Kind Miriam! That same though is being discussed on the sphinn comments of this post with Matt, EarlPearl, Silversmith, and myself. 

Some good points have been mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your Too Kind Miriam! That same though is being discussed on the sphinn comments of this post with Matt, EarlPearl, Silversmith, and myself. </p>
<p>Some good points have been mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiriamEllis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-now-showing-local-results-for-state-wide-searches/16510/comment-page-1/#comment-1182211</link>
		<dc:creator>MiriamEllis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16510#comment-1182211</guid>
		<description>Excellent choice of a guest post author, SEJ! Mike Ramsey is going places in Local!

Mike, this was a very nicely put together piece, and I really enjoyed reading your basic stats. I would guess that we&#039;ll be seeing further rollout of this, nationwide, and for certain terms, it is certainly be helpful to see statewide results. For others, it&#039;s a bit of stretch to imagine usefulness. Why would someone need to see statewide listings, for example, of Italian restaurants? Well, maybe they are traveling and their doctor has ordered them to eat only Italian food? Well...hmm. Nevertheless, for other categories, this is an interesting and useful development. You&#039;ve done a great job covering it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent choice of a guest post author, SEJ! Mike Ramsey is going places in Local!</p>
<p>Mike, this was a very nicely put together piece, and I really enjoyed reading your basic stats. I would guess that we&#8217;ll be seeing further rollout of this, nationwide, and for certain terms, it is certainly be helpful to see statewide results. For others, it&#8217;s a bit of stretch to imagine usefulness. Why would someone need to see statewide listings, for example, of Italian restaurants? Well, maybe they are traveling and their doctor has ordered them to eat only Italian food? Well&#8230;hmm. Nevertheless, for other categories, this is an interesting and useful development. You&#8217;ve done a great job covering it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth Fach</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-now-showing-local-results-for-state-wide-searches/16510/comment-page-1/#comment-1182164</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Fach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 22:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16510#comment-1182164</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t keep up with all the cool things Google is up to. I know the trend seems to be in localism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t keep up with all the cool things Google is up to. I know the trend seems to be in localism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earlpearl</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-now-showing-local-results-for-state-wide-searches/16510/comment-page-1/#comment-1182110</link>
		<dc:creator>Earlpearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16510#comment-1182110</guid>
		<description>Nice article, Mike.  I appreciate the extra work, specifically the graph that shows which states are showing maps and which aren&#039;t.  Doesn&#039;t look there is a concrete reason to which states are and which states aren&#039;t.

For some time the smaller eastern states, such as Maryland, Delaware, Mass, etc. have been showing maps for queries with state names.

We operate businesses that optimize for state names and city/town names.  We get a good reasonable amount of traffic for searches with state names.  I&#039;ve done some keyword research on a limited basis comparing searches with service or product  and state name or major city name.   The volumes of whether state or city names appear more often have tended to show state phrases more often...but it isn&#039;t a significant difference in some cases and it varies.  I can&#039;t say with authority as to what works.

Of the businesses that attract traffic for product or service  or reversed  product or services.....here is what we experience.

1.  We have strong rankings for the state name phrases so we pick up a good bit of service.
2.  Our services/products are in demand on a local or regional basis.   Frankly, if we are on one side of the state and the searcher has hit our site, even contacted us....and he/she is too far away....we aren&#039;t getting their business (most...but not all of the time).
3.  We pick up additional searches,  traffic, and business for those searchers that use the state terms and are reasonably near by.   

Optimizing for state names can add traffic and business for your site.  

I&#039;m not going to say use it all the time or don&#039;t use it.  It is a case by case example.  I can say that searches with state names are definitely out there.

4.  One last observation.  If you are searching for something in one of those physically  larger states now showing maps, such as Utah...and you are a searcher from the Southwest corner of the state...where there are a group of towns and population....you aren&#039;t traveling up to the Salt Lake Metro region for Utah Italian restaurants and lasagna.  :)

If you scroll around the map, and southward to that portion of the state...the map will move with you and the businesses showing up will adjust and reflect the newer geography.  You&#039;ll find maps suggestions for restaurants closer to you.  Essentially it would be similar to searching for one of those town names in the Southwest corner of the State.

Thank goodness.  I love lasagna.  I love eating out.  I just don&#039;t want to have to drive 3-6 hours each way for a plate of lasagna.  ;)

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, Mike.  I appreciate the extra work, specifically the graph that shows which states are showing maps and which aren&#8217;t.  Doesn&#8217;t look there is a concrete reason to which states are and which states aren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>For some time the smaller eastern states, such as Maryland, Delaware, Mass, etc. have been showing maps for queries with state names.</p>
<p>We operate businesses that optimize for state names and city/town names.  We get a good reasonable amount of traffic for searches with state names.  I&#8217;ve done some keyword research on a limited basis comparing searches with service or product  and state name or major city name.   The volumes of whether state or city names appear more often have tended to show state phrases more often&#8230;but it isn&#8217;t a significant difference in some cases and it varies.  I can&#8217;t say with authority as to what works.</p>
<p>Of the businesses that attract traffic for product or service  or reversed  product or services&#8230;..here is what we experience.</p>
<p>1.  We have strong rankings for the state name phrases so we pick up a good bit of service.<br />
2.  Our services/products are in demand on a local or regional basis.   Frankly, if we are on one side of the state and the searcher has hit our site, even contacted us&#8230;.and he/she is too far away&#8230;.we aren&#8217;t getting their business (most&#8230;but not all of the time).<br />
3.  We pick up additional searches,  traffic, and business for those searchers that use the state terms and are reasonably near by.   </p>
<p>Optimizing for state names can add traffic and business for your site.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to say use it all the time or don&#8217;t use it.  It is a case by case example.  I can say that searches with state names are definitely out there.</p>
<p>4.  One last observation.  If you are searching for something in one of those physically  larger states now showing maps, such as Utah&#8230;and you are a searcher from the Southwest corner of the state&#8230;where there are a group of towns and population&#8230;.you aren&#8217;t traveling up to the Salt Lake Metro region for Utah Italian restaurants and lasagna.  :)</p>
<p>If you scroll around the map, and southward to that portion of the state&#8230;the map will move with you and the businesses showing up will adjust and reflect the newer geography.  You&#8217;ll find maps suggestions for restaurants closer to you.  Essentially it would be similar to searching for one of those town names in the Southwest corner of the State.</p>
<p>Thank goodness.  I love lasagna.  I love eating out.  I just don&#8217;t want to have to drive 3-6 hours each way for a plate of lasagna.  ;)</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Bleiweiss</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-now-showing-local-results-for-state-wide-searches/16510/comment-page-1/#comment-1182055</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Bleiweiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16510#comment-1182055</guid>
		<description>Mike, I guess my vision was limited having mostly lived and provided solutions to clients in bigger States.  Someone from San Francisco for example, wouldn&#039;t ever need or want to go to a dentist 800 miles away in southern California :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, I guess my vision was limited having mostly lived and provided solutions to clients in bigger States.  Someone from San Francisco for example, wouldn&#8217;t ever need or want to go to a dentist 800 miles away in southern California :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Bleiweiss</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-now-showing-local-results-for-state-wide-searches/16510/comment-page-1/#comment-1182052</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Bleiweiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16510#comment-1182052</guid>
		<description>Good point.  Here in the San Francisco bay area, it&#039;s not uncommon for someone in Marin County to hire a company or use the services of a company across the bay - driving over a bridge is involved but it&#039;s still ultimately only 10 - 20 miles.  So there&#039;s a lot of search for &quot;bay area contractors&quot; for example.  And that makes more sense to me from a physical size perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point.  Here in the San Francisco bay area, it&#8217;s not uncommon for someone in Marin County to hire a company or use the services of a company across the bay &#8211; driving over a bridge is involved but it&#8217;s still ultimately only 10 &#8211; 20 miles.  So there&#8217;s a lot of search for &#8220;bay area contractors&#8221; for example.  And that makes more sense to me from a physical size perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Reese</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-now-showing-local-results-for-state-wide-searches/16510/comment-page-1/#comment-1182049</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Reese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16510#comment-1182049</guid>
		<description>@Alan I agree with you regarding a lot of the typical local searches (dentists, doctors, mechanics, etc.) However, I think it would be really useful for users to see more local searches for specific searches over a wider geographic area (like the one Mike mentioned about Colorado spa&#039;s).  It&#039;s already bleeding over state lines for a lot of border towns (For example, a number of local searches of Spokane, WA + category yield a North Idaho local result).  I think it would be helpful if you could look for &quot;Northern California Spa&#039;s&quot; or &quot;Eastern Washington Wineries&quot; and get a local result.  It really depends on the industry/business, though.  Not sure how the engines would address who is worthy of a statewide local result and who is not (from a usability standpoint) .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alan I agree with you regarding a lot of the typical local searches (dentists, doctors, mechanics, etc.) However, I think it would be really useful for users to see more local searches for specific searches over a wider geographic area (like the one Mike mentioned about Colorado spa&#8217;s).  It&#8217;s already bleeding over state lines for a lot of border towns (For example, a number of local searches of Spokane, WA + category yield a North Idaho local result).  I think it would be helpful if you could look for &#8220;Northern California Spa&#8217;s&#8221; or &#8220;Eastern Washington Wineries&#8221; and get a local result.  It really depends on the industry/business, though.  Not sure how the engines would address who is worthy of a statewide local result and who is not (from a usability standpoint) .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Ramsey</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-now-showing-local-results-for-state-wide-searches/16510/comment-page-1/#comment-1182045</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Ramsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16510#comment-1182045</guid>
		<description>@Alan

Every Search is different.. I used did a quick glance using the keyword tool and heres what I found...

Utah Dentist  22,220
Salt Lake City Dentist 8,100

Boise Dentist 5,400
Idaho Dentist (not enough data)

Everyone will have to look at their location and determine if the state or city level is more important, or if both are.  Some companies will never need or be able to gain statewide customers, some will. 

I lived in Utah for a while and I would be willing to drive from Odgen to Provo for an recommended dentist. The distance does &quot;feel&quot; to far. 

But I currently live in Idaho and with so much dead space between cities, I am waaaay more likely to use services that are close by. Even though I could be in Boise, or even close to Salt Lake in 2+ hours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alan</p>
<p>Every Search is different.. I used did a quick glance using the keyword tool and heres what I found&#8230;</p>
<p>Utah Dentist  22,220<br />
Salt Lake City Dentist 8,100</p>
<p>Boise Dentist 5,400<br />
Idaho Dentist (not enough data)</p>
<p>Everyone will have to look at their location and determine if the state or city level is more important, or if both are.  Some companies will never need or be able to gain statewide customers, some will. </p>
<p>I lived in Utah for a while and I would be willing to drive from Odgen to Provo for an recommended dentist. The distance does &#8220;feel&#8221; to far. </p>
<p>But I currently live in Idaho and with so much dead space between cities, I am waaaay more likely to use services that are close by. Even though I could be in Boise, or even close to Salt Lake in 2+ hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

