<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Issues Notice of Change in Ad Display URL&#160;Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-issues-notice-of-change-in-ad-display-url-policy/6399/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-issues-notice-of-change-in-ad-display-url-policy/6399/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:21:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Montwill &#124; Sharingmatters.com</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-issues-notice-of-change-in-ad-display-url-policy/6399/comment-page-1/#comment-972866</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Montwill &#124; Sharingmatters.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-issues-notice-of-change-in-ad-display-url-policy/6399/#comment-972866</guid>
		<description>It should not be a problem for affiliate websites as long as the final landing page URL (after redirect) is the same as displayed one. 

Bigger problem will be when dealing with long URLs - it will require more mod_rewrite manipulation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should not be a problem for affiliate websites as long as the final landing page URL (after redirect) is the same as displayed one. </p>
<p>Bigger problem will be when dealing with long URLs &#8211; it will require more mod_rewrite manipulation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PPC Agency</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-issues-notice-of-change-in-ad-display-url-policy/6399/comment-page-1/#comment-972380</link>
		<dc:creator>PPC Agency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-issues-notice-of-change-in-ad-display-url-policy/6399/#comment-972380</guid>
		<description>This could cause a number of problems for affiliate websites. I think its a good move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could cause a number of problems for affiliate websites. I think its a good move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sushubh</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-issues-notice-of-change-in-ad-display-url-policy/6399/comment-page-1/#comment-972066</link>
		<dc:creator>Sushubh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 05:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-issues-notice-of-change-in-ad-display-url-policy/6399/#comment-972066</guid>
		<description>still wont stop people from throwing people to shopping sites through their affiliate ID based links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still wont stop people from throwing people to shopping sites through their affiliate ID based links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

