<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Introduces Google Gadget&#160;Ventures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-introduces-google-gadget-ventures/5224/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-introduces-google-gadget-ventures/5224/</link>
	<description>Latest Search Engine News from the Search Engine Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:53:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hagrin</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-introduces-google-gadget-ventures/5224/comment-page-1/#comment-507403</link>
		<dc:creator>Hagrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-introduces-google-gadget-ventures/5224/#comment-507403</guid>
		<description>I have to also say that this is such an incredibly smart and respected (by me) move from Google. All you have to do is look at the story of Craig Ulliot who developed a Facebook application and is now spending about 5 grand/year just to keep the application up and running while meeting demand.  It behooves the big companies to eliminate the burden on developers who successfully extend their application.  

The negative you speak of would occurs regardless as the more popular their applications get, the more ad impressions they can deliver, the more accidental/intentional clicks, the more revenue, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to also say that this is such an incredibly smart and respected (by me) move from Google. All you have to do is look at the story of Craig Ulliot who developed a Facebook application and is now spending about 5 grand/year just to keep the application up and running while meeting demand.  It behooves the big companies to eliminate the burden on developers who successfully extend their application.  </p>
<p>The negative you speak of would occurs regardless as the more popular their applications get, the more ad impressions they can deliver, the more accidental/intentional clicks, the more revenue, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LifesPerspective</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-introduces-google-gadget-ventures/5224/comment-page-1/#comment-507209</link>
		<dc:creator>LifesPerspective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-introduces-google-gadget-ventures/5224/#comment-507209</guid>
		<description>don&#039;t like to say this, but this is another one of Google&#039;s great ideas. I think its good that they are investing in others to grow their business. Quite sure many will come forward and contribute to their already impressive arsenal..... I worry for the others</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#8217;t like to say this, but this is another one of Google&#8217;s great ideas. I think its good that they are investing in others to grow their business. Quite sure many will come forward and contribute to their already impressive arsenal&#8230;.. I worry for the others</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
