<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google AdWords Now On Google&#160;News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-expands-ad-display-property-to-google-news-search/8856/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-expands-ad-display-property-to-google-news-search/8856/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: locomo</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-expands-ad-display-property-to-google-news-search/8856/comment-page-1/#comment-1110533</link>
		<dc:creator>locomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=8856#comment-1110533</guid>
		<description>Recently I noticed for certain political news, google seem to pick more from fringe news networks than from networks maintained by more mainstream news papers.  Could it be that google has been paid for the news preference (bias)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I noticed for certain political news, google seem to pick more from fringe news networks than from networks maintained by more mainstream news papers.  Could it be that google has been paid for the news preference (bias)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dale lobo</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-expands-ad-display-property-to-google-news-search/8856/comment-page-1/#comment-1094621</link>
		<dc:creator>dale lobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 06:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=8856#comment-1094621</guid>
		<description>I had mixed views about Google deciding to advertise on Google News.  After all its their property and they can choose what they want to do with it.  Just when i was contemplating about this,  i came across an article on http://www.empoweredseo.com/seo-internet-marketing-blog/.  It has a practical and definitive approach to the matter dealt with in this article. A must read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had mixed views about Google deciding to advertise on Google News.  After all its their property and they can choose what they want to do with it.  Just when i was contemplating about this,  i came across an article on <a href="http://www.empoweredseo.com/seo-internet-marketing-blog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.empoweredseo.com/seo-internet-marketing-blog/</a>.  It has a practical and definitive approach to the matter dealt with in this article. A must read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Livingston - Pay Per Click Search Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-expands-ad-display-property-to-google-news-search/8856/comment-page-1/#comment-1094474</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Livingston - Pay Per Click Search Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=8856#comment-1094474</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually entirely in favor of it.  

Google has consistently operated on the principle of hyper-relevancy, and has ongoingly made online markets more efficient.   Their principles continually put the user first ... what&#039;s wrong with their expanding their reach and allowing their users to connect with relevant advertisers?

Do we forbid The New York Times from carrying advertising?  Do we even suggest they are less than objective because of it?

For what it&#039;s worth,

Glenn :-)

Glenn Livingston, Ph.D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually entirely in favor of it.  </p>
<p>Google has consistently operated on the principle of hyper-relevancy, and has ongoingly made online markets more efficient.   Their principles continually put the user first &#8230; what&#8217;s wrong with their expanding their reach and allowing their users to connect with relevant advertisers?</p>
<p>Do we forbid The New York Times from carrying advertising?  Do we even suggest they are less than objective because of it?</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth,</p>
<p>Glenn :-)</p>
<p>Glenn Livingston, Ph.D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Engago Team</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-expands-ad-display-property-to-google-news-search/8856/comment-page-1/#comment-1094419</link>
		<dc:creator>Engago Team</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=8856#comment-1094419</guid>
		<description>People will start ignoring even more the online ads.  results of Eye tracking research ave proven that people look at a page scanning like an &quot;F&quot;.
Exactly where there are no ads.
The more ads Google stuffs, the less we will see.
Less Is More.
That&#039;s how Google started: minimalistic and clean.
Now Google properties have has become cluttered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People will start ignoring even more the online ads.  results of Eye tracking research ave proven that people look at a page scanning like an &#8220;F&#8221;.<br />
Exactly where there are no ads.<br />
The more ads Google stuffs, the less we will see.<br />
Less Is More.<br />
That&#8217;s how Google started: minimalistic and clean.<br />
Now Google properties have has become cluttered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

