<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Inks Advertising Deal with DISH&#160;Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-dish-network/4647/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-dish-network/4647/</link>
	<description>Latest Search Engine News from the Search Engine Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:38:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Redinger</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-dish-network/4647/comment-page-1/#comment-437081</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Redinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/4647/4647/#comment-437081</guid>
		<description>EchoStar is letting Google take the risk in this deal.  The comments from the NYT article make me think that Google will have to dramatically increase ad prices in order for this partnership to make sense.  I wrote about this here: http://themediaage.com/?p=47</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EchoStar is letting Google take the risk in this deal.  The comments from the NYT article make me think that Google will have to dramatically increase ad prices in order for this partnership to make sense.  I wrote about this here: <a href="http://themediaage.com/?p=47" rel="nofollow">http://themediaage.com/?p=47</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
