<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Defines Good Linking &amp; Bad&#160;Linking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-defines-good-linking-bad-linking/4138/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-defines-good-linking-bad-linking/4138/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:40:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ROI</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-defines-good-linking-bad-linking/4138/comment-page-1/#comment-1271047</link>
		<dc:creator>ROI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 14:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4138#comment-1271047</guid>
		<description>agree, if you focus on the user and traffic you can&#039;t lose</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agree, if you focus on the user and traffic you can&#39;t lose</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ROI</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-defines-good-linking-bad-linking/4138/comment-page-1/#comment-1256205</link>
		<dc:creator>ROI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 09:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4138#comment-1256205</guid>
		<description>agree, if you focus on the user and traffic you can&#039;t lose</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agree, if you focus on the user and traffic you can&#39;t lose</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rankONE</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-defines-good-linking-bad-linking/4138/comment-page-1/#comment-1140740</link>
		<dc:creator>rankONE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4138#comment-1140740</guid>
		<description>Yahoo answers now puts a nofollow onto its links, so has no value in SEO terms, but does bring in valueable traffic to those who visite the site and does appear in the search engine itself when looking for sertain things on Google - it is deffinately worth getting some answers in there that will benifit clients + your own website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo answers now puts a nofollow onto its links, so has no value in SEO terms, but does bring in valueable traffic to those who visite the site and does appear in the search engine itself when looking for sertain things on Google &#8211; it is deffinately worth getting some answers in there that will benifit clients + your own website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meri Garcia</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-defines-good-linking-bad-linking/4138/comment-page-1/#comment-1134042</link>
		<dc:creator>Meri Garcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4138#comment-1134042</guid>
		<description>I might be a little late for this response but I after reading the article and responses I have the same doubts as Chris...how does Google know if I have paid or not for a link (an actiual link)...do they penalise you for giving any type of money even if it&#039;s a registration fee? 
In any case, as an SEO expert for www.websiteredevelopment.com and www.analyticsseo.com I follow the rules of the big guys (aka Google)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might be a little late for this response but I after reading the article and responses I have the same doubts as Chris&#8230;how does Google know if I have paid or not for a link (an actiual link)&#8230;do they penalise you for giving any type of money even if it&#8217;s a registration fee?<br />
In any case, as an SEO expert for <a href="http://www.websiteredevelopment.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.websiteredevelopment.com</a> and <a href="http://www.analyticsseo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.analyticsseo.com</a> I follow the rules of the big guys (aka Google)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Edwards</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-defines-good-linking-bad-linking/4138/comment-page-1/#comment-1100850</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 13:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4138#comment-1100850</guid>
		<description>Blogged about it, linked to it, and for good measure threw in a Digg as well. Thanks for the effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogged about it, linked to it, and for good measure threw in a Digg as well. Thanks for the effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: narendra</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-defines-good-linking-bad-linking/4138/comment-page-1/#comment-1099991</link>
		<dc:creator>narendra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 12:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4138#comment-1099991</guid>
		<description>gr8, That’s some pretty hot suggestions from Google there. If I hear that right they are suggesting that SEO is more about making the websites good for the users rather than fodder for the search engines and that link quality continues to play an increasing role in the value of a website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gr8, That’s some pretty hot suggestions from Google there. If I hear that right they are suggesting that SEO is more about making the websites good for the users rather than fodder for the search engines and that link quality continues to play an increasing role in the value of a website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotanimegirls</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-defines-good-linking-bad-linking/4138/comment-page-1/#comment-1087974</link>
		<dc:creator>hotanimegirls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4138#comment-1087974</guid>
		<description>They have no idea. They just want to confuse you all. It is a great when all play in one hole. You don’ t have to run around and look after each one.

“I’m still struggling to figure out how they can identify purchased links. “</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have no idea. They just want to confuse you all. It is a great when all play in one hole. You don’ t have to run around and look after each one.</p>
<p>“I’m still struggling to figure out how they can identify purchased links. “</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotanimegirls.net</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-defines-good-linking-bad-linking/4138/comment-page-1/#comment-1087973</link>
		<dc:creator>hotanimegirls.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4138#comment-1087973</guid>
		<description>They have no idea. They just want to confuse you all. It is a great when all play in one hole. You don&#039; t have to run around and look after each one.

&quot;I’m still struggling to figure out how they can identify purchased links. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have no idea. They just want to confuse you all. It is a great when all play in one hole. You don&#8217; t have to run around and look after each one.</p>
<p>&#8220;I’m still struggling to figure out how they can identify purchased links. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYC</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-defines-good-linking-bad-linking/4138/comment-page-1/#comment-1084708</link>
		<dc:creator>NYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4138#comment-1084708</guid>
		<description>Great article. I&#039;m very new to the SEO thing, and it&#039;s good to know that as long as I do things the right way, I should be rewarded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. I&#8217;m very new to the SEO thing, and it&#8217;s good to know that as long as I do things the right way, I should be rewarded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doudy</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-defines-good-linking-bad-linking/4138/comment-page-1/#comment-1081478</link>
		<dc:creator>Doudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4138#comment-1081478</guid>
		<description>I think we will never have a straight answer on the importance of Google PR as an SEO tool monitor, there are quite few controversial opinions!!!

Doudy @ http://optimizingsearchengine.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we will never have a straight answer on the importance of Google PR as an SEO tool monitor, there are quite few controversial opinions!!!</p>
<p>Doudy @ <a href="http://optimizingsearchengine.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://optimizingsearchengine.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

