<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Crawling Javascript Links with Clean&#160;URLs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-crawling-javascript-links-with-clean-urls/3352/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-crawling-javascript-links-with-clean-urls/3352/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seyed Mohammad Hossein Mayboudi</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-crawling-javascript-links-with-clean-urls/3352/comment-page-1/#comment-1095424</link>
		<dc:creator>Seyed Mohammad Hossein Mayboudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3352#comment-1095424</guid>
		<description>&quot;Not actually executing, as far as I know -- but taking javascript as text, and then seeing if something that looks like a url may be in the script. &quot; from tedster #:713780</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Not actually executing, as far as I know &#8212; but taking javascript as text, and then seeing if something that looks like a url may be in the script. &#8221; from tedster #:713780</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.S. Babaei</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-crawling-javascript-links-with-clean-urls/3352/comment-page-1/#comment-781122</link>
		<dc:creator>M.S. Babaei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3352#comment-781122</guid>
		<description>really can google crawl javascript links...

for example, ajax pages from database</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really can google crawl javascript links&#8230;</p>
<p>for example, ajax pages from database</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam George</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-crawling-javascript-links-with-clean-urls/3352/comment-page-1/#comment-325557</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3352#comment-325557</guid>
		<description>Some JavaScript code is more search engine friendly than others. As a general rule of thumb, the simpler the script is, the more likely a search engine spider can crawl the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some JavaScript code is more search engine friendly than others. As a general rule of thumb, the simpler the script is, the more likely a search engine spider can crawl the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-crawling-javascript-links-with-clean-urls/3352/comment-page-1/#comment-99101</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 21:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3352#comment-99101</guid>
		<description>The first Javascript crawl that I know of came out of Stanford University several years ago.  Google has been fetching my Javascript template files for 2-3 years.  Matt Cutts has confirmed on his blog that Google does in fact look at the Javascript in an effort to determine what its purpose is.

I&#039;ve long felt it was only a matter of time before they started crawling the URLs they find in the Javascript.  They don&#039;t have to execute the code to parse it for fetchable URLs.  Whether they&#039;ll factors those links into their other indexing functions is a whole &#039;nother issue.

But as Google expands it Javascript crawling, many Webmasters should take this as a hopeful sign that they can continue to use the type of internal navigation they prefer without having to worry about whether their pages will be crawled.

Of course, I&#039;m not expecting Google to radicalize its crawling over night -- other than what they just did with Big Daddy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first Javascript crawl that I know of came out of Stanford University several years ago.  Google has been fetching my Javascript template files for 2-3 years.  Matt Cutts has confirmed on his blog that Google does in fact look at the Javascript in an effort to determine what its purpose is.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve long felt it was only a matter of time before they started crawling the URLs they find in the Javascript.  They don&#8217;t have to execute the code to parse it for fetchable URLs.  Whether they&#8217;ll factors those links into their other indexing functions is a whole &#8216;nother issue.</p>
<p>But as Google expands it Javascript crawling, many Webmasters should take this as a hopeful sign that they can continue to use the type of internal navigation they prefer without having to worry about whether their pages will be crawled.</p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;m not expecting Google to radicalize its crawling over night &#8212; other than what they just did with Big Daddy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engines WEB</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-crawling-javascript-links-with-clean-urls/3352/comment-page-1/#comment-99070</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engines WEB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 20:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3352#comment-99070</guid>
		<description>This, basically, has been going on for quite some time ...

Here is a more recent controversial example ....

googlesystem.blogspot.com/2006/03/googlebot-can-destroy-sites.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This, basically, has been going on for quite some time &#8230;</p>
<p>Here is a more recent controversial example &#8230;.</p>
<p>googlesystem.blogspot.com/2006/03/googlebot-can-destroy-sites.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-crawling-javascript-links-with-clean-urls/3352/comment-page-1/#comment-98994</link>
		<dc:creator>Clark Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 17:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3352#comment-98994</guid>
		<description>I have had a similar experience yesterday where my stats had googlebot logged as a visitor using only javascript for the stats, after checking the ip it pointed to mountain view so at first i thought those nice guys and gals are giving me a vist then afterwards i thought maybe its one of their new bots which  is looking for javascript redirects etc..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had a similar experience yesterday where my stats had googlebot logged as a visitor using only javascript for the stats, after checking the ip it pointed to mountain view so at first i thought those nice guys and gals are giving me a vist then afterwards i thought maybe its one of their new bots which  is looking for javascript redirects etc..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

