<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Buying Writely in GDrive&#160;Plans?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-buying-writely-in-gdrive-plans/3078/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-buying-writely-in-gdrive-plans/3078/</link>
	<description>Latest Search Engine News from the Search Engine Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:06:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SF Media Enthusiast</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-buying-writely-in-gdrive-plans/3078/comment-page-1/#comment-66612</link>
		<dc:creator>SF Media Enthusiast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 17:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3078#comment-66612</guid>
		<description>This seems like a logical decision for Google to evaluate Writely. This software + usage model will allow google to gain greater share of user data. More data means deeper entry barriers into their crown jewel search and ad business. I&#039;ll be curious to see how issues such as privacy and data ownership are ultimately addressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like a logical decision for Google to evaluate Writely. This software + usage model will allow google to gain greater share of user data. More data means deeper entry barriers into their crown jewel search and ad business. I&#8217;ll be curious to see how issues such as privacy and data ownership are ultimately addressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
