<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Adds Site Traffic Analytics to Google&#160;Trends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-adds-site-traffic-analytics-to-google-trends/7172/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-adds-site-traffic-analytics-to-google-trends/7172/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suresh</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-adds-site-traffic-analytics-to-google-trends/7172/comment-page-1/#comment-1083867</link>
		<dc:creator>Suresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-adds-site-traffic-analytics-to-google-trends/7172/#comment-1083867</guid>
		<description>This tool is good enough, but if we check some sites owned by Google 

like youtube.com, orkut.com, blogger.com, google.com 

We could not get any thing about these sites. Google hide its own information but shows others.

How&#039;s that tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This tool is good enough, but if we check some sites owned by Google </p>
<p>like youtube.com, orkut.com, blogger.com, google.com </p>
<p>We could not get any thing about these sites. Google hide its own information but shows others.</p>
<p>How&#8217;s that tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gautamm Mehra</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-adds-site-traffic-analytics-to-google-trends/7172/comment-page-1/#comment-1081490</link>
		<dc:creator>Gautamm Mehra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-adds-site-traffic-analytics-to-google-trends/7172/#comment-1081490</guid>
		<description>Its a great service. In fact, if you look at it statistically google has a much larger data population, more dynamic, distributed and makes an ideal data sample to analyze on. 

With added segmentation of regionwise and a hint into the TA&#039;s mind, it turns into a powerful tool for anybody marketing online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a great service. In fact, if you look at it statistically google has a much larger data population, more dynamic, distributed and makes an ideal data sample to analyze on. </p>
<p>With added segmentation of regionwise and a hint into the TA&#8217;s mind, it turns into a powerful tool for anybody marketing online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR  NY</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-adds-site-traffic-analytics-to-google-trends/7172/comment-page-1/#comment-1081469</link>
		<dc:creator>PR  NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 08:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-adds-site-traffic-analytics-to-google-trends/7172/#comment-1081469</guid>
		<description>The only problem with tis service is that a site has to be getting a very high amount of traffic to appear in the results.

Compete is not so extreme.

So only popular sites can take advantage of the Trends features for now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem with tis service is that a site has to be getting a very high amount of traffic to appear in the results.</p>
<p>Compete is not so extreme.</p>
<p>So only popular sites can take advantage of the Trends features for now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Simister</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-adds-site-traffic-analytics-to-google-trends/7172/comment-page-1/#comment-1081446</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Simister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-adds-site-traffic-analytics-to-google-trends/7172/#comment-1081446</guid>
		<description>In some ways this will just be a more representative version of what we are seeing on Alexa but there are some worrying trends here about dishing out sensitive information.

If Google have hidden YouTube it is clear that they are aware of the issue so what are we to think

One rule for Google, another for the rest of us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In some ways this will just be a more representative version of what we are seeing on Alexa but there are some worrying trends here about dishing out sensitive information.</p>
<p>If Google have hidden YouTube it is clear that they are aware of the issue so what are we to think</p>
<p>One rule for Google, another for the rest of us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

