<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gigablast Better than Google or Ask.com : According to&#160;Study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/comment-page-1/#comment-1270962</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 02:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/#comment-1270962</guid>
		<description>I decided to test them out after seeing the Gigablast search engine in the new Nightmare on Elm Street movie. After finding that Gigablst retrieved 0 results for something that Google found 491 results for I emailed Gigablast to let them know that I tried them out and what I had found.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They emailed me back and called me a &quot;dick&quot;. How&#039;s that for PR?&lt;br&gt;Won&#039;t be using them, ever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I decided to test them out after seeing the Gigablast search engine in the new Nightmare on Elm Street movie. After finding that Gigablst retrieved 0 results for something that Google found 491 results for I emailed Gigablast to let them know that I tried them out and what I had found.</p>
<p>They emailed me back and called me a &#8220;dick&#8221;. How&#39;s that for PR?<br />Won&#39;t be using them, ever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/comment-page-1/#comment-1256634</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 21:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/#comment-1256634</guid>
		<description>I decided to test them out after seeing the Gigablast search engine in the new Nightmare on Elm Street movie. After finding that Gigablst retrieved 0 results for something that Google found 491 results for I emailed Gigablast to let them know that I tried them out and what I had found.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They emailed me back and called me a &quot;dick&quot;. How&#039;s that for PR?&lt;br&gt;Won&#039;t be using them, ever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I decided to test them out after seeing the Gigablast search engine in the new Nightmare on Elm Street movie. After finding that Gigablst retrieved 0 results for something that Google found 491 results for I emailed Gigablast to let them know that I tried them out and what I had found.</p>
<p>They emailed me back and called me a &#8220;dick&#8221;. How&#39;s that for PR?<br />Won&#39;t be using them, ever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/comment-page-1/#comment-1173724</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 05:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/#comment-1173724</guid>
		<description>Why then Gigablast isn&#039;t used by 80% of US web users like Google? Forty-eight sample search queries are in no way representative selection to compare with. Google gets millions queries a day and people like the results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why then Gigablast isn&#8217;t used by 80% of US web users like Google? Forty-eight sample search queries are in no way representative selection to compare with. Google gets millions queries a day and people like the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dreamer</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/comment-page-1/#comment-1109601</link>
		<dc:creator>dreamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/#comment-1109601</guid>
		<description>Of course they found that... they were doing the study!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course they found that&#8230; they were doing the study!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/comment-page-1/#comment-1106278</link>
		<dc:creator>sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/#comment-1106278</guid>
		<description>its terrible dan. were you drunk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its terrible dan. were you drunk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harry poting</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/comment-page-1/#comment-1105260</link>
		<dc:creator>harry poting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/#comment-1105260</guid>
		<description>I like google as a search engine, but for my homepage i like www.azokan.com because you have everything that u used to have with google and much more sites to search in.
fast, easy and useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like google as a search engine, but for my homepage i like <a href="http://www.azokan.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.azokan.com</a> because you have everything that u used to have with google and much more sites to search in.<br />
fast, easy and useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/comment-page-1/#comment-1099963</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 22:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/#comment-1099963</guid>
		<description>hmmm not sure if I agree.

Just did several search&#039;s on some items and Google seemed to give me the variety of choice.

One of the searches I am doing for example; looking for a series of obscure books &quot;elements of mining engineering&quot;

All the search engines that are claiming better than google seem to come up short.  

IMO if there is something better than Google I&#039;m sure it would be in the media...because schmucks in the media thrive/live on Google (including myself) 

 Google has done it for me for the last 5 years, I haven&#039;t seen something better.

Just my opinion...

8)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm not sure if I agree.</p>
<p>Just did several search&#8217;s on some items and Google seemed to give me the variety of choice.</p>
<p>One of the searches I am doing for example; looking for a series of obscure books &#8220;elements of mining engineering&#8221;</p>
<p>All the search engines that are claiming better than google seem to come up short.  </p>
<p>IMO if there is something better than Google I&#8217;m sure it would be in the media&#8230;because schmucks in the media thrive/live on Google (including myself) </p>
<p> Google has done it for me for the last 5 years, I haven&#8217;t seen something better.</p>
<p>Just my opinion&#8230;</p>
<p>8)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/comment-page-1/#comment-1094105</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/#comment-1094105</guid>
		<description>Sorry Gigablast does not even come close to Google for real everyday usage. I ran some tests and mostly Gigablast does not contain important pages in its index. 

The world doesn&#039;t need another Google, perhaps smaller more specialized search engines would be a better idea for emerging providers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Gigablast does not even come close to Google for real everyday usage. I ran some tests and mostly Gigablast does not contain important pages in its index. </p>
<p>The world doesn&#8217;t need another Google, perhaps smaller more specialized search engines would be a better idea for emerging providers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katu</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/comment-page-1/#comment-1087395</link>
		<dc:creator>katu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/#comment-1087395</guid>
		<description>the best homepage ever is
http://www.asieragos.es/english.html
you can search on google, delicious, youtube, wikipedia, mp3gle..... and much more in a easy and fast way,
if you try it, you&#039;ll love it!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the best homepage ever is<br />
<a href="http://www.asieragos.es/english.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.asieragos.es/english.html</a><br />
you can search on google, delicious, youtube, wikipedia, mp3gle&#8230;.. and much more in a easy and fast way,<br />
if you try it, you&#8217;ll love it!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikeal</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/comment-page-1/#comment-1085712</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/gigablast-better-than-google-or-askcom-according-to-study/6551/#comment-1085712</guid>
		<description>Gigablas has always been just as good as Google, and also the technology ie they use less servers and are more energy efficient.

Sadly good had the two stanford grads story to sell to teh media, Gigablast hasnt had the ability to catch the medias attention.


Its the media folks ( look at the elections, the only way obama was so prominent or hilary was over the others is because the media was on their side).

xenbet.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gigablas has always been just as good as Google, and also the technology ie they use less servers and are more energy efficient.</p>
<p>Sadly good had the two stanford grads story to sell to teh media, Gigablast hasnt had the ability to catch the medias attention.</p>
<p>Its the media folks ( look at the elections, the only way obama was so prominent or hilary was over the others is because the media was on their side).</p>
<p>xenbet.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

