Comments on: Forget PageRank, Here’s StumbleRank http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-pagerank-heres-stumblerank/5937/ Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Stef http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-pagerank-heres-stumblerank/5937/comment-page-1/#comment-1095300 Stef Mon, 09 Mar 2009 20:54:46 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-pagerank-heres-stumblerank/5937/#comment-1095300 The problem with Stumble Upon is that the pages with the most stumbles get stumbled more. New sites have a very hard time increasing their stumblerank. The problem with Stumble Upon is that the pages with the most stumbles get stumbled more. New sites have a very hard time increasing their stumblerank.

]]> By: Kabelky http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-pagerank-heres-stumblerank/5937/comment-page-1/#comment-1073192 Kabelky Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:45:06 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-pagerank-heres-stumblerank/5937/#comment-1073192 Stumble rank is difficult because you need to stumble it. PageRank is calculating by program. Stumble rank is difficult because you need to stumble it. PageRank is calculating by program.

]]> By: Ken Savage http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-pagerank-heres-stumblerank/5937/comment-page-1/#comment-703854 Ken Savage Wed, 07 Nov 2007 18:18:04 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-pagerank-heres-stumblerank/5937/#comment-703854 Nice job to Muhammad Saleem. Where is your ranking on StumbleRank? Nice job to Muhammad Saleem.

Where is your ranking on StumbleRank?

]]> By: Samsonite http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-pagerank-heres-stumblerank/5937/comment-page-1/#comment-699614 Samsonite Sat, 03 Nov 2007 11:46:31 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-pagerank-heres-stumblerank/5937/#comment-699614 We stumble it our webiste and after PR update the stumble web page get PR1. But it is to worky to sumble it all the time. We stumble it our webiste and after PR update the stumble web page get PR1. But it is to worky to sumble it all the time.

]]> By: Kym http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-pagerank-heres-stumblerank/5937/comment-page-1/#comment-699389 Kym Sat, 03 Nov 2007 06:31:51 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-pagerank-heres-stumblerank/5937/#comment-699389 Come on. It is all about 15 minutes of fame from MillionDollarHome page to blogs to stumbles. Lack of Fame is the new Poverty in the US. Come on. It is all about 15 minutes of fame from MillionDollarHome page to blogs to stumbles.

Lack of Fame is the new Poverty in the US.

]]> By: Rabin http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-pagerank-heres-stumblerank/5937/comment-page-1/#comment-698736 Rabin Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:29:57 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-pagerank-heres-stumblerank/5937/#comment-698736 I agree with Mark whole heartedly. When I am looking for any information, I am not going to judge the information per say based on others verdict. Of course I want to have information from authoritative sites, but that I can find on the web anyway. If you are true to yourself and others and right the right information pertinent to the area of your specialization, you will be found. You don't have to trick the machine, and there in you are tricking humans, which is a total dichotomy. All this gimmick about digg, stumbleupon, squedoo, or whatever these weird names people come up with, will not help in true sense customers who are seeking information. I agree with Mark whole heartedly. When I am looking for any information, I am not going to judge the information per say based on others verdict. Of course I want to have information from authoritative sites, but that I can find on the web anyway. If you are true to yourself and others and right the right information pertinent to the area of your specialization, you will be found. You don’t have to trick the machine, and there in you are tricking humans, which is a total dichotomy. All this gimmick about digg, stumbleupon, squedoo, or whatever these weird names people come up with, will not help in true sense customers who are seeking information.

]]> By: Mark http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-pagerank-heres-stumblerank/5937/comment-page-1/#comment-698433 Mark Fri, 02 Nov 2007 14:04:32 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-pagerank-heres-stumblerank/5937/#comment-698433 This is utter crap. Why is Mohamed Saleem trying to turn everything into a popularity contest? The Top users list killed digg and now those dethroned people sit around and bitch all day long about how their crap is being burried or how hard it is to hit the front page. The web is not a popularity contest stop trying to make it one!!! Who cares who is the "top stumbler" anyways? There is no single top stumbler. Some Stumblers focus on one area and they lead that area and no where else. I'm getting tired of these former top diggers grasping at straws to regain their fame and fortune. It's a damn good thing that digg dropped that top digger list. This is utter crap. Why is Mohamed Saleem trying to turn everything into a popularity contest? The Top users list killed digg and now those dethroned people sit around and bitch all day long about how their crap is being burried or how hard it is to hit the front page.

The web is not a popularity contest stop trying to make it one!!!

Who cares who is the “top stumbler” anyways? There is no single top stumbler. Some Stumblers focus on one area and they lead that area and no where else.

I’m getting tired of these former top diggers grasping at straws to regain their fame and fortune. It’s a damn good thing that digg dropped that top digger list.

]]> By: Hantulga http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-pagerank-heres-stumblerank/5937/comment-page-1/#comment-698003 Hantulga Fri, 02 Nov 2007 06:52:07 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-pagerank-heres-stumblerank/5937/#comment-698003 nice news. nice news.

]]>