<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fixing Google Web 2.0&#160;Style</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:28:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/comment-page-1/#comment-1082681</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/#comment-1082681</guid>
		<description>How many of your clients do know what is Pagerank? It is simply a measure of the authority of the site and it is definitely not a measure of your competence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many of your clients do know what is Pagerank? It is simply a measure of the authority of the site and it is definitely not a measure of your competence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwayne Charrington</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/comment-page-1/#comment-942417</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwayne Charrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/#comment-942417</guid>
		<description>If people are stupid enough to use link exchanges in the hope of increasing their Pagerank, I say let them do it. Of course Google will never ever admit defeat over Pagerank, it may have been effective many years ago but it&#039;s 2008 now and they need a Pagerank 2.0.

- Dwayne Charrington.
http://www.dwaynecharrington.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If people are stupid enough to use link exchanges in the hope of increasing their Pagerank, I say let them do it. Of course Google will never ever admit defeat over Pagerank, it may have been effective many years ago but it&#8217;s 2008 now and they need a Pagerank 2.0.</p>
<p>- Dwayne Charrington.<br />
<a href="http://www.dwaynecharrington.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dwaynecharrington.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Web Design</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/comment-page-1/#comment-891596</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/#comment-891596</guid>
		<description>Google simply will never admit defeat and failure. Let them continue trying, as long as they do not start opening fire against friendly sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google simply will never admit defeat and failure. Let them continue trying, as long as they do not start opening fire against friendly sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Keegan</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/comment-page-1/#comment-458294</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Keegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 14:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/#comment-458294</guid>
		<description>I am hoping that Google&#039;s &quot;warning&quot; serves as just that -- something being said to get people to examine the way that they do business. Unfortunately, link farmers aren&#039;t the only ones who will suffer as legitimate sites will be hurt too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am hoping that Google&#8217;s &#8220;warning&#8221; serves as just that &#8212; something being said to get people to examine the way that they do business. Unfortunately, link farmers aren&#8217;t the only ones who will suffer as legitimate sites will be hurt too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarstenCumbrowski</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/comment-page-1/#comment-458053</link>
		<dc:creator>CarstenCumbrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 00:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/#comment-458053</guid>
		<description>Fast Test Geek,

Thanks for the comment.

I think that all search engines get better and are already doing a quite good job in semantically determine if page one is related to another in topic (not purpose). 

Purpose or intend is something that can not be determined that well using semantics, except for straight forward link anchor text like &quot;buy v*agra&quot; (hehe). 

That is the part where they could get help from webmasters. Nofollow and how they want to use it, is no help,  but the opposite. See post III for some of my suggestions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fast Test Geek,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>I think that all search engines get better and are already doing a quite good job in semantically determine if page one is related to another in topic (not purpose). </p>
<p>Purpose or intend is something that can not be determined that well using semantics, except for straight forward link anchor text like &#8220;buy v*agra&#8221; (hehe). </p>
<p>That is the part where they could get help from webmasters. Nofollow and how they want to use it, is no help,  but the opposite. See post III for some of my suggestions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fast Test Geek</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/comment-page-1/#comment-458010</link>
		<dc:creator>Fast Test Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 21:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/#comment-458010</guid>
		<description>It was discussed alot about lowering value of links with contextually non-related resources. But what&#039;s for pretty looking links &quot;in theme&quot;? How to determine that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was discussed alot about lowering value of links with contextually non-related resources. But what&#8217;s for pretty looking links &#8220;in theme&#8221;? How to determine that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/comment-page-1/#comment-458002</link>
		<dc:creator>gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 21:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/#comment-458002</guid>
		<description>nobody seems to get is that the best way to get traffic is to do something and do it well. you won&#039;t go to google hell if you play nice but really we need to get rid of google&#039;s crazy marketshare.

http://www.cheapgreencar.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nobody seems to get is that the best way to get traffic is to do something and do it well. you won&#8217;t go to google hell if you play nice but really we need to get rid of google&#8217;s crazy marketshare.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cheapgreencar.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cheapgreencar.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Used Car Parts Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/comment-page-1/#comment-457954</link>
		<dc:creator>Used Car Parts Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 18:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/#comment-457954</guid>
		<description>I would love to see anoter search engine move up the charts,  I&#039;m done gooleing etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see anoter search engine move up the charts,  I&#8217;m done gooleing etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcel</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/comment-page-1/#comment-457939</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 18:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/#comment-457939</guid>
		<description>Google Adwords is a short term advertising service.

Google will have to start offering long term advertising services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Adwords is a short term advertising service.</p>
<p>Google will have to start offering long term advertising services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/comment-page-1/#comment-457930</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fixing-google-web-20-style/4821/#comment-457930</guid>
		<description>Google is pitting the search engine spammers against one another. Probably a smart move, letting the spam competitors serve as police against one another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is pitting the search engine spammers against one another. Probably a smart move, letting the spam competitors serve as police against one another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

