<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3.6 To Have Self-Profiling&#160;Extension</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/firefox-36-to-have-self-profiling-extension/11070/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/firefox-36-to-have-self-profiling-extension/11070/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/firefox-36-to-have-self-profiling-extension/11070/comment-page-1/#comment-1104244</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 10:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=11070#comment-1104244</guid>
		<description>@Naz. I hope you are trolling, either that or you were thinking 3.0.6.

And I hope the author here means that the first alpha of 3.6 is due soon (and even thats a stretch). Because 3.6 final isn&#039;t due for a long long time, and by the sounds of things, there isn&#039;t enough finalised for 3.6 yet to call it an alpha. 


Journalists probably shouldn&#039;t be writing articles about pre-alpha extensions either. Especially when it obvious that this is just a repost of someone else&#039;s story, because the author doesn&#039;t know the obvious basics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Naz. I hope you are trolling, either that or you were thinking 3.0.6.</p>
<p>And I hope the author here means that the first alpha of 3.6 is due soon (and even thats a stretch). Because 3.6 final isn&#8217;t due for a long long time, and by the sounds of things, there isn&#8217;t enough finalised for 3.6 yet to call it an alpha. </p>
<p>Journalists probably shouldn&#8217;t be writing articles about pre-alpha extensions either. Especially when it obvious that this is just a repost of someone else&#8217;s story, because the author doesn&#8217;t know the obvious basics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naz</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/firefox-36-to-have-self-profiling-extension/11070/comment-page-1/#comment-1103974</link>
		<dc:creator>naz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=11070#comment-1103974</guid>
		<description>3.6 has been available since October of last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3.6 has been available since October of last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k3davis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/firefox-36-to-have-self-profiling-extension/11070/comment-page-1/#comment-1103278</link>
		<dc:creator>k3davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=11070#comment-1103278</guid>
		<description>How much confusion in these comments.

3.6 (the first alpha) is expected 4 weeks after 3.5 final, which could occur any day now.

The feature described above uses the places database local to your machine. There is no third party knowledge of the data implied, thus no privacy issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much confusion in these comments.</p>
<p>3.6 (the first alpha) is expected 4 weeks after 3.5 final, which could occur any day now.</p>
<p>The feature described above uses the places database local to your machine. There is no third party knowledge of the data implied, thus no privacy issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/firefox-36-to-have-self-profiling-extension/11070/comment-page-1/#comment-1103004</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=11070#comment-1103004</guid>
		<description>Something else to suck up your bandwidth?  With service providers trying to cut bandwidth,  that isn&#039;t such a great idea.  

And people keeping info on me is not to my liking.  What happened to privacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something else to suck up your bandwidth?  With service providers trying to cut bandwidth,  that isn&#8217;t such a great idea.  </p>
<p>And people keeping info on me is not to my liking.  What happened to privacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tag44</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/firefox-36-to-have-self-profiling-extension/11070/comment-page-1/#comment-1102788</link>
		<dc:creator>Tag44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=11070#comment-1102788</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the information regarding Firefox 3.6 in advance, it really works soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the information regarding Firefox 3.6 in advance, it really works soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nino B</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/firefox-36-to-have-self-profiling-extension/11070/comment-page-1/#comment-1102757</link>
		<dc:creator>Nino B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=11070#comment-1102757</guid>
		<description>Very interesting, can&#039;t wait for the new firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, can&#8217;t wait for the new firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron V.</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/firefox-36-to-have-self-profiling-extension/11070/comment-page-1/#comment-1102739</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=11070#comment-1102739</guid>
		<description>Firefox 3.6 is not about to be released soon.
The next coming version is 3.5; this version will probably be released pretty soon.
So it&#039;s going to take a little while until this feature becomes part of Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox 3.6 is not about to be released soon.<br />
The next coming version is 3.5; this version will probably be released pretty soon.<br />
So it&#8217;s going to take a little while until this feature becomes part of Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

