<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fighting Duplicate Content On&#160;WordPress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:48:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: geobak</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/comment-page-1/#comment-1097560</link>
		<dc:creator>geobak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 23:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/#comment-1097560</guid>
		<description>@korea sem company

A few days ago i would suggest that you should...But lately i&#039;ve seen some strange results on my blog.For example my tags and or categories ranking higher than my actual post.In fact in some cases my tag and or categories score a first page result whereas the actual post might be lower in first page or not first page at all...The search results for the specific keywords are of course less than 100,000 so this might be a reason for this &quot;problem&quot; since there are not many trustworthy results so google ranks high my supplemental results too...Anyhow i would like an expert to comment on this even if i commented on an on year old post :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@korea sem company</p>
<p>A few days ago i would suggest that you should&#8230;But lately i&#8217;ve seen some strange results on my blog.For example my tags and or categories ranking higher than my actual post.In fact in some cases my tag and or categories score a first page result whereas the actual post might be lower in first page or not first page at all&#8230;The search results for the specific keywords are of course less than 100,000 so this might be a reason for this &#8220;problem&#8221; since there are not many trustworthy results so google ranks high my supplemental results too&#8230;Anyhow i would like an expert to comment on this even if i commented on an on year old post :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: korea sem company</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/comment-page-1/#comment-1086956</link>
		<dc:creator>korea sem company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/#comment-1086956</guid>
		<description>I have used this plug in what i want to ask a question. Should i restrict Google from indexing tag pages?. I&#039;M not sure about that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used this plug in what i want to ask a question. Should i restrict Google from indexing tag pages?. I&#8217;M not sure about that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Web Design</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/comment-page-1/#comment-890948</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/#comment-890948</guid>
		<description>As long as you do not show the full content of the post more than twice, it should not be a problem. Yes, i agree that there are more than one way to solving a duplicated problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as you do not show the full content of the post more than twice, it should not be a problem. Yes, i agree that there are more than one way to solving a duplicated problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/comment-page-1/#comment-538031</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/#comment-538031</guid>
		<description>I know what I should do, but I like playing around and testing things slowly.

I also want easy solutions for other people to adopt if I make changes myself.

Wordpress duplicate content can actually be used to your advantage if you want to go a little geeky in your SEO

http://andybeard.eu/2007/06/wordpress-seo-masterclass-for-competitive-niches.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what I should do, but I like playing around and testing things slowly.</p>
<p>I also want easy solutions for other people to adopt if I make changes myself.</p>
<p>WordPress duplicate content can actually be used to your advantage if you want to go a little geeky in your SEO</p>
<p><a href="http://andybeard.eu/2007/06/wordpress-seo-masterclass-for-competitive-niches.html" rel="nofollow">http://andybeard.eu/2007/06/wordpress-seo-masterclass-for-competitive-niches.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/comment-page-1/#comment-537112</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/#comment-537112</guid>
		<description>BB - I struggled with that for a some time while testing other WordPress blogs.  For example, for another blog I created, I specifically added unique text, title tags and meta data to each category to avoid the supplemental index.  I&#039;m pretty certain that the blog (as a whole) will come out of the supplemental index eventually but I&#039;m not being as proactive as I should about actively seeking out high quality links or doing other things to address the supplemental issue.

I took a step back to think about what value the category/archive pages have in relationship to the entire content when looking at our company blog.  Essentially, the core value is in the individual posts - with the categories providing a user-friendly way to access specific content, but not necessarily unique within itself.  If I block the duplication from being indexed, even though its just part of the user experience (and not meant to be misleading), the logic is that the Google can crawl and index exactly what I want.

The key difference here are that the domain already had some (not great but some) age and value with inbound links versus working with an entirely new domain.  It&#039;s also pretty early in the launch, so it may be too early to tell.  

Interestingly, Google is crawling and indexing the material at an incredibly fast rate.  Posts written 2 days ago are already in the main index.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BB &#8211; I struggled with that for a some time while testing other WordPress blogs.  For example, for another blog I created, I specifically added unique text, title tags and meta data to each category to avoid the supplemental index.  I&#8217;m pretty certain that the blog (as a whole) will come out of the supplemental index eventually but I&#8217;m not being as proactive as I should about actively seeking out high quality links or doing other things to address the supplemental issue.</p>
<p>I took a step back to think about what value the category/archive pages have in relationship to the entire content when looking at our company blog.  Essentially, the core value is in the individual posts &#8211; with the categories providing a user-friendly way to access specific content, but not necessarily unique within itself.  If I block the duplication from being indexed, even though its just part of the user experience (and not meant to be misleading), the logic is that the Google can crawl and index exactly what I want.</p>
<p>The key difference here are that the domain already had some (not great but some) age and value with inbound links versus working with an entirely new domain.  It&#8217;s also pretty early in the launch, so it may be too early to tell.  </p>
<p>Interestingly, Google is crawling and indexing the material at an incredibly fast rate.  Posts written 2 days ago are already in the main index.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/comment-page-1/#comment-536740</link>
		<dc:creator>john andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/#comment-536740</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention, but be  careful when looking at blogs like mine for live optimization tips. Yes there are methods at work in there, but there is also a ton of SEO negligence. The  absence of some factors helps us &quot;see&quot; the impact of our efforts in the search engines.  If you are advanced enough to see the difference, great. But if not, be careful because I don&#039;t want to mislead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention, but be  careful when looking at blogs like mine for live optimization tips. Yes there are methods at work in there, but there is also a ton of SEO negligence. The  absence of some factors helps us &#8220;see&#8221; the impact of our efforts in the search engines.  If you are advanced enough to see the difference, great. But if not, be careful because I don&#8217;t want to mislead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/comment-page-1/#comment-536710</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/#comment-536710</guid>
		<description>The feeds were being served however WordPress serves them by default. However your question made me realize that I am using the Permalink Redirect plugin. It&#039;s the only plugin I have installed that might be having some effect, though I couldn&#039;t say if it has anything to do with the issue.

The robots.txt solution did work for me and within a week my posts were out of supplemental. I know some others have seen the same thing I did, but some didn&#039;t. Now I&#039;m wondering if the plugin might be the reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The feeds were being served however WordPress serves them by default. However your question made me realize that I am using the Permalink Redirect plugin. It&#8217;s the only plugin I have installed that might be having some effect, though I couldn&#8217;t say if it has anything to do with the issue.</p>
<p>The robots.txt solution did work for me and within a week my posts were out of supplemental. I know some others have seen the same thing I did, but some didn&#8217;t. Now I&#8217;m wondering if the plugin might be the reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/comment-page-1/#comment-536633</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/#comment-536633</guid>
		<description>We just released a new blog, on domain on our website and one of the concerns was how to prevent the blog posts from going supplemental.  Here&#039;s what I&#039;ve done thus far that has provided (as of today) the right mix for success.

First - I modified the permalink structure so that only the post title appeared after domain.com/blog/

Then, I blocked Google from indexing category pages and yearly archives (robots.txt).  In the perfect world, I&#039;d love to create unique content on each category, but that would have been incredibly time consuming and past efforts had failed to get  other blogs out of the supplemental results.

For whatever reason, Yahoo and MSN don&#039;t have issues with the duplication of archives.

Our posts are now individually indexed in Google&#039;s regular results 

Note - I actually have to give the props to Scoreboard Media.  I&#039;d been fishing around other people&#039;s Robots files (that were using WordPress) and I liked their solution the best (and it&#039;s working).

I may try to expand upon this whole thing on our blog, as it all happened in coordination with a web hosting change, redirect etc etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We just released a new blog, on domain on our website and one of the concerns was how to prevent the blog posts from going supplemental.  Here&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve done thus far that has provided (as of today) the right mix for success.</p>
<p>First &#8211; I modified the permalink structure so that only the post title appeared after domain.com/blog/</p>
<p>Then, I blocked Google from indexing category pages and yearly archives (robots.txt).  In the perfect world, I&#8217;d love to create unique content on each category, but that would have been incredibly time consuming and past efforts had failed to get  other blogs out of the supplemental results.</p>
<p>For whatever reason, Yahoo and MSN don&#8217;t have issues with the duplication of archives.</p>
<p>Our posts are now individually indexed in Google&#8217;s regular results </p>
<p>Note &#8211; I actually have to give the props to Scoreboard Media.  I&#8217;d been fishing around other people&#8217;s Robots files (that were using WordPress) and I liked their solution the best (and it&#8217;s working).</p>
<p>I may try to expand upon this whole thing on our blog, as it all happened in coordination with a web hosting change, redirect etc etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/comment-page-1/#comment-536525</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/#comment-536525</guid>
		<description>One thing that happened to me about a year ago with WordPress was Google indexing the feeds in addition to the posts and my entire blog ended up going supplemental.

I found a couple of threads on Webmasterworld that led me to the solution which &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yellowhousehosting.com/resources/2006/10/16/problems-with-wordpress-posts-going-supplemental-in-googles-index/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I blogged about&lt;/a&gt; (apologies for the link)

The gist of the solution was to block the feeds in my robots.txt file with the use of wildcards for Googlebot. In about a week all the posts were back in the main index.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that happened to me about a year ago with WordPress was Google indexing the feeds in addition to the posts and my entire blog ended up going supplemental.</p>
<p>I found a couple of threads on Webmasterworld that led me to the solution which <a href="http://www.yellowhousehosting.com/resources/2006/10/16/problems-with-wordpress-posts-going-supplemental-in-googles-index/" rel="nofollow">I blogged about</a> (apologies for the link)</p>
<p>The gist of the solution was to block the feeds in my robots.txt file with the use of wildcards for Googlebot. In about a week all the posts were back in the main index.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Business Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/comment-page-1/#comment-536448</link>
		<dc:creator>Business Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fighting-duplicate-content-on-wordpress/5380/#comment-536448</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with you there Michael.  An internal linking strategy is a good strategy to have.   That&#039;s one thing that most bloggers could focus on just a bit more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with you there Michael.  An internal linking strategy is a good strategy to have.   That&#8217;s one thing that most bloggers could focus on just a bit more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

