<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Overlook the Power of Keywords in the Singular&#160;Form</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/dont-overlook-the-power-of-keywords-in-the-singular-form/7114/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/dont-overlook-the-power-of-keywords-in-the-singular-form/7114/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Kaufman</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/dont-overlook-the-power-of-keywords-in-the-singular-form/7114/comment-page-1/#comment-1082162</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Kaufman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/dont-overlook-the-power-of-keywords-in-the-singular-form/7114/#comment-1082162</guid>
		<description>Ann, I think you may have misunderstood me.  I don&#039;t believe there is a way to have Google Trends give data on literal matches to search terms.  I was calling out their word choice -- &quot;contains&quot;, which would indicate, as you wrote in your post, that Google Trends gives data on broad matches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann, I think you may have misunderstood me.  I don&#8217;t believe there is a way to have Google Trends give data on literal matches to search terms.  I was calling out their word choice &#8212; &#8220;contains&#8221;, which would indicate, as you wrote in your post, that Google Trends gives data on broad matches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Smarty</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/dont-overlook-the-power-of-keywords-in-the-singular-form/7114/comment-page-1/#comment-1082101</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Smarty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/dont-overlook-the-power-of-keywords-in-the-singular-form/7114/#comment-1082101</guid>
		<description>@Mark : tried it, didn&#039;t seem to help? Do you have another experience?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark : tried it, didn&#8217;t seem to help? Do you have another experience?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Kaufman</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/dont-overlook-the-power-of-keywords-in-the-singular-form/7114/comment-page-1/#comment-1081875</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Kaufman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/dont-overlook-the-power-of-keywords-in-the-singular-form/7114/#comment-1081875</guid>
		<description>The About Google Trends page (http://www.google.com/intl/en/trends/about.html#6) indirectly suggests that Google Trends data is for searches that *contain* your term:

To restrict your results to only those searches that *contain* your terms in the specific order you&#039;ve entered them, you can put your terms in quotation marks: &quot;snow boots&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The About Google Trends page (<a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/trends/about.html#6" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/intl/en/trends/about.html#6</a>) indirectly suggests that Google Trends data is for searches that *contain* your term:</p>
<p>To restrict your results to only those searches that *contain* your terms in the specific order you&#8217;ve entered them, you can put your terms in quotation marks: &#8220;snow boots&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/dont-overlook-the-power-of-keywords-in-the-singular-form/7114/comment-page-1/#comment-1081358</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/dont-overlook-the-power-of-keywords-in-the-singular-form/7114/#comment-1081358</guid>
		<description>We had this discussion in the office a while back.  I tended to go with the singular when optimizing while others would suggest that when searching for many things people would look for options on more than just a single make or model.  I imagine that the singular would still work better as it would double in both cases (not always) due to stemming.

Anyhow, your broad match theory seems to make the most sense to me on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had this discussion in the office a while back.  I tended to go with the singular when optimizing while others would suggest that when searching for many things people would look for options on more than just a single make or model.  I imagine that the singular would still work better as it would double in both cases (not always) due to stemming.</p>
<p>Anyhow, your broad match theory seems to make the most sense to me on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gautamm Mehra</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/dont-overlook-the-power-of-keywords-in-the-singular-form/7114/comment-page-1/#comment-1081349</link>
		<dc:creator>Gautamm Mehra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/dont-overlook-the-power-of-keywords-in-the-singular-form/7114/#comment-1081349</guid>
		<description>Pretty amazing right!

Besides the reason of broad matching as mentioned in the article, Google also uses &quot;word stemming&quot; technologies. These means that even though one may be looking for &quot;swimming&quot;, Google also pulls up &quot;swim&quot; as it is the stem word. It does this with various algorithms such as LSI, Porter Stemming etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty amazing right!</p>
<p>Besides the reason of broad matching as mentioned in the article, Google also uses &#8220;word stemming&#8221; technologies. These means that even though one may be looking for &#8220;swimming&#8221;, Google also pulls up &#8220;swim&#8221; as it is the stem word. It does this with various algorithms such as LSI, Porter Stemming etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Billingsley</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/dont-overlook-the-power-of-keywords-in-the-singular-form/7114/comment-page-1/#comment-1081294</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Billingsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/dont-overlook-the-power-of-keywords-in-the-singular-form/7114/#comment-1081294</guid>
		<description>My original thought was the trend likely follows the type of product some is searching for. People only buy a single laptop (usually), but tend to buy multiple candles. BUT, looking at G Trends - doesn&#039;t seem to be the case.

Video game beats video games, candle beats candles, book beats books.

I suspect you are right with the broad match assumption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My original thought was the trend likely follows the type of product some is searching for. People only buy a single laptop (usually), but tend to buy multiple candles. BUT, looking at G Trends &#8211; doesn&#8217;t seem to be the case.</p>
<p>Video game beats video games, candle beats candles, book beats books.</p>
<p>I suspect you are right with the broad match assumption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

