<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Digg Lift Some Site&#160;Bans?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/did-digg-lift-some-site-bans/4446/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/did-digg-lift-some-site-bans/4446/</link>
	<description>Latest Search Engine News from the Search Engine Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:21:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/did-digg-lift-some-site-bans/4446/comment-page-1/#comment-403793</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4446#comment-403793</guid>
		<description>Carsten, you have pinpointed the catch 22 of the friend list in Digg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carsten, you have pinpointed the catch 22 of the friend list in Digg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarstenCumbrowski</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/did-digg-lift-some-site-bans/4446/comment-page-1/#comment-403657</link>
		<dc:creator>CarstenCumbrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4446#comment-403657</guid>
		<description>When I checked nobody had posted anything yet. That was the first thing I did when I noticed that the Error message at Digg did not show up. 

While I was writing my post on Friday to Saturday night (which is a bit longer as you can see), ProNet and Techcrunch posted their little story.  SEJ is also Eastern Time. 

Everything happened pretty much parallel what you can&#039;t see, because post on all blogs only show dates and not times.

Anyhow. I am glad that it happened. That is much more important. I also think that my other points are valid and should be considered by Digg. 

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I checked nobody had posted anything yet. That was the first thing I did when I noticed that the Error message at Digg did not show up. </p>
<p>While I was writing my post on Friday to Saturday night (which is a bit longer as you can see), ProNet and Techcrunch posted their little story.  SEJ is also Eastern Time. </p>
<p>Everything happened pretty much parallel what you can&#8217;t see, because post on all blogs only show dates and not times.</p>
<p>Anyhow. I am glad that it happened. That is much more important. I also think that my other points are valid and should be considered by Digg. </p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skitzzo</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/did-digg-lift-some-site-bans/4446/comment-page-1/#comment-402383</link>
		<dc:creator>Skitzzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 05:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4446#comment-402383</guid>
		<description>Yup, and ProNetAdvertising posted about it yesterday (and it of course made the Digg home page the same day as well)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, and ProNetAdvertising posted about it yesterday (and it of course made the Digg home page the same day as well)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Heseltine</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/did-digg-lift-some-site-bans/4446/comment-page-1/#comment-401746</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Heseltine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4446#comment-401746</guid>
		<description>Yep, TechCrunch posted about this this morning

http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/23/digg-upgrades-spam-armor-unblocks-sites/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, TechCrunch posted about this this morning</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/23/digg-upgrades-spam-armor-unblocks-sites/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/23/digg-upgrades-spam-armor-unblocks-sites/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
