<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Behavioral Targeting Flaws Put Advertisers at&#160;Risk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:21:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarrod1937</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/comment-page-1/#comment-1271768</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarrod1937</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 04:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/#comment-1271768</guid>
		<description>First, i know this is an old post, but figured i&#039;d comment anyways. You&#039;re missing the point in my opinion. It may seem like a flaw when you analyze it that closely, only paying attention to the search relevancy factor... However, what you&#039;re paying google for with adwords, is an advertising spot to &quot;targeted users&quot;, notice i said &quot;users&quot;, not &quot;searches&quot;. If i just searched for tampa dodge dealerships three searches ago, i may still be looking even though my search has changed, aka the ad is still targeted at me, the user. One thing you&#039;re missing with this example is the time factor. I&#039;m sure google only uses this approach when the searches are close together, and as such, your search 3 minutes ago may still have relevant interest in your at the time of the targeted ad display. Thus you may still get targeted traffic from your ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, i know this is an old post, but figured i&#39;d comment anyways. You&#39;re missing the point in my opinion. It may seem like a flaw when you analyze it that closely, only paying attention to the search relevancy factor&#8230; However, what you&#39;re paying google for with adwords, is an advertising spot to &#8220;targeted users&#8221;, notice i said &#8220;users&#8221;, not &#8220;searches&#8221;. If i just searched for tampa dodge dealerships three searches ago, i may still be looking even though my search has changed, aka the ad is still targeted at me, the user. One thing you&#39;re missing with this example is the time factor. I&#39;m sure google only uses this approach when the searches are close together, and as such, your search 3 minutes ago may still have relevant interest in your at the time of the targeted ad display. Thus you may still get targeted traffic from your ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarrod1937</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/comment-page-1/#comment-1242144</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarrod1937</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 23:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/#comment-1242144</guid>
		<description>First, i know this is an old post, but figured i&#039;d comment anyways. You&#039;re missing the point in my opinion. It may seem like a flaw when you analyze it that closely, only paying attention to the search relevancy factor... However, what you&#039;re paying google for with adwords, is an advertising spot to &quot;targeted users&quot;, notice i said &quot;users&quot;, not &quot;searches&quot;. If i just searched for tampa dodge dealerships three searches ago, i may still be looking even though my search has changed, aka the ad is still targeted at me, the user. One thing you&#039;re missing with this example is the time factor. I&#039;m sure google only uses this approach when the searches are close together, and as such, your search 3 minutes ago may still have relevant interest in your at the time of the targeted ad display. Thus you may still get targeted traffic from your ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, i know this is an old post, but figured i&#39;d comment anyways. You&#39;re missing the point in my opinion. It may seem like a flaw when you analyze it that closely, only paying attention to the search relevancy factor&#8230; However, what you&#39;re paying google for with adwords, is an advertising spot to &#8220;targeted users&#8221;, notice i said &#8220;users&#8221;, not &#8220;searches&#8221;. If i just searched for tampa dodge dealerships three searches ago, i may still be looking even though my search has changed, aka the ad is still targeted at me, the user. One thing you&#39;re missing with this example is the time factor. I&#39;m sure google only uses this approach when the searches are close together, and as such, your search 3 minutes ago may still have relevant interest in your at the time of the targeted ad display. Thus you may still get targeted traffic from your ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Gladysz</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/comment-page-1/#comment-1096682</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Gladysz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/#comment-1096682</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t get the video to show up.  Can you send a direct link?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t get the video to show up.  Can you send a direct link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/comment-page-1/#comment-950040</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/#comment-950040</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t notice any falls in revenue until January 1, when suddenly the floor fell out. I didn&#039;t even learn about behavioral marketing until today. My suspicion is that they&#039;re using it to displace what would otherwise be remnant or at least very poorly performing ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t notice any falls in revenue until January 1, when suddenly the floor fell out. I didn&#8217;t even learn about behavioral marketing until today. My suspicion is that they&#8217;re using it to displace what would otherwise be remnant or at least very poorly performing ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dizi izle</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/comment-page-1/#comment-893408</link>
		<dc:creator>dizi izle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/#comment-893408</guid>
		<description>really interesting video. fantastic find… this can negatively effect advertisers… reduction in click through rate, lower ad position, higher cost per click. just doesn’t seem like a very efficient way to deploy behavioral targeting - especially on adwords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really interesting video. fantastic find… this can negatively effect advertisers… reduction in click through rate, lower ad position, higher cost per click. just doesn’t seem like a very efficient way to deploy behavioral targeting &#8211; especially on adwords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Servicii SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/comment-page-1/#comment-872048</link>
		<dc:creator>Servicii SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/#comment-872048</guid>
		<description>If that was a flaw, now is fixed. The results are clean and relevant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that was a flaw, now is fixed. The results are clean and relevant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anil Batra</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/comment-page-1/#comment-694592</link>
		<dc:creator>Anil Batra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/#comment-694592</guid>
		<description>My views are posted at
http://webanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/10/is-googles-behavioral-targeting-flawed.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My views are posted at<br />
<a href="http://webanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/10/is-googles-behavioral-targeting-flawed.html" rel="nofollow">http://webanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/10/is-googles-behavioral-targeting-flawed.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Add32</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/comment-page-1/#comment-692234</link>
		<dc:creator>Add32</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 06:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/#comment-692234</guid>
		<description>Put Advertisers at Risk is not a new technique :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put Advertisers at Risk is not a new technique :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Lander, Associate Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/comment-page-1/#comment-691575</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Lander, Associate Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/#comment-691575</guid>
		<description>Rabin, I would like to think that as well -- but we&#039;ve been recently reminded of how poor the search engines match user queries.  Check this out for example:

http://searchengineland.com/071023-093541.php

If users are that frustrated with search results -- one could assume then that they&#039;re not leaving Google... In fact, the majority are there trying to either perfect a search query to get the results they want -- OR -- are abandoning the original search and giving up to search for something new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rabin, I would like to think that as well &#8212; but we&#8217;ve been recently reminded of how poor the search engines match user queries.  Check this out for example:</p>
<p><a href="http://searchengineland.com/071023-093541.php" rel="nofollow">http://searchengineland.com/071023-093541.php</a></p>
<p>If users are that frustrated with search results &#8212; one could assume then that they&#8217;re not leaving Google&#8230; In fact, the majority are there trying to either perfect a search query to get the results they want &#8212; OR &#8212; are abandoning the original search and giving up to search for something new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabin</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/comment-page-1/#comment-691565</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/critical-flaws-in-googles-behavioral-targeting-puts-advertisers-at-risk/5898/#comment-691565</guid>
		<description>I have noticed this in the past. 

Logically speaking I think for a given session, a person would search for a similar things. In the example itself: Dodge, Ford, and Chevy are &quot;vehicles&quot;. I know as an advertiser, if I were Ford, and someone is searching for Dodge, I might want to get their attention. Hence, behavioral ad marketing system in use may be doing its job. 

When it comes to curtain and lawn care, there does seem to be a flaw. I believe Google is assuming that in a given session, meaning when the browser is up and running, people would do similar searches and turn their browser off after finding what they need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have noticed this in the past. </p>
<p>Logically speaking I think for a given session, a person would search for a similar things. In the example itself: Dodge, Ford, and Chevy are &#8220;vehicles&#8221;. I know as an advertiser, if I were Ford, and someone is searching for Dodge, I might want to get their attention. Hence, behavioral ad marketing system in use may be doing its job. </p>
<p>When it comes to curtain and lawn care, there does seem to be a flaw. I believe Google is assuming that in a given session, meaning when the browser is up and running, people would do similar searches and turn their browser off after finding what they need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

